Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

GKs (7 Viewers)

  • Thread starter Domo
  • Start date Yesterday at 11:11 AM
Forums New posts

Domo

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 11:11 AM
  • #1
so, when Dovin comes back to fitness...would we just see him on the bench for the foreseeable? (personally hope we push to purchase Carl in Jan)
 

Robinshio

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 11:16 AM
  • #2
no sentiment Rushworth plays
 
Reactions: Captain Dart and Skyblueweeman

SkyBlue_Adam

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 11:25 AM
  • #3
Domo said:
so, when Dovin comes back to fitness...would we just see him on the bench for the foreseeable? (personally hope we push to purchase Carl in Jan)
Click to expand...

Rushworth will play out the season.. barring any dramatic form loss/injury

We have probably missed the boat to sign him permanently though which is a shame
 
Reactions: Londonccfcfan

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 11:26 AM
  • #4
SkyBlue_Adam said:
Rushworth will play out the season.. barring any dramatic form loss/injury

We have probably missed the boat to sign him permanently though which is a shame
Click to expand...

If we go up I think he'll sign, but will cost a lot more than the 5 mil we supposedly offered in the summer
 

Domo

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 11:31 AM
  • #5
there may have been an agreement to loan until jan then purchase?
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 11:36 AM
  • #6
Domo said:
there may have been an agreement to loan until jan then purchase?
Click to expand...

If ee don't go up I don't see us having the budget for Rushworth, Dovin and Wilson.
 

Robinshio

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 12:57 PM
  • #7
clint van damme said:
If ee don't go up I don't see us having the budget for Rushworth, Dovin and Wilson.
Click to expand...
ok lets just get rid of wilson
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 12:59 PM
  • #8
Robinshio said:
ok lets just get rid of wilson
Click to expand...

He's on long contract and happy to warm the bench.
I doubt he's going anywhere.
 

Skyblueweeman

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 1:00 PM
  • #9
Rushworth has more than earned his spot now. It's good really as it means we don't have to rush Dovin back.
 
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 1:30 PM
  • #10
clint van damme said:
If ee don't go up I don't see us having the budget for Rushworth, Dovin and Wilson.
Click to expand...
 
Reactions: SkyBlueSam01, Brylowes, Captain Dart and 2 others
O

old_wheat

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 2:20 PM
  • #11
Given that Doug is a trader by nature, it’s hard to believe he would have agreed to a loan deal without any option to buy — especially considering his clear stance on loan players since he arrived.

Our business model has always been built around using first-team opportunities to increase the value of our own players, allowing us to sell them on for profit.

Doug isn’t naive; he’d have known that if Carl performed exceptionally well, his market value would soar — and the club wouldn’t benefit from that development.

I wouldn’t be surprised if we structured a deal along the lines of: we initially bid £6m, it was rejected, and Brighton asked for £8m. So perhaps we agreed to a loan with a clause — something like, if we get promoted, we’ll have the option to buy at that £8m valuation. That way, both sides win.
 
Reactions: bulko, Sky Blue Pete and Domo

Balli001

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 4:21 PM
  • #12
old_wheat said:
Given that Doug is a trader by nature, it’s hard to believe he would have agreed to a loan deal without any option to buy — especially considering his clear stance on loan players since he arrived.

Our business model has always been built around using first-team opportunities to increase the value of our own players, allowing us to sell them on for profit.

Doug isn’t naive; he’d have known that if Carl performed exceptionally well, his market value would soar — and the club wouldn’t benefit from that development.

I wouldn’t be surprised if we structured a deal along the lines of: we initially bid £6m, it was rejected, and Brighton asked for £8m. So perhaps we agreed to a loan with a clause — something like, if we get promoted, we’ll have the option to buy at that £8m valuation. That way, both sides win.
Click to expand...
From everything i have read from both Brighton and Rushworth i would be astounded if there is any buy clause involved.
 
Reactions: StrettoBoy, Lamps, Old Warwickshire lad and 1 other person

Bad Boy

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 6:37 PM
  • #13
Whoever is in form gets the gloves in my book.
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 7:00 PM
  • #14
old_wheat said:
Given that Doug is a trader by nature, it’s hard to believe he would have agreed to a loan deal without any option to buy — especially considering his clear stance on loan players since he arrived.

Our business model has always been built around using first-team opportunities to increase the value of our own players, allowing us to sell them on for profit.

Doug isn’t naive; he’d have known that if Carl performed exceptionally well, his market value would soar — and the club wouldn’t benefit from that development.

I wouldn’t be surprised if we structured a deal along the lines of: we initially bid £6m, it was rejected, and Brighton asked for £8m. So perhaps we agreed to a loan with a clause — something like, if we get promoted, we’ll have the option to buy at that £8m valuation. That way, both sides win.
Click to expand...
I feel pretty sure Brighton are keeping him and see him as their next first choice goalie maybe not next season but soon enough, he is still very young for a goalie.
 
Reactions: StrettoBoy

blunted

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 7:27 PM
  • #15
SkyBlue_Adam said:
Rushworth will play out the season.. barring any dramatic form loss/injury

We have probably missed the boat to sign him permanently though which is a shame
Click to expand...
Or recall
 

Lamps

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 2:47 AM
  • #16
clint van damme said:
He's on long contract and happy to warm the bench.
I doubt he's going anywhere.
Click to expand...
He keeps going out on loan. That's a big upheaval each season. I can't see how he would prefer to play for a different club each season than join someone like us where he would have a permanent club especially as we're going places.

There's no agreement on him moving to us permanently but his contract is getting shorter. They have a younger GK ahead of him. They will most probably sell him in the next 18 months. The snag is the asking price, but if we get promoted we would need him to have a decent chance of staying up.

Dovin? You never know how a player will be after a bad injury and time out of the game. But a very good back up for Rushworth and would have to wait for his chance.
 

Alkhen

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 3:06 AM
  • #17
No rush, bar any weird loan breaks or recall we have him until the end of the season. He's been in good form but not flawless, the pen lunge Saturday was pretty naive. I'd take him 100% on perm but in Jan if budget is tight I'd rather direct that at adding to the squad depth to try and push for promotion this season. If we do go up then we'll have plenty to spend to secure him. I'd not write off Dovin either. He was getting better and better until the injury.
 

Lamps

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 4:51 AM
  • #18
Alkhen said:
No rush, bar any weird loan breaks or recall we have him until the end of the season. He's been in good form but not flawless, the pen lunge Saturday was pretty naive. I'd take him 100% on perm but in Jan if budget is tight I'd rather direct that at adding to the squad depth to try and push for promotion this season. If we do go up then we'll have plenty to spend to secure him. I'd not write off Dovin either. He was getting better and better until the injury.
Click to expand...
I don't totally blame him for the penalty. He doesn't know what's going on behind him and seemed to get the ball first. If the player had cut the ball back it would have been for an empty net.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • 38 minutes ago
  • #19
Lamps said:
He keeps going out on loan. That's a big upheaval each season. I can't see how he would prefer to play for a different club each season than join someone like us where he would have a permanent club especially as we're going places.

There's no agreement on him moving to us permanently but his contract is getting shorter. They have a younger GK ahead of him. They will most probably sell him in the next 18 months. The snag is the asking price, but if we get promoted we would need him to have a decent chance of staying up.

Dovin? You never know how a player will be after a bad injury and time out of the game. But a very good back up for Rushworth and would have to wait for his chance.
Click to expand...

Was on about Wilson in response to someone saying we should get rid of him.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • TomRad854 minutes ago
  • AngryAnt13 minutes ago
  • ... and 1 more.
  • Total: 8 (members: 3, guests: 5)
    Share:
    Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
    • Home
    • Forums
    • Coventry City Football Club
    • Coventry City General Chat
    • Default Style
    • Contact us
    • Terms and rules
    • Privacy policy
    • Help
    • Home
    Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
    Menu
    Log in

    Register

    • Home
    • Forums
      • New posts
      • Search forums
    • What's new
      • New posts
      • Latest activity
    • Members
      • Current visitors
    • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
    X

    Privacy & Transparency

    We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

    • Personalized ads and content
    • Content measurement and audience insights

    Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

    X

    Privacy & Transparency

    We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

    • Personalized ads and content
    • Content measurement and audience insights

    Do you accept cookies and these technologies?