I can't remember saying who owned them?
It's useless having a discussion if you can't read what's said.
Sky would lose a fortune also.
Have you got a filter on your TV that gets rid of the heavy sky bet advertising when you watch sky then?Seriously? You're saying you weren't insinuating they are owned by Sky? Then why would you write "there's the issue of telling Sky they can't advertise Sky Bet"? Why would Sky care, when the sponsorship deal sky bet have is with the football league?
Shall we wind in the attempted gas lighting.
Have you got a filter on your TV that gets rid of the heavy sky bet advertising when you watch sky then?
I didn't say anything about ownership, just the advertising all over sky and telling them they won't get that any more.
Have you got a filter on your TV that gets rid of the heavy sky bet advertising when you watch sky then?
I didn't say anything about ownership, just the advertising all over sky and telling them they won't get that any more.
Well no hence I used the word others.???
What are you saying - that Sky Bet are the only company to exist who could possibly have a sponsorship deal with the football league, or purchase advertising space on Sky?
Well no hence I used the word others.
Sky would lose millions / billions if they had to limit advertising when football is on.
I'm not on about sky commentators saying the league name. I mentioned that being on shirts and at club level.
Why get it removed from club shirts to leave it non stop shouting at you with real time odds before, during and after games?Who said anything about limiting advertising when football is on?
Why get it removed from club shirts to leave it non stop shouting at you with real time odds before, during and after games?
Read what has been typed. Once you grasp this you can talk about what a discussion is.
Why get it removed from club shirts to leave it non stop shouting at you with real time odds before, during and after games?
Read what has been typed. Once you grasp this you can talk about what a discussion is.
Why do you think advertising only comes in the form of gambling companies?
Don't worry, I have no problem in reading everything that's been typed, I just find it difficult to interpret nonsense.
Where have I said it ONLY comes in the form of gambling companies?
Try reading and understanding before replying.
You have said Sky would "lose millions/billions" if advertising was limited when football was on. But why would it be limited? They can air as much advertisement as they want, even if gambling companies can't advertise. The only way it would affect them is if they couldn't find businesses to advertise whilst the football was on, but why would this be the case? They already have a lucrative deal with screwfix who are not a gambling company. And there's only so much advertising space anyway, so they would just need to replace the gambling companies with other advertisers. The things you are saying don't make any sense.
Because the gambling companies are paying much more when it comes to the football market. Yes, I am sure there will be other advertisers but are they going to pay as much?
I said if "gambling advertisement" was limited. I have never said when football is on it's exclusive to betting companies.
Sky would lose millions / billions if they had to LIMIT ADVERTISING when football is on.
I don't know if they will pay as much, I don't work in the world of TV advertising, and I am pretty confident that you don't know either.
More gaslighting.
But if you watch football on TV you have betting ads before the game and then both teams wearing betting companies on their shirts with betting advertising going around the outside of the pitch.
I can't imagine how difficult that is for people that struggle with gambling addictions and it needs to be legislated.
Advertising in general, yep I know they do.
It isn't gaslighting, You try to patronise about what a discussion is but struggle to follow a basic one.
How do you know?
Well, you state that you said "if gambling advertisement was limited", yet if you scroll back to comment #40 it can clearly be seen that you said "if they had to limit advertising when football was on". Literally the definition of gaslighting.
The government have blood on their hands, with the way they allowed gambling sites to absolutely bombard the TV during the first lockdown, gambling debt related suicide skyrocketed. even through the day you couldn’t watch anything without seeing, a spins and two bingo advertisements. Late night TV is still has bad now, The government are allowing these vultures to pray on peoples boredom.
How do you know?
Well, you state that you said "if gambling advertisement was limited", yet if you scroll back to comment #40 it can clearly be seen that you said "if they had to limit advertising when football was on". Literally the definition of gaslighting.
Look at the profit gambling companies make, there is only one winner. And it ain’t the punter.
the revenue is around £200 million a year on sky sports channels it’s the biggest market at peak sports times
I like a flutter, I put an acca on every Saturday and have a dabble in the Casino before home games. Luckily I can moderate my gambling, but fully understand other can't, being bombarded with Gambling adverts and promises of 'boosted odds' and 'free bets' can surely only act as a trigger for those in that boat.
A blanket ban on gambling advertisements would be a great step forward
However I fully understand why CCFC were quick to jump into bed with Boylesports, there can't be companies in many other industries who were offering the money they were to be on the shirts, I'd imagine CCFC had to dance with the devil to help to be competitive at Championship level
In a thread about gambling, I didn't realise I had to break it down and speak slowly like I was speaking to a child.
How do I know that betting companies pay more for advertising in the football markets?
Big money. Is that exclusively from the gambling companies, or the entire advertising revenue? I know the majority of the advertisers are gambling companies mind.
nor me but tbh makes the shirt look shit.Anyways having said that, seeing BoyleSports on our shirt hasnt made me get a Boylesports account. If anything they've stopped doing stuff for us when in the first season they would send Cov fans £10.00 free bets and stuff (I think)
I get they’d have offered more money, and the club needs all it can get. Doesn’t change that it was disappointing to see though.
You're saying you stated it in a different thread, which is completely separate from the discussion occurring in this thread? Is it fair to expect people to trawl through thousands of your posts before replying to you?
It's nice to see you've resorted to insults, that's the mark of someone who's articulately won an argument.
Gambling companies - at big events advertisers bid for the main spots - the big gambling companies pay far more to dominate the slots
I'd happily have Boylesports off the shirts tomorrow if it wouldn't cost us a shed load of money (I couldn't even guess the figure in which they trumped Allsop and Allsop to be on the shirts)
1) For obvious reasons
2) I think the 'This is betting' strap-line on all our shirts looks unbelievably tacky - A massive damper on some beautiful shirts made by Hummel last season and this season
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?