Grendel
Well-Known Member
This isn’t in reality how VAR works is it?
This isn’t in reality how VAR works is it?Nope. In that scenario yesterday, no.
It's such a close call isn't it. So, I think, as VAR, you look at it and if it's that close, you go with the on-field decision. So if the linesman raised his flag, that's what you go with.
There wasn't enough evidence to overturn it. Should be like in cricket.
No clear and obvious error whichever way the officials called it yesterday. Should have gone with that.
Sadly it’s not. We need a new CSVARThis isn’t in reality how VAR works is it?
Hence why he said ‘should’ multiple timesThis isn’t in reality how VAR works is it?
Limit of if they have to start drawing lines it isn't obvious and they go with on field decision.So what non-tiny margin would you use? There has to be some sort of limit, and any event at or near that limit would cause the same sort of discussion/uproar
No. It would be common sense though to implement it that way.This isn’t in reality how VAR works is it?
No. It would be common sense though to implement it that way.
I have consistently said, VAR needs fine-tuning and changing, because as it stands, it is detrimental to the game
Or even have a clear definition of when the ball is deemed to be playedIt needs to be, Pete.
In order of importance I’d be fine with:Or even have a clear definition of when the ball is deemed to be played
That’s it email doing into John Taylor coo saying he has our full auppprt to ask for pictures and audio and to clarify the playing of the ball as it appears the wrong still is being used
They should demand compensation
In order of importance I’d be fine with:
1. Compensation
2. The audio
3. An apology
Pushing nonsense is wanting Robins sacked every seasonI think fortunately King and Robins are more sensible than pushing nonsense like that
What’s nonsense about asking for clarity on the law and some transparencyI think fortunately King and Robins are more sensible than pushing nonsense like that
What’s nonsense about asking for clarity on the law and some transparency
Nobody is suggesting going down the Forest route of threatening legal action. Just some transparency about what happened and some official acceptance that they fucked up.It’s bonkers as it suggests a conspiracy and suddenly we along with Forest fight some stupid campaign we can’t win
For the record I think VAR is a joke system and should be scrapped but it’s not a hill to die on
Nobody is suggesting going down the Forest route of threatening legal action. Just some transparency about what happened and some official acceptance that they fucked up.
Howard Webb apologises on behalf of PGMOL most weeks
Yes as in the missed prize money not a lawsuitYou said push for compensation?
Yes as in the missed prize money not a lawsuit
It isn’t the EFL’s competition for a start. We are talking about a winning goal with essentially the last kick of the game. The money is of no consequence to Man Utd eitherSo how do you get that without taking on the EFL and setting a precedent?
It isn’t the EFL’s competition for a start. We are talking about a winning goal with essentially the last kick of the game. The money is of no consequence to Man Utd either
‘Take on’, it’s a request to be made, nothing like what Forest are doing.Oh ok so it’s the FA and / or Man U you want to take on?
Bit silly and hot headed - hence my original comment
‘Take on’, it’s a request to be made, nothing like what Forest are doing.
Bit silly and hot headed to want Robins sacked every time we go through a sticky patch yet it never stops you
Asking for compensation isn’t a request - it’s trying to get an admission of wrong doing and setting a precedent
Then we revert to option 2 and ask for the audioAsking for compensation isn’t a request - it’s trying to get an admission of wrong doing and setting a precedent
Did Greggs get banned again? What for this time?
Yeah, won't happen and pointless to even try going up that blind alley. Calling for more transparency is probably more realistic, I would love an explanation for yesterday.
Then we revert to option 2 and ask for the audio
I see it as just providing clarity.Again though it’s questioning integrity and will achieve nothing
it’s not the worst miscarriage of justice in a semi final at Wembley - poor decisions happen
An explanation for a decision that virtually everyone who has seen it thinks is wrongWhy? What will this achieve?
Pete, thinking about this, the definition is played or touched, with touched being defined as first point of contact.Or even have a clear definition of when the ball is deemed to be played
That’s it email doing into John Taylor coo saying he has our full auppprt to ask for pictures and audio and to clarify the playing of the ball as it appears the wrong still is being used
They should demand compensation
I don’t watch Family Guy so don’t get it
Sisu batter people in court.Yes as in the missed prize money not a lawsuit
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?