Otis
Well-Known Member
I haven't heard anything about the Syrian kid.
I will have to Google it. Didn't see a story about that anywhere.
I haven't heard anything about the Syrian kid.Can anybody who knows more about me about this sort of thing explain more about the stuff he said about that incident with the Syrian kid and how that's terror related?
It isn't much different from the spin on the whole airport incident and lawyers getting on the spin bandwagon.
Teachers paid off with NDA not to discuss the kid being a c**t and what actually happened?
Obviously there's context and 2 sides.
The allegations about the lad not being very nice? I don't get it. Hasn't he spoken to the head teacher, other kids and school stuff who all agreed with him?Terror legislation is vague and all encompassing cos “terrorism” isn’t really a thing other than “crimes I really don’t like” so could be all sorts there. Perhaps inciting hatred hate preacher laws?
The video was labelled as contempt of court because it repeats allegations about the Syrian lad which have already been proven false in court and Robinson had to pay £100k damages so it’s just repeating the libel he’s already been found guilty of: hence contempt of court.
He wants a legal battle and a prison sentence because it’s extremely profitable for him.
This is the film, found it on Rumble... haven't watched all of it.
Just sharing as information only.
The allegations about the lad not being very nice? I don't get it. Hasn't he spoken to the head teacher, other kids and school stuff who all agreed with him?
After the whole Manchester airport thing and those walking free, it's a bit of an own goal to arrest him today (if he has broken laws then obviously he isn't immune to them) but all it will do is get more people to support him.
I thought we were against the police not arresting people breaking the law out of fear for how their community will react?
I'm not saying he shouldn't be arrested, if he has actually then it's a bit of an own goal to go round and arrest him this morning while the 2 from the airport are still free.
It actually plays into his hands.
Him and the Manchester group are peas in a pod quite frankly.
He knows what he’s doing. Either you let him off or you arrest him when he breaks the law. He makes his money by playing the martyr. Him and the Manchester group are peas in a pod quite frankly.
I dont know the details of the Syrian lad case, I just know the judgement. Pissing off judges for likes if the definition of play stupid games, same as punching armed police.
And what do you have to buy in order to get this free Tommy?I see #FreeTommy is now trending.
A grifter has got to grift, I suppose.
And what do you have to buy in order to get this free Tommy?
I'm not saying let him off either. Far from it.
Trying to understand what laws the video broke? Is it contempt if he's got people on video saying they were paid to stay quiet by a council? Surely if people are being paid or scared not to testify or speak that's also contempt?
A judge decided his claims couldn’t be proven and put an injunction in against him repeating them.
EDL founder Tommy Robinson loses libel case brought by Syrian schoolboy
Tommy Robinson is told to pay damages and legal costs after a judge says his attempts to prove his allegations in court had fallen "woefully short".news.sky.com
He’s had three years to appeal if he doesn’t agree but just breaking a court order is stupid, even if you disagree with it.
Again though, if it's true that claims can't be proven IF a council paid out hush money and mobs scared others. Surely there's a point?
Allegedly the video actually shows somebody who was attacked by the lad and statements from people who worked at the school. They refused to go to court because of pay offs or being scared.
If we hadn't seen the CCTV from the airport then those 2 lads would still be playing the victim for compo.
Oh no I get that, I'm just asking from a legal stand point how things like that worked.He's got injunction against him, the content isn't really relevant.
Whether the injunction is justified or not isn't really the issue.
Oh no I get that, I'm just asking from a legal stand point how things like that worked.
If I said something about you but you paid people off who could prove it and took me to court. Then after that happens I get people on film saying I was right but they couldn't go to court because you had paid them. What happens then?
I watch too many crime docs but surely the judge / courts should ask if these people had actually been paid off and if so, why?
On the other hand, would getting called to court over ride an NDA?
Yeah that's what I would have thought.I'm not sure NDAs are that legally binding but could be wrong. I think breaking one can lead to further legal action but I don't think they carry the weight of a court injunction but I'm prepared to be put right on that if it's not correct.
I see #FreeTommy is now trending.
A grifter has got to grift, I suppose.
Must be my failing eyesight, because I definitely read that as the "gofuckme" page at first.Anyone got the link to the gofundme page ?
Well it didn't but now it seems so, should it come in?I don’t agree with them in any way, but surely not allowing PR just fuels this kind of issue in the long term?
The RE teacher in Batley too, teachers paid off, plenty of black and Asian people there too, black ex serviceman, I'm not going to say to much as most on this forum seem very left wing, it's a free country and free speech, if people want to celebrate Britain don't see a problemAgain though, if it's true that claims can't be proven IF a council paid out hush money and mobs scared others. Surely there's a point?
Allegedly the video actually shows somebody who was attacked by the lad and statements from people who worked at the school. They refused to go to court because of pay offs or being scared.
If we hadn't seen the CCTV from the airport then those 2 lads would still be playing the victim for compo.
Is it terrorism though, its said that he has been arrested under counter terrorism laws.He's got injunction against him, the content isn't really relevant.
Whether the injunction is justified or not isn't really the issue.
Is it terrorism though, its said that he has been arrested under counter terrorism laws.
What I don’t understand is why there has apparently been no statement by the arresting authority.Every report Ive seen has the arrested under anti terrorism laws in quotation marks.
I think that's because the source is his twitter.
If it is anti terrorism then it surely can't be related to a contempt of court charge can it?
What I don’t understand is why there has apparently been no statement by the arresting authority.
In what way is Robinson celebrating Britain?The RE teacher in Batley too, teachers paid off, plenty of black and Asian people there too, black ex serviceman, I'm not going to say to much as most on this forum seem very left wing, it's a free country and free speech, if people want to celebrate Britain don't see a problem
Be a bloody big mob if he hasn't been arrested, as it won't be possible to release him!I also see there's a mob gathering outside Downing St demanding his release
This government has just said they are going to repeal a bill supporting free speech in higher education. Anyone thinking this is a free country with free speech is sadly mistaken,The RE teacher in Batley too, teachers paid off, plenty of black and Asian people there too, black ex serviceman, I'm not going to say to much as most on this forum seem very left wing, it's a free country and free speech, if people want to celebrate Britain don't see a problem
Met sets out policing operation ahead of protests and other events
“Our first priority is to keep the peace to ensure that those exercising their right to lawful protest can do so safely.news.met.police.uk
Three marches in London yesterday and a total of only 9 arrests.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?