Fisher. Ownership .the five point plan. (1 Viewer)

wingy · Jan 6, 2015

Would the recently published five point plan seeking local Investment have a more receptive ,beneficial outcome handled and led by a

successful local business person/entrepreneur acting as Chairman ?

Would this replacement enable the Club to increase It's fan base substantially ,meaning at least 2-3 k per match across a season ,

Primarily due to Fishers toxicity ?

Would this replacement be able to progress the Alleged new Stadium ?

Given the potential benefits on the first two points ,Is the third point negated to a degree ?

I'm hoping Nick or Someone will convert these questions into an anonymous Poll.

Nick · Jan 6, 2015

Doesn't look like it is going to let me turn it into a poll once it's been made.

Although it would really depend on who the local businessman was before I judged...If not it would go into the bullshit drawer the same as Fisher's did.

I am guessing the way people are going on about local businessmen and consortiums and the protest to get sisu out because people are known to be waiting to take over CCFC there are some rumours flying.

If it was a decent businessman though I thought was going to do the best for the club then I would of course back it. If it was Joe Elliott he can get to fuck as well, although I am sure I will get abuse for saying that.

wingy · Jan 6, 2015

Nick said:
Doesn't look like it is going to let me turn it into a poll once it's been made.

Although it would really depend on who the local businessman was before I judged...If not it would go into the bullshit drawer the same as Fisher's did.

I am guessing the way people are going on about local businessmen and consortiums and the protest to get sisu out because people are known to be waiting to take over CCFC there are some rumours flying.

If it was a decent businessman though I thought was going to do the best for the club then I would of course back it. If it was Joe Elliott he can get to fuck as well, although I am sure I will get abuse for saying that.

I think you're wrong here mate ,I'm asking a genuine question .

Have heard nothing of what you are alluding to

Nick · Jan 6, 2015

I do think if the same stuff came out of somebody elses mouth but same words it would be taken a lot better. It would depend who it was though.

Sorry, wasn't trying to get away from the point

wingy · Jan 6, 2015

If you notice my questions are not asking SISU to go Nor for anyone connected to the club previously as I say successful .:facepalm:

Nick · Jan 6, 2015

You have to think though, look at how garlick is treated.. They would probably just be accused of all sorts..

I think if things come from a fellow city fan they would always sound better wouldn't they?

wingy · Jan 6, 2015

Nick said:
I do think if the same stuff came out of somebody elses mouth but same words it would be taken a lot better. It would depend who it was though.

Sorry, wasn't trying to get away from the point

So take my word for It and don't assume I'm coming with someone elses agenda .

Then Answer the 4 points one by one yes or no. Simple

wingy · Jan 6, 2015

Nick said:
You have to think though, look at how garlick is treated.. They would probably just be accused of all sorts..

I think if things come from a fellow city fan they would always sound better wouldn't they?

Yes ,but she and others are tainted by association .

Fisher like It or not Is tainted .

Get someone new In clean slate and every one has become entangled in this hiatus gets a clean slate .

It has to be someone fresh though .

Nick · Jan 6, 2015

I think probably yes to all but the other thing is how it would be taken by the most vocal people. The telegraph etc and how they would want to spin it.

They could be the best in the world but people don't understand how many People like to just follow the "majority"'.

I think sisu.could do much worse than getting somebody decent, local with a love for city in as their mouth piece. If it is still sisu behind it, I do think it wouldn't take long for the sisu puppet stuff due to the blind hatred.

wingy · Jan 6, 2015

Nick said:
I think probably yes to all but the other thing is how it would be taken by the most vocal people. The telegraph etc and how they would want to spin it.

They could be the best in the world but people don't understand how many People like to just follow the "majority"'.

I think sisu.could do much worse than getting somebody decent, local with a love for city in as their mouth piece. If it is still sisu behind it, I do think it wouldn't take long for the sisu puppet stuff due to the blind hatred.

But I'm possibly of that Ilk and suggesting It as I see a benefit In It.

Nick · Jan 6, 2015

wingy said:
But I'm possibly of that Ilk and suggesting It as I see a benefit In It.

I can see the sense in it, I can see it as a better link between the fans, the club and sisu but I think if sisu are still there some would just let that hatred ruin it maybe? Look at sandra garlick as an example, I don't know much her business but I assume she has built a good business and is an intelligent person. She gets slaughtered.

Terry Gibson's perm · Jan 6, 2015

Anything that removes Fisher and Waggott can only be a good thing unless they are replaced by Elliot.

Nick · Jan 6, 2015

Exactly, If the club is going down a new stadium route then a fresh start is needed and hopefully better pr (it should be with that company)

wingy · Jan 6, 2015

OOH IT don't work .

Not a bad try for a technophobe but although It appears to let you vote on all four categories it only registers on one .

Fisher. Ownership .the five point plan. (1 Viewer)

Replacement of TimFisher

Would replacing Fisher lead to a better outcome as outlined in the opening post ?

Would Ticket sales and Sponsorship deals increase sufficiently as a result of this change and Fisher

Would this replacement be able to progress this alleged New Stadium ?

Do the potential benifits on the first two points negate the third point to a degree?

wingy

Well-Known Member

Nick

Administrator

wingy

Well-Known Member

Nick

Administrator

wingy

Well-Known Member

Nick

Administrator

wingy

Well-Known Member

wingy

Well-Known Member

Nick

Administrator

wingy

Well-Known Member

Nick

Administrator

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member

Nick

Administrator

wingy

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Fisher. Ownership .the five point plan. (1 Viewer)

Replacement of TimFisher

Would replacing Fisher lead to a better outcome as outlined in the opening post ?

Would Ticket sales and Sponsorship deals increase sufficiently as a result of this change and Fisher

Would this replacement be able to progress this alleged New Stadium ?

Do the potential benifits on the first two points negate the third point to a degree?

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency