Oh don't shoot down the great story about the evil hedge fund suing the poor charity!
Both. If you are sued you have to counter claim to defend otherwise pay up
Yes. Lots of legal people passing things around and rummaging thru files.
I can see the mythical 4000+ pages of emails
Is that the most Higgs can win is 29k or lose? Same for SISU, they can win "the sky" or lose "the sky"?
Oh don't shoot down the great story about the evil hedge fund suing the poor charity!
David Conn/Guardian have not been silenced,at least not yet. Their original article is still posted on the Guardian website and they stand by their story.How do I know? DC told me on 28 feb..
Have you sight of the Golden Share?
Both. If you are sued you have to counter claim to defend otherwise pay up
Is it really as exciting as you are making this seem - you should be a script writerDo they wear wigs by the way? (and I don't mean Mr Fisher)
What about the evil hedge fund reneging on it's obligations to a charity?
Or the evil hedge fund massively inflating it's costs in said counter claim?
They're still OK right?
Yes. Lots of legal people passing things around and rummaging thru files.
I can see the mythical 4000+ pages of emails
Are you certain? I thought you had the options of admit liability, defend the claim or issue a counter claim.
What about the evil hedge fund reneging on it's obligations to a charity?
Or the evil hedge fund massively inflating it's costs in said counter claim?
They're still OK right?
Surely this is what this is to find out?
Are you certain? I thought you had the options of admit liability, defend the claim or issue a counter claim.
The case & counter claim is about establishing whether the evil hedge fund did indeed renege or whether the charity did - try and retain some balance eh?
The counter claim does appear excessive though there may be some legal reason behind it.
Both. If you are sued you have to counter claim to defend otherwise pay up
serious question. is it normal to do that before the case against you has even been heard? i would assume you wait for the result first to find out if you have a case for counter claim.
serious question. is it normal to do that before the case against you has even been heard? i would assume you wait for the result first to find out if you have a case for counter claim.
@TheSimonGilbert: There's actually eight in Sisu's legal team it seems. Not enough seats on the bench.
I'd like to know this. Seems a ridiculous law to me, but wouldn't be the first.
All about implied terms of an agreement in contract law. Very deep legal stuff ATM
We don't want any of that vulgarity on here, thank you.
If the judge decides that there is no legal case, then what relevant evidence can there be? If there are grounds for a case, then bring in the evidence.
I'd like to know this. Seems a ridiculous law to me, but wouldn't be the first.
If the judge decides that there is no legal case, then what relevant evidence can there be? If there are grounds for a case, then bring in the evidence.
Rob S started it! I always thought AMTs were cash dispensers; until I was informed it was an act of supreme feminine benevolence, normally visited upon the fortunate recipient upon birthdays and anniversaries....
Evidence already submitted as part of skeleton arguments submitted prior.
All this is about judge being able to make a decision based on that plus AEHC barristers submission this morning.
Sisu QC wants to call PKH and Harris to the stand, judge might not think he needs to hear it.
Evidence submitted so far should still get out in public (inc. Emails)
Everybody wins? 29k to AEHC, emails in the public domain.
Seems to be coming up to final furlong...
@TheSimonGilbert: There's actually eight in Sisu's legal team it seems. Not enough seats on the bench.
Counter claims are how you defend yourself.
That's made me laugh, lends itself to a cracking 'Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells' letter to the Torygraph about how standards have slipped
so if sisu loose will they appeal or just take it on the chin and carry on with the counter claim as a defence?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?