If it's all down to the players wanting it or not there should be no issue with sacking the manager? He's irrelevant?They pick and choose their performances and largely turn it on in games where either nothing is at stake or nothing is expected from them. They argue with each other on the pitch more often than I can remember from any City team.
Case in point they win 2 games, think they’re shit hot and then turn in that crap on Wednesday. Weak.
Wouldn't mind Edwards...Rob Edwards probably available after today too
Good old fashioned manager swap?
Edwards did a great tjob but not the style of football I wanna seeMark Robins would need 4 transfer windows at Luton to change that team over to actual footballers. Couldn’t see him doing well there unless they are patient. I think their fans would be over the moon with that appointment though.
Edwards did a great tjob but not the style of football I wanna see
But that might have been a needs must situation I dunno
If these points are correct then what benefit comes from sacking MR now?1) can be rectified in 1 window
2) no proof this is true
3) don't be part of the problem
That’s what they’ve done with this manager. Perhaps a different personality can get more consistency from them, perhaps not. You must admit it is very telling especially from the summer onwards.If it's all down to the players wanting it or not there should be no issue with sacking the manager? He's irrelevant?
I don't disagree. I never hated aidy boothroydI know I make fun, but I think Luton can occasionally be an entertaining watch. Getting the ball forward quickly to big athletic players can be exciting, and up until this season they were defensively pretty good in the Champ I think? I don’t really know how long he’s been in charge there though?
In all of the fixtures i mentioned there was lots at stake. In most they had to comeback from adversity.They pick and choose their performances and largely turn it on in games where either nothing is at stake or nothing is expected from them. They argue with each other on the pitch more often than I can remember from any City team.
Case in point they win 2 games, think they’re shit hot and then turn in that crap on Wednesday. Weak.
But then you should understand why robins has gone if you feel new manager can shake it up?If these points are correct then what benefit comes from sacking MR now?
That’s what they’ve done with this manager. Perhaps a different personality can get more consistency from them, perhaps not. You must admit it is very telling especially from the summer onwards.
Free flowing performances in the summer friendlies, then mostly very poor football thereafter with our best coming against Spurs in a game that didn’t matter. I cannot remember seeing our players argue or have a go at their teammates as often as these do either.
I don't disagree. I never heard aidy boothroyd
But at this moment in time I want high pressure ball on the floor and fluid movement
Just me personally
Where you heard thisApparently signed a 3 year deal announcement Monday.
Come in Ashley, get the chopper out
Could be bullshitWhere you heard this
FA Cup games against top flight clubs, nothing is expected and it’s a free hit. Warne didn’t out think anyone. Jack Rudoni goes insane to gift a lead within 10 minutes, we miss a bunch of chances and they score a deflection.In all of the fixtures i mentioned there was lots at stake. In most they had to comeback from adversity.
It wasn’t the players fault Mark was out thought by Warne on Wednesday and took 65 mins to change anything.
Not much longer, imo; 2-0 down today and their fans are after him big style.I know I make fun, but I think Luton can occasionally be an entertaining watch. Getting the ball forward quickly to big athletic players can be exciting, and up until this season they were defensively pretty good in the Champ I think? I don’t really know how long he’s been in charge there though?
Be nice if at the fans forum with kingCould be bullshit
Imagine if he leaves Luton and comes here, and then Robins takes his job?Not much longer, imo; 2-0 down today and their fans are after him big style.
But we're not underdogs now, there is expectationLook I can understand why some fans like the idea of Lampard. It’s been a long time as a club since we have been linked to big footballing “names” such as his. I just don’t think he fits with our DNA as a club whatsoever.
we’ve got where we have being underdogs, building something where we aren’t the flashiest name, but with a good group who knows there identity. I don’t want to be all over sky coverage as “Frank Lampards Coventry City”
My view was he should have been given more time-not the whole season, more until Christmas when if we’re still in trouble there’s little argument change would be needed.But then you should understand why robins has gone if you feel new manager can shake it up?
What exactly is our DNA as a club?Look I can understand why some fans like the idea of Lampard. It’s been a long time as a club since we have been linked to big footballing “names” such as his. I just don’t think he fits with our DNA as a club whatsoever.
we’ve got where we have being underdogs, building something where we aren’t the flashiest name, but with a good group who knows there identity. I don’t want to be all over sky coverage as “Frank Lampards Coventry City”
FUCKING NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO + O for OtisI counted them all up and think you missed one O out there.
I agree I would have given him more time to sort itMy view was he should have been given more time-not the whole season, more until Christmas when if we’re still in trouble there’s little argument change would be needed.
During games you see often how not having any leaders out there hurts us in a range of situations, winning or losing.
Was your Lampard post yesterday actually something you’d heard?But we're not underdogs now, there is expectation
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Lampard will also be much financially better off because of his playing career.
I'm just pointing out that saying "he's bad" because of not being in a job is a bit too simplistic.
Completely different, one was a club legend and another is someone that not many people rate and not many want before he's even been appointed. He won't get much time from the fan base if things start not going well.Most supporters weren't demanding a change (in manager) this time
Not sure it could get much worse to be to honest.I do think Lampard could have us playing some decent attacking football.
The worry is that his teams have always been defensively awful and given our defensive frailties this season that is a scary prospect.
Is your source is from a random on facebook .....Apparently signed a 3 year deal announcement Monday.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?