Philosoraptor
Well-Known Member
Has someone been reading Tacitus? You need to blame Sallust for the writing style.
Last edited:
But you can't talk to one of them, without talking to the other.What is?
You said people shouldn't get CCFC and SISU mixed up. I am agreeing with you.
It's stupid full stop. Comparing a promotional video for Rugby to propaganda of a leader of a country where people are starving to death because it's being run so poorly, threatening world peace with a hunger to acquire nuclear arms and where people disappear and are murdered in genocide for being deemed to not tow a certain line even if they're family members is idiotic. If you can't see that then quite frankly so are you. There very simply is no comparison.
I can see it you moron, but I can also see it wasn't meant like that. Sadly you cant.
What next, we shouldn't have any forums in the UK as we arms deal with Saudi, who are perpetrators of human rights abuses, torture and so forth. Stop being faux outraged you keyboard warrior.
You need to chill out Tony, and stop acting like an outraged daily mail reader.
Are you being deliberately stupid? You don't make the comparison for the same reason you wouldn't with Goebbels. It's bad taste and failure to see that is idiotic. It was a stupid comparison to make.
Don't worry Tony I could never reach your heights of stupidity. Get over yourself you mouth frother. I don't read the daily Mail so can only imagine the hand wringing outrage you feel at a flippant comment.
You've far surpassed any level I've ever reached with this one. I don't and never have read the daily mail. Hardly a flippant comment, he put it in writing.
You strike me as an "ooh ah Daily Star" sort - am I correct?
No, you're wrong. No change there then.
Skyblue "Mary Whitehouse" Tony will not like these rib ticklers.
Think of the torture - think of World War 3
http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/kim-jong-un/a/kim-jong-un-jokes.htm
You've far surpassed any level I've ever reached with this one. I don't and never have read the daily mail. Hardly a flippant comment, he put it in writing.
No you are. North Korea are notorious for made up news items. It's a reference many make.You really are a complete tool.
To be fair I thought even that might be above your level.
No you are. North Korea are notorious for made up news items. It's a reference many make.
Stop being a plank.
Again you'd be wrong. There's a pattern forming here. So someone who thinks it's clever to post a link to childish jokes about a genocidal maniac dictator to try and get under the skin of someone who finds it distasteful, crass and stupid to compare a video promoting a game to the behavior of said genocidal maniac dictator also thinks that the star might be above my level. Doesn't say much about your level does it. If brains were dynamite you wouldn't have enough to blow your nose.
So was Nazi Germany. Would it be ok if he used them as a comparison?
You must read the daily Mail Tony, you try to take the moral high ground just like they do.
I bet you are offended by Dads Army aren't you Tony.
The only pattern is circles - you going round and round getting deeper in it with every nonsense post on this issue you make.
If he had said Goebells or Lord Haw Haw absolutely.
Perhaps we should compare SISU to them as well then . After all the Nazis moved people against their will also.
I think that's probably been done.
I don't remember the genocide scenes in them. Were they cut? Maybe it was a pilot issue.
You moron.
It involved portrayal of the home guard as old codgers. It mentioned -- Hitler
Is this you Tony?
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/154777/Dad-s-Army-board-game-banned-for-being-racist
Just when I think that you can't make yourself look any bigger of a twat you keep pushing and prove you can. Keep it up.
A whole range of organisations? Not sure it stands up to a great deal of scrutiny. You have the national bodies who are supposed to support grass roots anyway (similar to how the FA is responsible for football), then you have regional bodies (again the same is already in place with football), schools (long time since I was in school but I'm pretty sure they still play football), local teams and then the council and their chums.Do you know what I find is most worrying is how lacking in partnerships CCFC has become. If you go on the rugby website referred to there is a whole range of organisations buying in to the concept of a "city of rugby".
Exactly. Its not hard to look at the organisations involved in the city of rugby and work out why they're promoting rugby over football or any other sport.Difficult to build partnerships when all other organisations put personal differences ahead of the community.
I think you need to look more into what they club actually do. Just because the local media falls over themselves to cover Wasps and ignores the football club doesn't mean they aren't doing anything. SBITC have massive participation figures and do a huge amount of good work.As the senior football team in Coventry shouldn't CCFC be taking the lead?
To be fair ' it's a bit like "dad's army" on hereIt involved portrayal of the home guard as old codgers. It mentioned -- Hitler
Is this you Tony?
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/154777/Dad-s-Army-board-game-banned-for-being-racist
Moral high ground has nothing to do with it. I can only apologise for having the intellect to see the difference.
Oh yes the same intellect you use to compare posters who disagree with you to Nigel Farage, or to call Grendel 'Grendull'.
Pity your intellect doesn't know what the fuck irony is.
A whole range of organisations? Not sure it stands up to a great deal of scrutiny. You have the national bodies who are supposed to support grass roots anyway (similar to how the FA is responsible for football), then you have regional bodies (again the same is already in place with football), schools (long time since I was in school but I'm pretty sure they still play football), local teams and then the council and their chums.
Don't think we're exactly lacking in partners:
http://www.sbitc.org/about-us/partners-and-funders/
Exactly. Its not hard to look at the organisations involved in the city of rugby and work out why they're promoting rugby over football or any other sport.
I think you need to look more into what they club actually do. Just because the local media falls over themselves to cover Wasps and ignores the football club doesn't mean they aren't doing anything. SBITC have massive participation figures and do a huge amount of good work.
Oh yes the same intellect you use to compare posters who disagree with you to Nigel Farage, or to call Grendel 'Grendull'.
Pity your intellect doesn't know what the fuck irony is.
The real irony is the dimwit voted Ukip
Actually as my own son, his friends, and cousins have attended SBITC, I have spoken to staff and decision makers at SBITC and as you might expect regularly checked the financials, regularly praised its efforts on this forum, I have some idea of what fine work SBITC do thanks.
All I am suggesting is that CCFC (not SBITC ) takes a stronger more visible lead and rebuilds a power base in Coventry. Surprised such an idea is not encouraged but there you go. I don't enjoy our club becoming isolated or portrayed as a victim and somehow CCFC has to win or change hearts and minds. Part of that is the community stuff but it is much more than that which is why I referred to CCFC not SBITC
But while we are considering the community stuff
The City of Rugby thing hasn't really even cranked in to gear yet its a long term plan aimed at attracting a participation/fan base, The target groups are not unlimited in number, the Wasps academy isn't situated in Coventry yet, the Engage programme will use which facilities? the Wasps academy will use which facilities? who controls the better facilities in Coventry? who also uses those facilities? Where are the bases for each community project? what is the target age groups of Engage & SBITC? What funds are available? Is it a single funding project or a group of smaller slices of larger projects? Is there competition for funding/partners? how high is the profile locally? Who makes the sports provision decisions in Coventry? Who is driving the decisions of Engage or SBITC? What would be a way of reducing the pulling power of say another sporting community project?
So we just carry on as we are then, the City of Rugby is destined to fail.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?