Ccfc_Addy
Well-Known Member
FWIW I completely agree and that's how I read the statement too. Like I said; always with a pinch of salt
FWIW I completely agree and that's how I read the statement too. Like I said; always with a pinch of saltI get what you're saying, but the statement when Robins was sacked was the new manager would work with the existing coaching structure at the club.
Just seems a little strange to fuck everyone off after spending all that time and money on appointing them.
That doesn’t mean it’d be the same people here now though, it’s more to do with the actual structure in place.I get what you're saying, but the statement when Robins was sacked was the new manager would work with the existing coaching structure at the club.
Just seems a little strange to fuck everyone off after spending all that time and money on appointing them.
Maybe robins liked the coaches???? People keep assuming he wasnt happy with the set up but we don't know that.Absolutely no way this happens surely. If we’re open to binning off the coaches for a new manager, why didn’t we do just that and keep robins?
For Chelsea though where he was a club legend. It was the wrong move but kind of impossible to turn down.I'm not convinced, but yes.
Also not sure about him leaving Derby at the first opportunity.
People have been giving the coaches a lot of stick and they have not been that visible until yesterday - I though RC came across really well pre and post match - again makes you wonder a few thingsI get what you're saying, but the statement when Robins was sacked was the new manager would work with the existing coaching structure at the club.
Just seems a little strange to fuck everyone off after spending all that time and money on appointing them.
Why not the players will be it's international break and everyone gets annual leaveSomeone has just told me that the performance director is on holiday, this surely cannot be true.
International break ?Someone has just told me that the performance director is on holiday, this surely cannot be true.
For Chelsea though where he was a club legend. It was the wrong move but kind of impossible to turn down.
It would be like of any us being offered the Coventry Job after a good year at Nuneaton boro
Probably pre-booked leave during the international break?Someone has just told me that the performance director is on holiday, this surely cannot be true.
Maybe robins liked the coaches???? People keep assuming he wasnt happy with the set up but we don't know that.
Good point, that could be the case. But as a I said above, it's a massive waste of resources to recruit staff and fuck them off a few months later.That doesn’t mean it’d be the same people here now though, it’s more to do with the actual structure in place.
Don’t think we have to worry for the three years though after his last two moves, think he’ll want to stay and get some time in a role. But that’s a risk with any manager and think if Manchester United came in for Mark it would of been the sameBut that's a worry for me. If he manages a good season will he run off to the first big club that comes knocking. Long term stability is good for us.
This makes it sound like Robins was making the decisions - Mark Robins has announced two new Coventry City coaches
I get what you're saying, but the statement when Robins was sacked was the new manager would work with the existing coaching structure at the club.
Just seems a little strange to fuck everyone off after spending all that time and money on appointing them.
To be fair two of the four were previously in the U21s maybe Doug and the club are hoping to move them back to there old roles.Not saying he didn't. I just don't understand why, even if they were all Robins choices it'd be the case of "you've done wonders for the past 7.5 years, but these new coaches are wank so fuck off" and then completely start again.
For a businessman like Doug that seems a massive waste of resources and money, which is why I was expecting the current coaches to stay.
Good point, that could be the case. But as a I said above, it's a massive waste of resources to recruit staff and fuck them off a few months later.
ThisStructure and personnel are two different things entirely.
Funny as I remember the Chris Ramsey rumor that he was going to replace one as they were moving back.And Robins has just been sacked for poor results.
So if he introduced it, and he and it failed, why are we insisting the new man keeps it?
It makes no sense?
Not that we will keep it anyway because Morris will take up a position that currently doesn't exist. It's all bullshit.
No he was told what to say by KingThis makes it sound like Robins was making the decisions - Mark Robins has announced two new Coventry City coaches
Funny as I remember the Chris Ramsey rumor that he was going to replace one as they were moving back.
Maybe that’s the plan now for Morris
No he was told what to say by King
Makes more sense to me that it was now Robins has been sacked. Why would you recruit Chris only to sack the manager who wants him. Think Doug’s been thinking about this for a while and needed a trigger after out form turnedBut that move was kibosh by King apparently.
Whatever the reason Ramsey didn't come Morris will tajevup a position that doesn't currently exist
The structure or the personal?So if its on Robins and its failed why are the club insisting we keep it? Why won't people answer this?
Makes more sense to me that it was now Robins has been sacked. Why would you recruit Chris only to sack the manager who wants him. Think Doug’s been thinking about this for a while and needed a trigger after out form turned
The structure or the personal?
I imagine the structure was a club decision and he was the one responsible for bringing in staff to work with.And Robins has just been sacked for poor results.
So if he introduced it, and he and it failed, why are we insisting the new man keeps it?
It makes no sense?
Not that we will keep it anyway because Morris will take up a position that currently doesn't exist. It's all bullshit.
I imagine the structure was a club decision and he was the one responsible for bringing in staff to work with.
Two parts I guess:The structure.
If Robins put it in, why are we keeping it?
If he didn't, why did we force the manager to move away from a structure that had brought him success even if it was him that chose the personnel?
Pretty much.So King, who admits to knowing nothing about football, decided to rip up what brought us success and threw Robins under the bus when it didn't work?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?