Well reading that someone can't do basic maths surprise surprise,the rent is only 5% of total expenditure whch would mean outgoings of around £25m. ,or do they mean a fifth of expenditure .:thinking about:
definitely when you consider out player wage bill was reportedly only £5m and we've had a net income of about £2m in transfers this season. Even if the wage bill another £1m where is the other £16-17m per annum going that Mutton is proposing we're spending. And considering our turnover is about £9m - wouldn't that mean we would be losing £15-16m per annum?
This is the problem
all sides are saying halve truth's it's very difficult to say what is actually truth and with is lies.
1) Mutton - Rent is only 5% of ccfc's expenditure
2) ACL - The Ricoh isn't reliant on ccfc's income and could easily survive without it
3) ACL - We can't give ccfc a rent reduction because we're struggling to make a profit - i.e. we are reliant (at this moment) on ccfc's rent
And that's before you start considering the ccfc's quotes/soundbites.