why its not his fault
Reason is Haven't ACL already made public they'll allow us to play at Ricoh rest of the season?
as admin he has to check wot that means
as admin he has to check wot that means
Huh? ACL stated Saturday that we can play at Ricoh so whys it took the admin bloke till Tuesday to make contact. Bit late considering he's been in place since last week
Reason is Haven't ACL already made public they'll allow us to play at Ricoh rest of the season?
would like to hear what ACL think is more important than making sure the game goes ahead. If it's true that they were asked for a meeting at 9am and turned it down then that isn't good from their side unless they have a very good reason.
weve bin in court until now sortin out wots in admin and whos in charge of the admin process
you would have hoped sorting arrangements for Friday game would have been mentioned before yesterday? Or is that just silly on my thinking?
as admin he has to check wot that means
The crux of the matter (or should I say horcrux) regarding the negotiations for the next 3 games is which company any short term deal is agreed with.
If ACL agree to let CCFC(holdings) Ltd play then they shoot themselves and any prospective new owners in the foot.
They have to conclude a deal with CCFC Ltd only and CCFC(holdings) Ltd can fund it and charge CCFC Ltd, but that will be an internal matter for them & nothing to do with ACL. Any other course might invalidate their rental lease in some way.
For the next 3 matches I expect the terms to be offered will be cost only, ACL to make no profit, they just make sure the club completes the season so no blame for failing to do that attaches to them.
The responsibility for fulfilling the fixture is CCFC's not ACL or the administrator
ACL havent said wont meet, only that 9am was not convenient, - the directors will have other meetings to attend to relating to other companies/bodies etc and some live some distance away. Not unreasonable on ACL's part at all. The Club were told last Friday the ground was available. The club also said they were making arrangements to play elsewhere, so you have to ask who left it to the last minute :thinking about:
As for the CT saying the administrator was critical of ACL ......... well in the real world not everyone jumps when someone clicks there fingers...... It wasnt ACL that walked out of the ground or repeatedly threatened to.
I suggest we accept that talks are going to happen today...... thats the important thing isnt it?
ACL have been a bit slow off the mark here if you ask me. It's all very well saying the club are welcome to play at the Ricoh, but that doesn't men it just happens. Who will pay the costs? The administrator through CCFC Ltd can't because they have no money, not only that they have no access to ticket revenues or any other revenue for that matter. All along a deal was required between SISU and ACL, so the fact it has been left to Wednesday afternoon (knowing the history between the two parties) is a bit surprising. Hopefully common sense will prevail and an agreement can be cobbled together this afternoon.
I agree with you on the latter point to an extent with regards logistics. That stated, it's okay people getting vexed on other threads with regards ACL not being able to meet with the administrator until this afternoon, as opposed to the requested 9am; but they are acting in the slipstream of very current and extreme events, and will be seeking advice so as not to prejudice their position ahead of offering a temporary home to the club for the balance of the season
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?