Sorry but how are we to make sense of that. Looks like the matrix
Great. Glad we are!
All about consistency from now on in though.
The only bit you need is the team name,
First stat in the row is last number of games played.
Last stat in the row if the average points gained over that time.
All you really need to know is that over the last 11 games since that shit spell after we sacked our manager. We have been the 3rd best team in the league at picking up points.
Now lost 6 in a row.
Let's hope they don't have a new manager by Saturday.
Thanks for letting me know that, 2nd time recently ive saw something similar and i was lost
Portsmouth r in bottom 4 to top it off. Was amazed at Their start to this season sitting above us around 10 games in.
Now lost 6 in a row.
Let's hope they don't have a new manager by Saturday.
Now lost 6 in a row.
That was probably more down to our start than theirs! Oh, for the season to have started after those first 8 games!
Controversial one from me, with the danger of starting a whole debate that has been done to death.
A draw away at Yeovil was respectable. A draw at home to Sheff Utd was a good result.
The following 6 results, a draw with Bury and 5 defeats were the shit results for me.
I don't think tranmere will sack Ronnie More after their shit draw with Walsall tonight.
P.s Sorry but it does frustrate me.
Hard to say they have improved when you are comparing them to three matches.
I didn't feel I could genuinely judge AT last season due to the owner's actions.
This season I felt I would finally be able to and we only got three matches.
However that is nothing to with MR who is doing a very good job.
I was fairly apathetic toward AT; partly because he did his best during a terribly unsettling period and I couldn't bring myself to dislike him, and partly because I think managerially he was on a par with some of the other dross appointed over the past twelve years, however (and it's a big however for me) since Robins arrival I do think that his departure was the right thing for the club, and came six months too late. and the good form we're currently showing is with, what, two of his summer signings?
Ridiculous.
Robbins has shown what a proper manager brings to the club.
He is working hard to correct all the wrongs his predecessor did.
To even hint that if Thorn was still in charge we would be better off is totally disresepctful of what Robins is doing.
Ask this where would we be if he had been appointed in May -- we would be in th top 6. With his lazy excuse ridden predecessor we would still be near the bottom and people like you would still be defending him.
And some of Robins new guys are making an impact - Moussa, Bailey and the new left back all played the last 2 games and sound like they did well.
Most of the summer signings will hardly figure all season.
I was fairly apathetic toward AT; partly because he did his best during a terribly unsettling period and I couldn't bring myself to dislike him, and partly because I think managerially he was on a par with some of the other dross appointed over the past twelve years, however (and it's a big however for me) since Robins arrival I do think that his departure was the right thing for the club, and came six months too late. and the good form we're currently showing is with, what, two of his summer signings?
I said it is impossible to compare, because you are comparing over three matches.
You can't say he wouldnt have achieved the same as much as I can't say he would.
We will never know.
What I am saying is those who say thank god Robins is turning this around.
To me he is turning round the shit state the club was in as a result of sacking the bloke who signed 10 players, after 3 games.
That was a big task and he is doing it admirably.
However I cant really say he has improved compared to what AT dud as that was three games. Not long enough to compare in my book.
So you don't think Robins has any better qualities than Thorn?
You don't think his strategy is better - don't you think the team look fitter and more organised. Aren't you more confident we can hold onto a lead with a team managed by Robins that Thorn.
Get off the fence -- who is the manager who makes you more confident of a better future.
I think it's fair to say that Robins is the more professional of the two, both in the way he speaks and acts. I've changed my view, and it was painful accepting I was wrong to sit on the fence about AT, but he wasn't a great manager. Would we have stayed up with someone else? I say it was unlikely (Grendal will disagree on that, but it's his right to have a differing opinion) but I do believe that AT wasn't the right man to take us up. He wasn't inspirational, motivational or tactically astute. The evidence is there, in his post-match interviews and in the games themselves. Robins has a touch of the old-school, no-nonsence about him, and the players have responded in a way that I highly doubt they would have done under AT.
You don't seem to get the its impossible to compare bit.
You can't compare a bloke who had three games with these lot with one who has now had 11.
Yes you very much can - you can compare attitude, motivation, body language and energy. If we had sacked him in May we would be in a better place. Robins is having to turn around 2 years of gross mis-management and he needs plaudits for that.
If we follow your argument then we should also say we cannot judge Shaw as he had only 4 games and we can.
So yes I agree we would have been better off if they sacked him in May.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?