Johhny Blue
Well-Known Member
Depends. Would your tank driver’s licence be Russian or Polish?
Depends. Would your tank driver’s licence be Russian or Polish?This is an interesting concept and i wonder if i drove a Russian tank to the Polish border and crossed half way over so the gun was in Poland but not the back end, would N.A.T.O take that as an invasion of Poland or not.
You’ll see the light eventually
Ah yes cuz this angle is so much better than the technology or angle from side on where it clearly isn’t full ball over the line. How are we this far in and people still not accepting it didn’t go in?! People really do believe what they want to believe.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It needed more grainit was a joke kneeleftmabbuttsgary lighten up. have u seen the still I produced.......PUSB
it was a joke kneeleftmabbuttsgary lighten up. have u seen the still I produced.......PUSB
I've never really been in an argument with David O'Day before and think people take it too far with the stuff they say about him, but maybe I was wrong. Lunatic.
Wow etc
If you use that photo you are assuming the ball is on the ground and i suspect it is off the the ground at the time of capture which isn't giving you the true pictureClearer picture. The trouble is, to state the obvious, the ball is round so in the absence of using a tee square to check the centre of the ball with the goal line, in my view it's a clear goal.
View attachment 24191
the ball was on the ground (could see from tv) the issue is the overhang of the part of the ball not on the ground, where around 1cm overhung the virtual line (not necessarily the actual line)If you use that photo you are assuming the ball is on the ground and i suspect it is off the the ground at the time of capture which isn't giving you the true picture
that doesn't mean that photo shown earlier in this thread had the ball on the ground, big assumptions are being made about a still photo from an acute angle i have seen the photo from the goal line technology which showed the ball didn't fully cross the line albeit by millimetres. Unless the technology is wrong then it didn't cross the linethe ball was on the ground (could see from tv) the issue is the overhang of the part of the ball not on the ground, where around 1cm overhung the virtual line (not necessarily the actual line)
Have you seen the actual photo used by Hawkeye, not the mock up shown on Quest?that doesn't mean that photo shown earlier in this thread had the ball on the ground, big assumptions are being made about a still photo from an acute angle i have seen the photo from the goal line technology which showed the ball didn't fully cross the line albeit by millimetres. Unless the technology is wrong then it didn't cross the line
Have you seen the actual photo used by Hawkeye, not the mock up shown on Quest?Seen from above which is where the Hawkeye is, there is overlap of the ball on the line so no goal. They were still cheating fuckers tho and don’t get me started on the fucking ref
Why wasn't it shown on the big screen In the ground at the time? When they showed every other save or near miss in the game.
Because we are trying to work out whether the ball was over the line or not.Why is this thread still going?
There’s an echo in here. However, on the extended highlights it shows what is described as the goal decision point, which is just before the defender clears the ball. That is too late in the incident, I would like to see where the ball was when it hit the grounded defenders back.Has anyone seen the actual photo used by Hawkeye, not the mock up shown on Quest?
There’s an echo in here. However, on the extended highlights it shows what is described as the goal decision point, which is just before the defender clears the ball. That is too late in the incident, I would like to see where the ball was when it hit the grounded defenders back.
We were abysmal, however 3 penalty shouts and a potential goal not given did contribute to the outcome.
Why? When we all know it wasn’t.Because we are trying to work out whether the ball was over the line or not.
Hello, hello, Hill's is back, hello hello.
It wasn't over the line you absolute fucking nutcases
Why is this thread still going?
But we all know that if we were playing till next week we still won’t score!Because there's still time 24 hours later to get an equaliser?
It would have counted if the earth was flat.Clearer picture. The trouble is, to state the obvious, the ball is round so in the absence of using a tee square to check the centre of the ball with the goal line, in my view it's a clear goal.
View attachment 24191
Because it’s the only thing worth discussing in the whole 90 minutesWhy is this thread still going?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?