Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Hamer (10 Viewers)

  • Thread starter Dimi_Konstantflapalot
  • Start date Sep 17, 2022
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • …
  • 8
Next
First Prev 2 of 8 Next Last

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2022
  • #36
SIR ERNIE said:
It's a red for both players.
Click to expand...
Out of interest, what's the rational for sending the Birmingham player off?

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
 

jimmyhillsfanclub

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2022
  • #37
stupot07 said:
Out of interest, what's the rational for sending the Birmingham player off?

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Hairstyle
 
Reactions: Philosoraptor, covhead1, Moff and 6 others

Finham

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2022
  • #38
Frostie said:
Even with the sky bluest of sky blue lenses I'm baffled people don't think that's a red...

Click to expand...
It's six of one and half a dozen of another, until Hamer kicks him in the head whilst looking directly at him. Shouldn't have lost his rag.
 
Reactions: stupot07

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2022
  • #39
stupot07 said:
Out of interest, what's the rational for sending the Birmingham player off?

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
It looked like the Birmingham player kicked out at Hamer first and was holding Hamers legs. I’m not entirely sure that Hamer caught him in the face either. Looked unmarked, unlike Godden’s shiner from mid week.
 

SIR ERNIE

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2022
  • #40
stupot07 said:
Out of interest, what's the rational for sending the Birmingham player off?

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Didn't like the c**t
 
Reactions: lordy_87, stupot07, TwistAndShoutCCFC1987 and 3 others

mark82

Super Moderator
  • Sep 17, 2022
  • #41
I still don't think that's intentional. Just my opinion though, will see what the club decide to do. Appreciate he has form for doing stupid shit so it's hard to give benefit of the doubt.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2022
  • #42
mark82 said:
I still don't think that's intentional. Just my opinion though, will see what the club decide to do. Appreciate he has form for doing stupid shit so it's hard to give benefit of the doubt.
Click to expand...

If we appeal that we we’ll probably risking getting another game ban there’s no way it’s going to be overturned
 
Reactions: skybluepm2

Tommo1993

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2022
  • #43
Club will probably not appeal because of the high cost. What is it, £50?
 
Reactions: SkyBlueSam01, skybluepm2, Saddlebrains and 2 others

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2022
  • #44
Tommo1993 said:
Club will probably not appeal because of the high cost. What is it, £50?
Click to expand...

Isnt there a risk that it’s deemed frivolous and you get an extra ban? What’s the appeal based on?
 

Fergusons_Beard

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2022
  • #45
What people have failed to realise is that it was clearly a foul on Hamer before he was on the floor having his legs held.

Exactly the same foul by Sheaf in the first half and he was yellowed.

Player came in and tackled at the side.

Just no consistency by refs.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
Reactions: Deleted member 9744, skybluepm2, jordan210 and 1 other person

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2022
  • #46
Asked if the club are going to appeal the decision, the City boss said: “I don’t know, I don’t think so. Not from first look.
 

Tommo1993

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2022
  • #47
Grendel said:
Isnt there a risk that it’s deemed frivolous and you get an extra ban? What’s the appeal based on?
Click to expand...

Suppose it’s set for close scrutiny now by Robins and co.
 

Finham

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2022
  • #48
jimmyhillsfanclub said:
Hairstyle
Click to expand...
That's just it isn't, he's an annoying bastard and we all want to kick him the head, but it is against the rules, sadly.
 

mark82

Super Moderator
  • Sep 17, 2022
  • #49
Grendel said:
Isnt there a risk that it’s deemed frivolous and you get an extra ban? What’s the appeal based on?
Click to expand...

Presumably no intent, no contact. I kind of agree though, regardless of my own opinion, these type of things rarely get overturned.
 
P

PVA

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2022
  • #50
Robins:

"It looked to me like he was being wrestled and [Hannibal] Mejbri was holding his legs, and I think Gus tried to get his legs away but then you run the risk."
 

mark82

Super Moderator
  • Sep 17, 2022
  • #51
Fergusons_Beard said:
What people have failed to realise is that it was clearly a foul on Hamer before he was on the floor having his legs held.

Exactly the same foul by Sheaf in the first half and he was yellowed.

Player came in and tackled at the side.

Just no consistency by refs.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Click to expand...

Their player got the ball first, Sheaf didn't.
 

Tommo1993

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2022
  • #52
PVA said:
Robins:

"It looked to me like he was being wrestled and [Hannibal] Mejbri was holding his legs, and I think Gus tried to get his legs away but then you run the risk."
Click to expand...

I still think it’s more of a wriggle at worst. Not karate kicks as people keep saying.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2022
  • #53
Tommo1993 said:
I still think it’s more of a wriggle at worst. Not karate kicks as people keep saying.
Click to expand...

Guess we will appeal then
 

Finham

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2022
  • #54
PVA said:
Robins:

"It looked to me like he was being wrestled and [Hannibal] Mejbri was holding his legs, and I think Gus tried to get his legs away but then you run the risk."
Click to expand...
Wasn't it more like "Gus has...then he's tried to...and then he's...and then you run the risk" It was an exercise in fill-in-the-blanks. Robins clearly censored himself.
 

Tommo1993

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2022
  • #55
Grendel said:
Guess we will appeal then
Click to expand...

Who knows. They may or mayn’t want to risk extra bans. I’m sure there have been many wrong rejections in the past - this still doesn’t mean it’s a red.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2022
  • #56
Finham said:
Wasn't it more like "Gus has...then he's tried to...and then he's...and then you run the risk" It was an exercise in fill-in-the-blanks. Robins clearly censored himself.
Click to expand...

Indeed he also said we’ll have to take it and move on
 
P

PVA

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2022
  • #57
Zero point in appealing, even if you think it wasn't a red it's not clear cut enough.
 
Reactions: djr8369, Sky_Blue_Dreamer and Esoterica

mark82

Super Moderator
  • Sep 17, 2022
  • #58
PVA said:
Robins:

"It looked to me like he was being wrestled and [Hannibal] Mejbri was holding his legs, and I think Gus tried to get his legs away but then you run the risk."
Click to expand...

I think that's exactly what happened to be fair. Just don't think there was any intent.
 

Frankly_Mr_Shankly

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2022
  • #59
He’s still our best player, just needs to curb his enthusiasm somewhat. We’d be a poorer team without him. Every team needs a Hamer type in their team.
 
Reactions: Sick Boy

mark82

Super Moderator
  • Sep 17, 2022
  • #60
Frankly_Mr_Shankly said:
He’s still our best player, just needs to curb his enthusiasm somewhat. We’d be a poorer team without him. Every team needs a Hamer type in their team.
Click to expand...

He'll be a massive loss if he misses the next 4 games.
 
Reactions: djr8369

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
  • Sep 17, 2022
  • #61
Frankly_Mr_Shankly said:
He’s still our best player, just needs to curb his enthusiasm somewhat. We’d be a poorer team without him. Every team needs a Hamer type in their team.
Click to expand...
No way is he our best player.
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
  • Sep 17, 2022
  • #62
He really is infuriating - if only the hype around him was actually reality, eh.
 

mark82

Super Moderator
  • Sep 17, 2022
  • #63
I don't get what people don't see in Hamer. He's infuriating, can be sloppy, but the talent is obvious. We're a better team when he's playing.
 
Reactions: djr8369, Deleted member 9744, skybluepm2 and 5 others

mark82

Super Moderator
  • Sep 17, 2022
  • #64
Assume those that don't rate him will be pleased that he's out for a few weeks.
 
Reactions: Deleted member 9744, eastwoodsdustman, Frankly_Mr_Shankly and 2 others

mds

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2022
  • #65
If we appeal and fail could the ban be extended, there is no mistaking that as violent play, and given the proximity to his head and lashing out three times is really not a good look to go to the EFL with..
 
P

PVA

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2022
  • #66
He's clearly not our best player but we're obviously a far better team with him than without
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
  • Sep 17, 2022
  • #67
mark82 said:
I don't get what people don't see in Hamer. He's infuriating, can be sloppy, but the talent is obvious. We're a better team when he's playing.
Click to expand...
We’re a better team when he’s playing but he’s a liability and it’s getting to the point where he’s costing us points because he can’t control himself.
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
  • Sep 17, 2022
  • #68
mds said:
If we appeal and fail could the ban be extended, there is no mistaking that as violent play, and given the proximity to his head and lashing out three times is really not a good look to go to the EFL with..
Click to expand...
There’s no way we’re going to appeal.
 
Reactions: Finham and PVA

Finham

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2022
  • #69
Frankly_Mr_Shankly said:
He’s still our best player, just needs to curb his enthusiasm somewhat. We’d be a poorer team without him. Every team needs a Hamer type in their team.
Click to expand...

 
Reactions: ccfcchris, Frankly_Mr_Shankly and Sick Boy

Balli001

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2022
  • #70
mark82 said:
Assume those that don't rate him will be pleased that he's out for a few weeks.
Click to expand...
So you are happy his indiscipline has cost us his services for 4 games? Thanks just making sure we are clear
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • …
  • 8
Next
First Prev 2 of 8 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 11 (members: 0, guests: 11)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?