covmark
Well-Known Member
Ha, you have more faith than me if you believe that NW.
Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
Ha, you have more faith than me if you believe that NW.Spin is extreme, it's reasonable to question why he didn't attend.
Of course there may have been an entirely reasonable reason, and I'm sure they'll be arranging another meeting ASAP as a result, eh...
Stand by your beds - Reid has spoken.
Apparently raising the point that Anderson failed to attend the meeting re CCFC Academy is "silly spin" and what should have happen is all the information be put in writing for the attention of CCFC.
Eerrrmmmm......surely the meeting was to discuss the information and try to find a way forward with all the relevant parties present!
Ha, you have more faith than me if you believe that NW.
Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
Let us say you are exhibiting a disturbing lack of cynicism.I wouldn't say 'faith' is the right word...
Let us say you are exhibiting a disturbing lack of cynicism.
Reid has offered clarification around his 'silly spin' comment -
Well when I say offered clarification, he's still trying to justify Anderson's lack of attendance at the meeting having pulled the plug at the eleven hour.
I also got someone who know me from on here tweet me to accuse me of being a Council or Wasps employee, or at least not a CCFC fan. Go and look at the tweets. Conspiracy theories make me laugh.
Why do the people who clearly aren't fans of Reid so closely monitor his output? If you don't like him and / or don't think he's a good reporter ignore him!
Because he's the official mouthpiece of the club where else would people get their info?Why do the people who clearly aren't fans of Reid so closely monitor his output? If you don't like him and / or don't think he's a good reporter ignore him!
Yep, same as the posters on here who love the Telegraph so much.Why do the people who clearly aren't fans of Reid so closely monitor his output? If you don't like him and / or don't think he's a good reporter ignore him!
Yep, not sure who @Studio2Stereo is on here but he also accused me of being a 'Wasps fan' stating it was obvious from my posts here and on Twitter, but failed to demonstrate the basis of the claim - and then blocked me :joyful:
Why do the people who clearly aren't fans of Reid so closely monitor his output? If you don't like him and / or don't think he's a good reporter ignore him!
Or maybe ban people who want to ensure only one point of view is heard?nick can you not ban these posters who have clearly joined SBT to peddle coucil agenda?
Or maybe ban people who want to ensure only one point of view is heard?
I've no idea.Who are they then?
So you avoid challenging CC4life requesting a ban but challenge Orca who responds to him? It's remains clear to me how it works on here.Who are they then?
So you avoid challenging CC4life requesting a ban but challenge Orca who responds to him? It's remains clear to me how it works on here.
It remains clear I just ignore him, the same as the fact I liked the BHSB post stating the fact yesterday
His posts challenge himself, I think that is obvious to anybody that reads them. 99% of the time they don't really need comment to prove him wrong or show him up.
The way I see it is that Orca puts out a reasoned argument for things that are happening and a few on here don't like it preferring to pick up and run with the likes of Les Reids selective writing.
I don't have a problem with disagreements. I do have a problem with people calling for others to be banned. If it's easier, I'll just ignore @covcity4life too and we can all move on.So people disagree with him on a forum, what is the problem?
As opposed to run with the likes of orcas selective posting?The way I see it is that Orca puts out a reasoned argument for things that are happening and a few on here don't like it preferring to pick up and run with the likes of Les Reids selective writing.
Grendel. I've no problem with you thinking whatever you want about me. I notice that you read my thread "Councillors" but didn't reply with your efforts. What have you done to try and protect the Academy I wonder?As opposed to run with the likes of orcas selective posting?
He clearly hates wasps though - he says it all the time.
Grendel. I've no problem with you thinking whatever you want about me. I notice that you read my thread "Councillors" but didn't reply with your efforts. What have you done to try and protect the Academy I wonder?
I'm being selective at the moment with my language towards you, but other than that, I'll continue to post whatever I feel like. Also, you might have spotted that when I'm proven wrong, I apologise and thank the person who put me right. I expect you'll be unable to do likewise.
I'm never wrong.
Whilst we await further news, I've found another email in the online planning portal regarding the Higgs site.
View attachment 5415
Seems pretty clear to me. Wasps are paying to move the pitch (as we've seen from the other comms), Wasps have offered 3 hours per day at normal commercial rates for the indoor facility. CCFC could hire CSF's facilities again and Paul Breed from CSF wants to have a chat about that. Should we start a new petition to force CA to talk to the other parties? That might have more of an impact that the other 'campaigns' we are seeing.
Nothing we didn't already know.
They won't be able to use the same CSF facilities as they won't exist - 2 of the remaining 4 pitch's will be exclusively wasps, and wasps will have exclusive access to the 3rd half of the time. When tbr swimming pool arrives the classroom, meeting room, physio room, etc that is currently next to the higgs indoor pitch will likely be replaced.
Wasps should bloody pay for the pitch to be relocated to the standard required, I won't be high fiving them for that, plus it will benefit them in the long run as it will be one of their 2 exclusive training pitches.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
I don't have a problem with disagreements. I do have a problem with people calling for others to be banned. If it's easier, I'll just ignore @covcity4life too and we can all move on.
Agreed and on point 2, plenty of commentators on this subject think CSF and Wasps should be saying what the proposal should be, but surely the onus is on CCFC to do that?Sorry Stu
But we can't keep hiding behind others.
Why should Wasps do anything. If they are investing 7 million into redeveloping it they can do what they like.
If we would like them to do stuff then we should either
1) build our own like we kept saying we would
Or
2) tell them what we would like them to add to their structure and offer a long term rental commitment up to the initial 7 years to justify them doing It for us.
see what?good job you wont see this!
Sorry Stu
But we can't keep hiding behind others.
Why should Wasps do anything. If they are investing 7 million into redeveloping it they can do what they like..
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?