Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Goal or no goal (6 Viewers)

  • Thread starter robbiekeane
  • Start date Mar 16, 2022
Forums New posts

Goal or no goal

  • Goal

    Votes: 105 76.1%
  • No goal

    Votes: 33 23.9%

  • Total voters
    138
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
Next
First Prev 6 of 8 Next Last
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 17, 2022
  • #176
David O'Day said:
wow
Click to expand...
hill83 said:
Wow etc
Click to expand...
David O'Day said:
We didn't deserve anything but wow
Click to expand...
David O'Day said:
you are just wow
Click to expand...
Liquid Gold said:
wow
Click to expand...
hill83 said:
Wow
Click to expand...

 
R

rexo87

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 17, 2022
  • #177
MalcSB said:
TheQuest still is too late in the incident. It’s a goal when it hits the back of the grounded player and bounces down, well over the line, before rolling back toward the goal line and being cleared as it approaches the line from inside th goal. The point at which Quest have made the assessment. So no, I haven’t ignored it, I have discounted it because they haven’t done it correctly.
Click to expand...
At no point was the ball over the line. As I said before goal line technology doesn't just take a random picture at any point and that's what they go off. As soon as the whole ball crosses the line the watch buzzes and its a goal. At no point this happened. You literally cannot argue with the technology unless it's not switched on which has happened once which they admitted straight away

Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
 
R

rexo87

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 17, 2022
  • #178
LMAF said:
You don’t even need to argue with technology. The camera angle on Quest is the perfect and angle and it’s clearly not in regardless of Hawkeye
Click to expand...
So are you saying the technology wasn't switched on? That's the only argument you can have because if it was on then as soon as the ball crosses the line the refs watch buzzes

Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 17, 2022
  • #179
rexo87 said:
So are you saying the technology wasn't switched on? That's the only argument you can have because if it was on then as soon as the ball crosses the line the refs watch buzzes

Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
Click to expand...


They are never going to admit it doesn’t always get it right as people will lose faith. Same if they had forgotten to turn it on it won’t be admitted again.

The more I have looked at it I think no goal but there are going to be differing views I am sure.
 
R

rexo87

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 17, 2022
  • #180
LMAF said:
Ey? No I’m saying it was on and it worked perfectly but you don’t even need it to see it’s not in anyway
Click to expand...
Sorry, completely misread. Agree with you hahah

Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: LMAF

Gosb

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 17, 2022
  • #181
I can't be bothered to read through this entire thread, so apologies if someone has already made this point, but the diameter of a football is about 9 inches so for the entire ball to be over the entire line the base of the ball has to be over 4 and a half inches over the entire line. This is what often deceives the naked eye when looking at ground level.
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 17, 2022
  • #182
rexo87 said:
At no point was the ball over the line. As I said before goal line technology doesn't just take a random picture at any point and that's what they go off. As soon as the whole ball crosses the line the watch buzzes and its a goal. At no point this happened. You literally cannot argue with the technology unless it's not switched on which has happened once which they admitted straight away

Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Technology fails, for example the stopped vehicle radar system on smart motorways which recently tragically resulted in yet another death on those abominations.
 
R

rexo87

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 17, 2022
  • #183
MalcSB said:
Technology fails, for example the stopped vehicle radar system on smart motorways which recently tragically resulted in yet another death on those abominations.
Click to expand...
Or the technology was correct and is better than grainy pictures on twitter

Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
 
S

skybluesam66

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 17, 2022
  • #184
so the 9 inch ball has to be fully over the 5 inches goalline
a total of 14 inches or 35 CM
apparently 1cm was not over so - 97% in , but not the 3 % that mattered.

Also the line has to be the exact width of the post, as they dont go on the line at all, but the actual posts - so it is possible that the line was faulty rather than the technology
 

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 17, 2022
  • #185
Sky Sports News questioning this morning if the technology worked.
 

Johnnythespider

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 17, 2022
  • #186
skybluesam66 said:
so the 9 inch ball has to be fully over the 5 inches goalline
a total of 14 inches or 35 CM
apparently 1cm was not over so - 97% in , but not the 3 % that mattered.

Also the line has to be the exact width of the post, as they dont go on the line at all, but the actual posts - so it is possible that the line was faulty rather than the technology
Click to expand...

This is an interesting concept and i wonder if i drove a Russian tank to the Polish border and crossed half way over so the gun was in Poland but not the back end, would N.A.T.O take that as an invasion of Poland or not.
 

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 17, 2022
  • #187
Seeing it from the proper angle I don't see a definite goal. It's all the other decisions that were shit, but then so were we so fuck it
 

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 17, 2022
  • #188
At the time when people were going mad I wasn´t convinced it had gone across the line. That said, I have seen it so many times I am basically drunk off it and now my eyes are playing tricks on me.

The club have a goal cam don´t they? Will be interesting to see if that has picked anything up because the camera is basically in the net. Might give a more clear cut view, but who knows.

Either way, we were absolutely shite and deserved nothing. This is a moot point really.
 
Reactions: ajsccfc

Nick

Administrator
  • Mar 17, 2022
  • #189
Earlsdon_Skyblue1 said:
At the time when people were going mad I wasn´t convinced it had gone across the line. That said, I have seen it so many times I am basically drunk off it and now my eyes are playing tricks on me.

The club have a goal cam don´t they? Will be interesting to see if that has picked anything up because the camera is basically in the net. Might give a more clear cut view, but who knows.

Either way, we were absolutely shite and deserved nothing. This is a moot point really.
Click to expand...

You would think the defender would be in the way.
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 17, 2022
  • #190
pusbccfc said:
Sky Sports News questioning this morning if the technology worked.
Click to expand...


They will never be able to prove it be bothered to try, for all we know it may not have been and they have used a stock image.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 17, 2022
  • #191
Terry Gibson's perm said:
They will never be able to prove it be bothered to try, for all we know it may not have been and they have used a stock image.
Click to expand...

Why would they do that?
 
Reactions: hill83

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 17, 2022
  • #192
skybluesam66 said:
so the 9 inch ball has to be fully over the 5 inches goalline
a total of 14 inches or 35 CM
apparently 1cm was not over so - 97% in , but not the 3 % that mattered.

Also the line has to be the exact width of the post, as they dont go on the line at all, but the actual posts - so it is possible that the line was faulty rather than the technology
Click to expand...

No, it doesn’t use the line from what I’ve read of Hawkeye, it basically makes it’s own virtual line where a perfect line would be.
 

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 17, 2022
  • #193
Do Championship clubs all have the goal line technology now? I didn't realise we had it at all until they started talking about it yesterday
 

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 17, 2022
  • #194
ajsccfc said:
Do Championship clubs all have the goal line technology now? I didn't realise we had it at all until they started talking about it yesterday
Click to expand...
Yeah it's something every team has to have in the league. Everyone coming up from L1 has to have it installed before the first game of the season.

We had it last season at St Andrews and it impacted our budget to have it installed a the arena because our tinpot setup didn't even think of it until it became urgent.

It's frustrated me a couple times this season as players have stopped for a second to appeal before realising technology is there and playing on, we've not pressed opportunities a couple of times this season because of it.
 
Reactions: ajsccfc
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 17, 2022
  • #195
ajsccfc said:
Do Championship clubs all have the goal line technology now? I didn't realise we had it at all until they started talking about it yesterday
Click to expand...

Not only do we have it, apparently it cost us more than £10,000 just to “connect the power” for it

Supporters forum 30/9/21

Coventry City Supporters Forum Agenda for Meeting on the 30th of September 2021 @ 5.00pm at the Sky Blue Tavern 1 - Apologies Laura Smith Kevin Heffernan Dave Eyles Neil Beasley Jim Brown 2 - Attendees Colin Henderson - Chair (CH) Pete Griffiths - Vice-Chair (PG) Dave Boddy (DB) Tynan...
www.skybluestalk.co.uk
 
Reactions: ajsccfc, Liquid Gold and SlowerThanPlatt

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 17, 2022
  • #196
SBT said:
Not only do we have it, apparently it cost us more than £10,000 just to “connect the power” for it

Supporters forum 30/9/21

Coventry City Supporters Forum Agenda for Meeting on the 30th of September 2021 @ 5.00pm at the Sky Blue Tavern 1 - Apologies Laura Smith Kevin Heffernan Dave Eyles Neil Beasley Jim Brown 2 - Attendees Colin Henderson - Chair (CH) Pete Griffiths - Vice-Chair (PG) Dave Boddy (DB) Tynan...
www.skybluestalk.co.uk
Click to expand...
I'm hoping that means lay the cables in the post and install the cameras on the roof and not just turn it on
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 17, 2022
  • #197
Liquid Gold said:
I'm hoping that means lay the cables in the post and install the cameras on the roof and not just turn it on
Click to expand...

O drivels job is to put the switch on - he fell asleep after a special brew too many - hence his salty response
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 17, 2022
  • #198
Grendel said:
Why would they do that?
Click to expand...


It cannot afford to ever be wrong or not be working as people will lose faith.
 

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 17, 2022
  • #199
Terry Gibson's perm said:
It cannot afford to ever be wrong or not be working as people will lose faith.
Click to expand...
There is a video from along the line
There is a hawkeye image
They check the watch before the game starts
It has failed before and they investigated why and admitted to it

There is fuck all to suggest anything went wrong last night apart form this desire to feel hard done by.
 
Reactions: mark82, hill83, GaryMabbuttsLeftKnee and 2 others

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 17, 2022
  • #200
Terry Gibson's perm said:
It cannot afford to ever be wrong or not be working as people will lose faith.
Click to expand...

well they won’t really they’d lose faith it tbe images were made up

the fact there are such wildly conflicting views shows it was extremely marginal. I’m sure the LWB system in cricket isn’t always right - it can’t predict to a millimetre where a ball would hit or not.
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 17, 2022
  • #201
Grendel said:
well they won’t really they’d lose faith it tbe images were made up

the fact there are such wildly conflicting views shows it was extremely marginal. I’m sure the LWB system in cricket isn’t always right - it can’t predict to a millimetre where a ball would hit or not.
Click to expand...


The cricket one is fairly quick so you see it accept it and move on, this one is produced after the game so allows for conspiracy if it had happened and then flashed on the scoreboard everybody would say wow that’s close and move on.
 
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 17, 2022
  • #202
I just want to say to all those who insist it was actually in - don’t give up now, not when you’re so close. They may come at you with incontrovertible evidence that it didn’t cross the line, but have faith - you’re still only three, maybe four more grainy screenshots of the same iFollow video away from blowing this whole thing wide open.
 
Reactions: hill83, Johhny Blue and ajsccfc

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 17, 2022
  • #203
Terry Gibson's perm said:
The cricket one is fairly quick so you see it accept it and move on, this one is produced after the game so allows for conspiracy if it had happened and then flashed on the scoreboard everybody would say wow that’s close and move on.
Click to expand...

it allows for conspiracy if you want it to. I don’t believe the technology wasn’t working - it was absurdly marginal but that’s that really
 
Reactions: Sick Boy

lifeskyblue

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 17, 2022
  • #204
The more I see it real speed the more it looks a goal. On the night (in line with 6yd box) a clear and obvious goal. When it’s slowed down I still think it’s over the line but not so convinced. But it’s clear from the still and technology it isn’t. It’s an optical illusion with moving ball and sliding player (especially when he throws his head back) giving impression of ball over line and rolling backwards towards goal line. No goal and the tech worked.
Not the reason we lost but if it had travelled a quarter inch further and fully crossed the line I would have been confident we would have at least snatched the draw. Coupled to the penalty shout on Tavares we could have got a vital point.
But to be fair Hull fully deserved the three points; they were busy, controlled the midfield, quick in tackle and the front player (without really looking good) proved to be a handful and got the better, in the tussles, of our defence. Put that with our performance of wasted possession, tired and leggy, woeful passing and a couple of howlers from Moore and Hyam alongside Hamers non marking (lost wandering ) at a corner it’s no wonder we came crashing down to earth after last Saturdays victory.
 
Reactions: skybluegod

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 17, 2022
  • #205
shmmeee said:
Middle of the line for me. It’s not logical, just feels wrong to me.

Genuine question is that the rule for all lines? Is a foul a mm into the pen area like a pen?
Click to expand...
You do notice that they (understandly) aren't as rigourous with things like throw-ins or even the goalline for corners/goalkicks. Seen plenty where the ball is not that far over the line and it been ruled out of play. On some throw-ins the ball has even been touching the line still and been called out of play.
 

ccfc922

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 17, 2022
  • #206
robbiekeane said:
WellView attachment 24171
Click to expand...

As others have said, is it possible that white line from their player skidding has effected the system?

Are the cameras/sensors only set up for the goal line?
 
S

skybluesam66

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 17, 2022
  • #207
ccfc922 said:
As others have said, is it possible that white line from their player skidding has effected the system?

Are the cameras/sensors only set up for the goal line?
Click to expand...
i think established the goal line is irrelevant, they are set up in line with the posts (which should be aligned - but maybe margin of error)
 
Reactions: ccfc922

Bugsy

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 17, 2022
  • #208
I don't know about anyone else but for me that was a definite goal.

 
Reactions: SBT, MusicDating and LMAF

GaryMabbuttsLeftKnee

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 17, 2022
  • #209
Bugsy said:
I don't know about anyone else but for me that was a definite goal.

View attachment 24184
Click to expand...

Ah yes cuz this angle is so much better than the technology or angle from side on where it clearly isn’t full ball over the line. How are we this far in and people still not accepting it didn’t go in?! People really do believe what they want to believe.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: Sick Boy, hill83, shmmeee and 3 others

Paxman II

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 17, 2022
  • #210
Lets see the goal cam view when it gets released?
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
Next
First Prev 6 of 8 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 7 (members: 0, guests: 7)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?