Sexist
SexistWhere does this leave the performance director?
Assume she'll still be required, but hss she improved us in any way?
Loans aren't necessarily cheap as often the parent club demands a loan fee - which can be substantial - as well as requiring that some or all of the player's wages are covered.
Did you listen to King at the conference?Where does this leave the performance director?
Assume she'll still be required, but hss she improved us in any way?
Probably not but he will be on a much bigger wage than any of our current coachesNo he won't be, he was sacked in his first actual managers job.
He won't be on manager wages as a coach
Just to further add, if you are struggling with her role, its basically head of sports scienceDid you listen to King at the conference?
Her remit is not related to the on-pitch performance. It’s all about the team’s strength and conditioning, nutrition, sleep hygiene and so on. Apparently the team is as ‘fit’ as it’s ever been and performing higher on these metrics than before she came in.
We’ve scored 10 goals in the 76-90m which is the joint highest in the EFL so there’s clearly an impact on real match performance.
Will he? Doubtful but if you have proof please feel free to share this.Probably not but he will be on a much bigger wage than any of our current coaches
Worst case in the Lampard era is we have to sack him and the staff and pay out another fortune.Robins had a lot of control and imo, the manager needs to have as much ‘power’ as possible in terms of recruitment (i.e. sign-off) and coaching structure. This logic applied to Robins as much as his successor.
Give Lampard everything he needs to have success in the role and then there’s no excuse if he fails. He’s going to be a lot better connected than MR ever was so the optimism I have is that he’ll be able to bring in high quality coaches with him.
It may be harsh on the existing coaching setup but even by Robins own admission, he chose them and they were ‘growing in the role’. The best case view of this is that they are ‘developing’ into the level required. The worst case, is that they’re out of their depth and that leap of faith from MR probably cost him his job.
You're very belligerent, obviously I don't have proof.Will he? Doubtful but if you have proof please feel free to share this.
The consensus seems to be that this is Lampard's last chance to manage in the top 2 divisions.
If that is the case, you'd have to assume then that King has made some significant promises around transfer budgets
It's the cost of the staff and Lampard that worries me with his track record.King can’t win can he, if he brings someone in and allows them to hire their own preferred staff it’s risky but if he brought in a head coach and makes them work with what we’ve got he’d be “cheap”.
I really don’t understand why people are getting hung up on the ‘Performance’ part of her job title.Just to further add, if you are struggling with her role, its basically head of sports science
By that definition, any manager is a risk. Even hiring a manager who wanted to bring in no staff even though King thought there was a lack of elite coaches in the setup.Worst case in the Lampard era is we have to sack him and the staff and pay out another fortune.
There is no guarantee he delivers more than Robins would have with the same resources.
It's a big risk and perhaps it works out. I thought we were being run sustainably and sensibly but this decision seems at odds with that perception.
Let's see what he does with players transfers but it could become a complete change in approach from king.By that definition, any manager is a risk. Even hiring a manager who wanted to bring in no staff even though King thought there was a lack of elite coaches in the setup.
I really don’t understand why people are getting hung up on the ‘Performance’ part of her job title.
People are just frustrated at things and wanted to point fingers at anyone but Robins. In no particular order, it was AV being pushed out, the flat coaching setup, then Dr Roberts and DK undermining MR.
Then DK said MR ended it with AV and decided on the unpopular coaching setup up… it was King throwing Robins under bus. The record needed to be set straight because of the poisonous narratives being put out.
It never made sense.
You said he would be on similar wages to Robins fella, no one mentioned John Dempster.You're very belligerent, obviously I don't have proof.
Logic suggests the former England youth, Chelsea, Everton assistant and Millwall manager is being paid a lot more than the likes of John Dempster.
We spent close to £45m under Robins. We’re already in the boom and bust cycle!Let's see what he does with players transfers but it could become a complete change in approach from king.
That would be a big risk and aligns is to the rest of the championship promotion chasers. Boom and bust.
Lampard will be doing everything to make this a success. It's a good thing for us.
He will have aspirations for that England job post-Tuchel.
Hopefully out the door, things have been terrible since she’s come inWhere does this leave the performance director?
Assume she'll still be required, but hss she improved us in any way?
Don’t think for a second Doug changes model. Way too headstrong for thatWe spent close to £45m under Robins. We’re already in the boom and bust cycle!
she has fuck all to do with the team on the pitch, as i said to wingy this was clarified at the forumHopefully out the door, things have been terrible since she’s come in
She can take Austin with her too
or maybe he has looked around and studied new tactics etc.That assumes his problem so far has been a lack of application whereas the consensus seems to be that what he has demonstrated in his coaching career to date is a lack of ability. Maybe he has worked on that and made significant strides and is ready to prove himself, but trying harder doesn’t make you a world beater. If it did Andy Morrell would’ve got 100 England caps.
Our form is all her fault when she has nothing to do with the football side of things ?Hopefully out the door, things have been terrible since she’s come in
She can take Austin with her too
She’s head of sport science bud,Hopefully out the door, things have been terrible since she’s come in
She can take Austin with her too
That's the most annoying thing. He works the ball up the pitch very well to just outside the opposition's box, only to then pretty much always fail to deliver any meaningful cross into the box.Bidwell is fine. There is another myth that needs debunking which says JDS is more progressive. I can't think of a single goal he's created. I could be wrong, but can't recall one.
Apparently we now have Premier levels of fitness, as is obvious watching the team.Where does this leave the performance director?
Assume she'll still be required, but hss she improved us in any way?
Which is weird when you consider he’s got a decent delivery at corners if I’m not wrongThat's the most annoying thing. He works the ball up very well to just outside the opposition's box, only to then pretty much always fail to deliver any meaningful cross into the box.
What we had was a relegation zone team, demoralised, players out of position, poor basics skills, unclear first 11, unclear formation and a manager who looked lost as to what to do.It's the cost of the staff and Lampard that worries me with his track record.
There's nothing to suggest he's going to improve what we had so why bother gambling.
How is that sexist?Sexist
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?