Fisher. Ownership .the five point plan. (1 Viewer)

[wingy]

Would the recently published five point plan seeking local Investment have a more receptive ,beneficial outcome handled and led by a

successful local business person/entrepreneur acting as Chairman ?

Would this replacement enable the Club to increase It's fan base substantially ,meaning at least 2-3 k per match across a season ,

Primarily due to Fishers toxicity ?

Would this replacement be able to progress the Alleged new Stadium ?

Given the potential benefits on the first two points ,Is the third point negated to a degree ?

I'm hoping Nick or Someone will convert these questions into an anonymous Poll.

 

---

[Nick]

Doesn't look like it is going to let me turn it into a poll once it's been made.

Although it would really depend on who the local businessman was before I judged...If not it would go into the bullshit drawer the same as Fisher's did.

I am guessing the way people are going on about local businessmen and consortiums and the protest to get sisu out because people are known to be waiting to take over CCFC there are some rumours flying.

If it was a decent businessman though I thought was going to do the best for the club then I would of course back it. If it was Joe Elliott he can get to fuck as well, although I am sure I will get abuse for saying that.

 

[wingy]

Doesn't look like it is going to let me turn it into a poll once it's been made.

Although it would really depend on who the local businessman was before I judged...If not it would go into the bullshit drawer the same as Fisher's did.

I am guessing the way people are going on about local businessmen and consortiums and the protest to get sisu out because people are known to be waiting to take over CCFC there are some rumours flying.

If it was a decent businessman though I thought was going to do the best for the club then I would of course back it. If it was Joe Elliott he can get to fuck as well, although I am sure I will get abuse for saying that.

I think you're wrong here mate ,I'm asking a genuine question .

Have heard nothing of what you are alluding to

 

[Nick]

I do think if the same stuff came out of somebody elses mouth but same words it would be taken a lot better. It would depend who it was though.

Sorry, wasn't trying to get away from the point

 

[wingy]

If you notice my questions are not asking SISU to go Nor for anyone connected to the club previously as I say successful .:facepalm:

 

[Nick]

You have to think though, look at how garlick is treated.. They would probably just be accused of all sorts..

I think if things come from a fellow city fan they would always sound better wouldn't they?

 

[wingy]

I do think if the same stuff came out of somebody elses mouth but same words it would be taken a lot better. It would depend who it was though.

Sorry, wasn't trying to get away from the point

So take my word for It and don't assume I'm coming with someone elses agenda .

Then Answer the 4 points one by one yes or no. Simple

 

[wingy]

You have to think though, look at how garlick is treated.. They would probably just be accused of all sorts..

I think if things come from a fellow city fan they would always sound better wouldn't they?

Yes ,but she and others are tainted by association .

Fisher like It or not Is tainted .

Get someone new In clean slate and every one has become entangled in this hiatus gets a clean slate .

It has to be someone fresh though .

 

[Nick]

I think probably yes to all but the other thing is how it would be taken by the most vocal people. The telegraph etc and how they would want to spin it.

They could be the best in the world but people don't understand how many People like to just follow the "majority"'.

I think sisu.could do much worse than getting somebody decent, local with a love for city in as their mouth piece. If it is still sisu behind it, I do think it wouldn't take long for the sisu puppet stuff due to the blind hatred.

 

[wingy]

I think probably yes to all but the other thing is how it would be taken by the most vocal people. The telegraph etc and how they would want to spin it.

They could be the best in the world but people don't understand how many People like to just follow the "majority"'.

I think sisu.could do much worse than getting somebody decent, local with a love for city in as their mouth piece. If it is still sisu behind it, I do think it wouldn't take long for the sisu puppet stuff due to the blind hatred.

But I'm possibly of that Ilk and suggesting It as I see a benefit In It.

 

[Nick]

But I'm possibly of that Ilk and suggesting It as I see a benefit In It.

I can see the sense in it, I can see it as a better link between the fans, the club and sisu but I think if sisu are still there some would just let that hatred ruin it maybe? Look at sandra garlick as an example, I don't know much her business but I assume she has built a good business and is an intelligent person. She gets slaughtered.

 

[Terry Gibson's perm]

Anything that removes Fisher and Waggott can only be a good thing unless they are replaced by Elliot.

 

[Nick]

Exactly, If the club is going down a new stadium route then a fresh start is needed and hopefully better pr (it should be with that company)

 

[wingy]

OOH IT don't work .

Not a bad try for a technophobe but although It appears to let you vote on all four categories it only registers on one .