Well said, that's 2 clubs who have spoke against ACL, now it's time for our fans to rally behind not SISU, but CCFC to get a better rent agreement.
That is probably the only letter from the 71 clubs that supports SISU. Just the club trying to use it as propaganda.
Well said, that's 2 clubs who have spoke against ACL, now it's time for our fans to rally behind not SISU, but CCFC to get a better rent agreement.
Well said, that's 2 clubs who have spoke against ACL, now it's time for our fans to rally behind not SISU, but CCFC to get a better rent agreement.
Well said, that's 2 clubs who have spoke against ACL, now it's time for our fans to rally behind not SISU, but CCFC to get a better rent agreement.
I agree - that is what the Trust should do.
Maybe next week they will organise a protest against ACL at the Ricoh?
Are you serious, or taking the piss?
It's called "The Taylor Tombola Book Of Facts , Conjecture or Inane Bollocks" trouble is you don't know which one you are going to get :jerkit:
What a load of Shite, as far as I can see its not about who says what or who you support in this crap.
Only ONE group are taking the club away from Coventry and that not ACL.
Do you have a date for that on the ITV site?What about when ACL denied us the chance to renegotiate the rent.
Before you say, Fisher made a statement about this, and before you say 'don't believe a word Fisher says', ACL failed to release a counter-statement and if this wasn't the case, ACL would've been quick to dismiss what Fisher said, but they didn't.
All on ITV if you don't believe me.
May I ask again, if ACL refuses to talk about a rent agreement, what are CCFC supposed to do?
Do you have a date for that on the ITV site?
What about when ACL denied us the chance to renegotiate the rent.
Before you say, Fisher made a statement about this, and before you say 'don't believe a word Fisher says', ACL failed to release a counter-statement and if this wasn't the case, ACL would've been quick to dismiss what Fisher said, but they didn't.
All on ITV if you don't believe me.
May I ask again, if ACL refuses to talk about a rent agreement, what are CCFC supposed to do?
You keep spouting the same old nonsense, ACL didn't refuse to negotiate, ACL refused to negotiate any further after a year of negotiating and producing a final offer, SISU rejected the final offer hence nothing further to discuss.
just let them have cody but apparently we arent being told the whole truth, noggin seems to have it spot on
I can do one better:
Bit of spin, but the last line interests me.
James Powell of law firm Walker Morris via BBC site said:"Indeed, ACL has already committed a significant level of funding to ensure that the pitch is improved for next season, after the club ceased to commit investment in the pitch towards the end of last season.
"So that there can be no doubt whatsoever among Sky Blues fans, ACL would be delighted for Coventry City Football Club to play at the Ricoh Arena next season. Nobody connected to the football club has yet approached ACL in this regard."
Same Lawyer via Cove Telegraph said:“Previous statements have been made on behalf of Coventry City Football Club (Holdings) Limited, who implied that they owned the football club.
"We have asked Holdings to provide evidence for this assertion and they have refused to respond.
"We note today’s statement by Mr Fisher does not now purport to be on behalf of Holdings.
Answer to the post above yours (mine).
Dated 3rd of May, months after we rejected the last offer, Fisher come out, says ACL rejected offer to come back to the table and ACL have been silent (because it's incredibly likely to be true, why would they be silent if it wasn't true?) and for all we know, a deal could've been struck.
People are ignoring this because its convent for them, so I'll carry on with the same rhetoric so people get the truth.
Answer to the post above yours (mine).
Dated 3rd of May, months after we rejected the last offer, Fisher come out, says ACL rejected offer to come back to the table and ACL have been silent (because it's incredibly likely to be true, why would they be silent if it wasn't true?) and for all we know, a deal could've been struck.
People are ignoring this because its convent for them, so I'll carry on with the same rhetoric so people get the truth.
whats to negociate, acl said that was their final offer, many on here said we shouldve taken it but yet timmy still wanted to get more of a cut in rent... after admitting he tried to bankrupt acl
But the lawyers acting for ACL did respond, same day.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/england/22396786
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/sport/football/football-news/coventry-city-look-new-ground-3408250
I agree with much of what was said in that letter. Take the rent issue in isolation and I stand with the club.
You cannot take the rent issue in isolation though, you have to view it in the context of everything else that has happened under SISU, and as we all know, they have been an unmitigated disaster. I just hope we emerge from this mess with new owners, can't stand the thought of this dragging on much longer.
To be fair,he is only ten.Taylor doesn't seem to grasp that once a final offer is made that's it. SISU initially agreed to their final offer then decided against it knowing full well that ACL weren't prepared to bend over anymore
Taylor doesn't seem to grasp that once a final offer is made that's it. SISU initially agreed to their final offer then decided against it knowing full well that ACL weren't prepared to bend over anymore
To be fair,he is only ten.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?