SkyBlueDom26
Well-Known Member
It’s just bants some people literally have no humour, I say @Ian1779 is wrong all the time
It’s just bants some people literally have no humour, I say @Ian1779 is wrong all the timeWhat's weird with you is that you ignore Ian predicting Labour will come through but go after those who have been predicting Tory wins from the start.
You're a c**t.It’s just bants some people literally have no humour, I say @Ian1779 is wrong all the time
It’s just bants some people literally have no humour, I say @Ian1779 is wrong all the time
Yeah they get annoyed when people make puns out of their names
Dim Dim Dim ahhhhh so angry
Domass I like thatConDom
Dim
Domass
Just bants though mate
YouGov's latest MRP polled over 100,000 people. I could understand if the polls were showing within margin of error or even 5% but none of them have. Time to face facts Corbyn should never have agreed to this election.
There are some interesting assumptions behind that data though. They are projecting 18-30 turnout to be well below 2017 levels and 65+ turnout to be higher than any time since the early 60s.YouGov's latest MRP polled over 100,000 people. I could understand if the polls were showing within margin of error or even 5% but none of them have. Time to face facts Corbyn should never have agreed to this election.
Corbyn was bounced into the election and only agreed in the end cos that numbskull Swinson and wee Nicola thought it was in their parties’ interests and broke ranks with Labour. Swinson I think has got it spectacularly wrong and Sturgeon I don’t believe will wipe out the tories north of the border.
Corbyn was bounced into the election and only agreed in the end cos that numbskull Swinson and wee Nicola thought it was in their parties’ interests and broke ranks with Labour. Swinson I think has got it spectacularly wrong and Sturgeon I don’t believe will wipe out the tories north of the border.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
There are some interesting assumptions behind that data though. They are projecting 18-30 turnout to be well below 2017 levels and 65+ turnout to be higher than any time since the early 60s.
Good grief, really poor from the state broadcasting serviceBBC are having an absolute mare....
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
There is no way any journalist, let alone one of her experience and seniority, doesn't know you can't do what she did. You can't even report on exit polls until after all voting ends.Fact is IF she was just trying to be first to report for her own ego she needs to be put through the mill. IF she is found to be deliberately breaching the rules she deserves to have the rulebook (coz it's no doubt humongous) thrown in her smug face & be dismissed
What law has she broken?There is no way any journalist, let alone one of her experience and seniority, doesn't know you can't do what she did. You can't even report on exit polls until after all voting ends.
Don’t think you’ll find anyone that says he will get a majority.... but then he doesn’t need one.
I think she meant 'desires' didn't she.BBC are having an absolute mare....
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
The methodology they use isn't necessarily reflective of the electorate. I've said a Tory majority of <10. I've never met anybody who has been polled.
Mentioned this last night but the weightings they are using seem way off to me. This tweet shows it well.YouGov's latest MRP polled over 100,000 people. I could understand if the polls were showing within margin of error or even 5% but none of them have.
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1983/2What law has she broken?
Mentioned this last night but the weightings they are using seem way off to me. This tweet shows it well.
A 65% youth turnout last time dropping to 52% this time while the pensioner vote increases 10-15% seems off to me. Could be significant as those two age groups are the ones who largely support one party, the youth vote going to Labour and the pensioner vote to Conservative.
Given how tight some of the marginals are, a 1% swing can equate to 10 seats or even in some circumstances as many as 20 seats, either or both of those turnout predictions being wrong and the actual turnout being nearer the level of the last election could make a huge difference.
Labour has a majority for anyone under the age of 40. Reasons on a postcard
That bloke even looks a bit like Grendull. Too tall but other than that
because most are gullible and when reap the benefits of capitalism vote Tory - your 75 year old Tory voter now was banning the bomb back in the day
And this is the issue with politics in this country. People entrenched in their voting habits.I'm earning comfortably above the average salary but still won't vote for them. How many 0s need to be in my pay packet before I change?
Not Tory doesn't mean always voting one party.And this is the issue with politics in this country. People entrenched in their voting habits.
You're basically saying you'd never ever vote Tory, no matter your personal situation.
Most people could say the same. Lets face it unless you live in one of a handful of marginals you might as well not bother voting.I live in John Glens constituency. There is not a cat in hells chance he will lose. So what's the fucking point in me voting. (I will be voting btw)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?