Look on twitter and the CT site. Things like this announcement today are celebrated as SISU getting their due except, even if the football club ceased to exist, it would have at best minimal impact.
It could be because he has a vested interest in the lease and an emotional interest in the future of Cov Rugby.
Having seen the predicament of CCFC under SISU's tenure, he may well be right not to want anything to do with SISU.
You keep thinking that !
The reason Coventry United was set up.What safety net is that then?
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Problem is, it is quite reasonable to say no further negotiations whilst the legal stuff is going on.
The next potential legal action affects Wasps.
They were in negotiations over a potential 20 year commitment. With a business that is on the verge of dragging them into legal action.
That 20 year commitment is a nice to have for them. Whereas it's a potential life line for us.
They would be pretty stupid not to use it to exert pressure over the legal action. (They don't seem stupid to me)
Also it seems CCC are a key business associate for them.
So at the same time as protecting their own interests they also butter up a key business associate.
Do you know the terms of the 20 year stuff? Would really need to know more info before saying it is a life line for us.
I just wonder what any spat between CCFC and SISU has to do with someone who lives in America?
Not having a go at you rupert but Cov United aren't a ccfc Phoenix club and cannot replace ccfc if we get liquidated. It is no safety net.The reason Coventry United was set up.
Not having a go at you rupert but Cov United aren't a ccfc Phoenix club and cannot replace ccfc if we get liquidated. It is no safety net.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Problem is, it is quite reasonable to say no further negotiations whilst the legal stuff is going on.
The next potential legal action affects Wasps.
They were in negotiations over a potential 20 year commitment. With a business that is on the verge of dragging them into legal action.
That 20 year commitment is a nice to have for them. Whereas it's a potential life line for us.
They would be pretty stupid not to use it to exert pressure over the legal action. (They don't seem stupid to me)
Also it seems CCC are a key business associate for them.
So at the same time as protecting their own interests they also butter up a key business associate.
Forgive me, but in what way does the legal action affect Wasps? The stadium is fully owned by them, the loans are cleared, I can see no way in which the legal action can impact Wasps.
It could potentially hurt the council in terms of damages, but there's no scenario I can see where the deal can now be be unwound - so again, how does it affect Wasps?
They are named in JR2. Which means they will beed to supply information. Probably give evidence.
They will need to use lawyers to look over everything. To ensure they are safeguarded.
Unnecessary hassle brought to them by the people they were looking to sign a 20 year business relationship with.
You have no idea any of what you have just said is true do you?
It will never be a ccfc Phoenix regardless of whether some people will start supporting them or not, unlike AFC Wimbledon which did rise from the ashes of the old Wimbledon FC.Not that I believe we would ever be liquidated. However for some it would be if that ever happens. Others of course it wouldn't.
No, you are right.
If Wasps are a named party in a judicial review.
They will just ignore it. They won't seek legal advice about it.
Nobody will ask them for information and they won't have to give any evidence.
In fact why are they even named?
It will never be a ccfc Phoenix regardless of whether some people will start supporting them or not, unlike AFC Wimbledon which did rise from the ashes of the old Wimbledon FC.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Ah you mean technically a Phoenix club. As oppose to saying no one will start supporting them.
They are a party of interest as a technicality. So you don't know anything about 20 year deals do you? Or about the legal action being an obstacle - do you ?
Why would anyone support them?
I know they were in negotions around a 20 year deal.
I know Wasps state they pulled the plug on the negotiations due to the "background noise" around the legal action.
I know Wasps will seek legal advice as they are named in JR2.
So what do you know that proves any of the above is not correct?
Some will if CCFC are liquidated (which I do not believe they will be)
You know they were looking at a 20 year deal do you? Really? "Background noise" means you don't know anything of the sort. You know that's the PR statement.
I'm interested of you do know about the 20 year deal because if you do you will know the "legal noise" statement was bollocks will you not?
The legal noise statement is not true.
Please explain how you know this?
I get the impression you are lying and don't know that at all, however Let's hear it how do you know it's not true?
They made a statement about "legal noise" - that's an odd thing to say and as they have often, let's be polite, contradicted themselves many times this is no evidence at all?
You also stated as fact they want to do a 20 year deal - you made the statement.
backing up my comments.......
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/we-felt-difficult-conclude-long-11419646
Now please back up your comments that what is in the link is not true?
Without any proof from you. I am happy to conclude as normal that you are full of it.
That's just quoting what Armstrong said. How is that evidence?
Your not being serious are you - is that it?
So you know it's not true? Could you please provide the relevant link? By the way I would support a Phoenix club should we be liquidated as would others. Now that is a factThat's just quoting what Armstrong said. How is that evidence?
Your not being serious are you - is that it?
This debate won't bring us further.
So quotes from the man who was in the meeting.
Who has then stated this in the press.
Against you suggesting I am speaking bollox and know nothing.
That it isn't true and all of this by you is based on nothing.
Excellent well I am glad we got that sorted you have completely convinced me Armstrong is a liar and you know more than him. Well done
In the same meeting when asked about the legal situation being a barrier Anderson said "no" - when wasps were asked before they came here they said they'd never leave the south west.
What next - fisher said we were building a stadium so we are?
For a minute I thought you were being serious.
Most would,including me, but Coventry united aren't a phoenix club.So you know it's not true? Could you please provide the relevant link? By the way I would support a Phoenix club should we be liquidated as would others. Now that is a fact
Comedy
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?