Otis
Well-Known Member
Which of the parties manifestos DOES look honest? Any of them?
Which of the parties manifestos DOES look honest? Any of them?I am a remainer. But I am not falling for the bullshit. Can't you see that Labour are pledging the financial stability of the UK? Can't you see that they are pledging what can't be done in the timescale they say?
It doesn't make their manifesto look an honest one.
Slim majority? The longer this goes on the bigger the majority. This is why I am pissed off with the way Labour are going into this GE.
So answer the one question. Labour have said they will renegotiate leaving. The EU have said no more renegotiating. So why now and change what has been said?
But they did provide 200,000 temporary accommodations for the homeless. Does this count? It only costs billions a year which is wasted.Fucking hell Dom. They promised 200,000 In their last manifesto have never built 1. Let me reiterate that, not a single 1.
They now have someone in charge with a worse track record of lying than May, so why do you believe it? I find it incredible.
So did that help answer the question?
How will the agreement be renegotiated. Is this wrong?
Let me remind you. Because you seem to have a poor memory. The EU have said they will not renegotiate. Labour say they will renegotiate. Try answering without twisting what I say. Then you will find it harder to defend McDonnell and Corbyn.
True, but Coventry North West is solidly Labour, so you can see the intent there.you could argue that its designed to mimic a tabloid front page (red top etc) as opposed to a Labour leaflet.
Umm, mainly because he was talking bullshit wasn't it?Thought Boris smashed the leaders debate Friday night after how hostile and bias the audience was, was a disgrace how many times he was interrupted
Umm, mainly because he was talking bullshit wasn't it?
That's the Mail, so I will pass I think, thanks.He didn't have a chance to even speak, every other leader had plenty of time however Boris didn't
BBC faces bias row after Boris Johnson is confronted by hostile audience on Question Time | Daily Mail Online
Because I understand what has been going on?You're beyond help
Why? Its pointing out actual factsThat's the Mail, so I will pass I think, thanks.
So answer the one question. Labour have said they will renegotiate leaving. The EU have said no more renegotiating. So why now and change what has been said?
EU ‘open to’ Labour’s Brexit policy, says Ireland’s Leo VaradkarThe EU is “open to” Labour’s Brexit policy of renegotiating the Brexit agreement to include a customs union and single market membership, Leo Varadkar has said.
Asked about the Labour manifesto the Irish leader told public broadcaster RTE that the bloc would be “very happy” with sitting down with “whoever is prime minister” and that the opposition’s policy would not be a problem.
There is no hope for you.Tell Astute, Labour under Blair and Corbyn are exactly the same thing
Would prefer to hear it from someone from the EU. Because as we know we keep getting reminded that it won't get renegotiated.
None of them. They are all talking bullshit. But what gets me is the one that can't be done because of timescales set is the one which is supposed to be the best.Which of the parties manifestos DOES look honest? Any of them?
Power companies transfer ownership offshore to protect against Corbyn's renationalisation | Daily Mail Online
So it begins, well done Labour! Not
Have you seen the polls?I'm happy to see how the results play out but it will, unfortunately for the stability of the country, be either a hung Parliament or the slim majority that Boris can hope for at best.
The EU have said no more renegotiating. But this refers more renegotiation along the lines of the hard Brexit which the Conservatives have pursued. As we know, there are any proponents within the Labour party (including their most ardent supporters) who want to pursue softer economic terms and not forfeit, for instance, free movement. In which case it is not inconceivable for the EU to agree to go back to the negotiating table.
Them setting up overseas holding companies is the best argument they could make as to why they should be renationalised.it doesn't make any difference, millions will flow out of the country to foreign investors instead of being invested in infrastructure and used to reduce bills no matter where the company is registered.
For what it's worth, and as I've said before, I wouldn't renationalise for the sake of it and I would start with failing rail franchises and water.
No one has answered the questions I asked last week regarding the current models of rail and water ownership.
He didn't have a chance to even speak, every other leader had plenty of time however Boris didn't
BBC faces bias row after Boris Johnson is confronted by hostile audience on Question Time | Daily Mail Online
Maybe it shows the ill feeling to what he is doing.Thought Boris smashed the leaders debate Friday night after how hostile and bias the audience was, was a disgrace how many times he was interrupted
The manifesto says Labour would renegotiate the agreement. Is this a lie?What manifesto goes through the methodology of reaching an agreement. What's the point of that?
It most probably did him a favour.He didn't have a chance to even speak, every other leader had plenty of time however Boris didn't
BBC faces bias row after Boris Johnson is confronted by hostile audience on Question Time | Daily Mail Online
What questions were they?it doesn't make any difference, millions will flow out of the country to foreign investors instead of being invested in infrastructure and used to reduce bills no matter where the company is registered.
For what it's worth, and as I've said before, I wouldn't renationalise for the sake of it and I would start with failing rail franchises and water.
No one has answered the questions I asked last week regarding the current models of rail and water ownership.
Have you seen why they have?Them setting up overseas holding companies is the best argument they could make as to why they should be renationalised.
Have you seen the polls?
Hard Brexit? That is leaving without an agreement. Or didn't you know this?
Nope, I thought I'd just ignore it altogether and type in a randomly generated answer.Have you seen why they have?
May not yes. But you state it as a certainty.You do realise that the polls say little about how seats will be allocated? Even the greatest of leads may not translate to big majorities in seats - see John Curtice.
Yes I do realise what it means, and it is the most likely outcome in the even that the Conservatives do not win a strong majority. We will have No Deal by the end of 2020 and this will be good for neither the EU nor the UK.
I believe you.Nope, I thought I'd just ignore it altogether and type in a randomly generated answer.
You really have to ask?!? As a LABOUR VOTER, you have to ask?!?Or why did you say it is why it should be bought out for that reason?
As a pension holder that has been hit enough already?You really have to ask?!? As a LABOUR VOTER, you have to ask?!?
Tony Blair saying that he doesn't want Labour to get a majority!!! Says it all about Corbyn
Crazy
Says far more about Blair.Tony Blair saying that he doesn't want Labour to get a majority!!! Says it all about Corbyn
Crazy
Then hopefully you'll take my criticism that constantly setting yourself up as arbiter of the truth, and stater of facts is not a good look, especially when it comes to perspectives.You are much more balanced than most on this type of thread.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?