clint van damme
Well-Known Member
if the budgets that low why was TM chasing players like Kelvin Wilson FFS?!
if the budgets that low why was TM chasing players like Kelvin Wilson FFS?!You've also been saying we had a top 6 budget. No wonder TM resigned. He failed like every other manager for the past 9!years has failed. The constant in all of this is Sisu. Maybe Fisher lied and we actually do have a top 6 budget? Don't think so, probably one of the few true things he said.
Aren't the key words 'Joy employed me?'
Pic'n'mixLittle Mix?
Really? What non league players did Barnsley sign for their first team over the summer transfer window?
Who knows I don't follow them I read an article on them and that's what they said their model was.
I read an article that said SISU batter people in court. I guess that the devil is in the detail.
I read an article that said SISU batter people in court and that's their model. I guess that the devil is in the detail.
Can someone post a brief summary on what was said pleasethank you.
If it's usual Fisher tripe, then just say Fisher tripe
not really it means the Maddison money is still covering ongoing losses until the next player is sold.Something has just dawned on me. We were at a loss of 1.7 mill last season so sold Maddison. That meant a £1.5 mill profit overall. If the club are running on an even basis now then surely the £1.5 mill profit from last season could be free to use surely?
Nah, he would be too slow
Is this in your weeman or Fisher persona?
I'm disgusted that you think I'd have a Fisher persona NW!
CA was in favour of BPA.
He said at the Trust forum soon after he arrived that the Ricoh was the only realistic option.I can assure you, CA didn't think the Ricoh was the best option...
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Apologies if you didn't. Lots on here branded TM a failure as he was underachieving based on top 6 budget..
You must have me mixed up with someone else. I've never said what budget we have, top six or not
He said at the Trust forum soon after he arrived that the Ricoh was the only realistic option.
This has all just made everything all seem even more glum than before.
There's not a lot new, but it's the confirmation of what we have feared.
This is a slippery slope to hell.
If we have a mid to lower mid budget, then I can't see how a new manager is going to suddenly have us tearing up the table, unless he is absolutely brilliant.
If he's absolutely brilliant, what's he doing here.
This is a perpetual decline and Fisher must know that season ticket sales will be down next season unless we finish on a real high.
Smaller budget, another lower table battle. The next season, smaller budget, likely relegation. Smaller budget, same ad nauseum.
Meanwhile the City fan base just goes up in a puff of smoke.
The only thing that is going to put bums on seats is a successful team out there on the pitch.
We have one single hope this season, the tinpot cup. Only a trip to Wembley and victory will give us any impetus and hope.
I always have a season ticket, but have to say, even I am having second thoughts at the moment.
We are set up to decline. Constantly cutting budgets will set us on a path to oblivion eventually.
City fans are now so fed up on failure, after failure, after failure, that only a successful team on the pitch will bring them back.
If we are starting off from a position of lower midtable budget then we are accepting mediocrity and our chances of success are incredibly limited.
I know it's a chicken and egg situation, but the difference is, there have been so many endless years of failure you will ONLY get fans back if you start doing really well.
You are now never going to get people to buy ST's and tickets in advance in the hope that , that then transfers into a bigger player budget out on the field of play.
Fans have now had enough and it is all at a very low ebb.
Only answer is investment or takeover, or just self combust and disappear into the ether.
A new man will come in, in January and have the same constraints. Yep, we get a honeymoon period and may end up midtable.
Trouble then is though, next season we will start once more with a lower midtable budget, which then again points to a challenge at the wrong end of the table.
I know you can have a smaller squad, but that hasn't served us at all well in the past.
It's all very depressing.
CCFC is Sisu. One objective of this performance seems to be to try and imply the club and Sisu are more separated than they are, presumably to deflect criticism from Joy and Sisu. Don't fall for it.
Think it was top 8 budget wasn't it?Apologies if you didn't. Lots on here branded TM a failure as he was underachieving based on top 6 budget.
are you saying it was the wrong thing to do ?
I'm disgusted that you think I'd have a Fisher persona NW!
CA was in favour of BPA.
CA was totally a WASPS fan and wanted to be at the Ricoh
Better option than anything else currently on offer. However I think crowds will be so low next season, if things don't change, that where ever we play will make little difference.Doesn't mean it's the best. Staying at the Ricoh long term is more realistic but as a club we won't benefit from it.
I am saying people did it, people knew the risks, people knew it would be CCFC getting a fine not CCFC. They can't then say it is out of order for mentioning it.
Better option than anything else currently on offer. However I think crowds will be so low next season, if things don't change, that where ever we play will make little difference.
From listening to CA his plan seemed to be to try and negotiate a better deal for the club, hence his 17 point agenda. He also said that he legal action was holding the club back and that he wished it was finished. Probably frustration at this that caused him to walk.
Really? What non league players did Barnsley sign for their first team over the summer transfer window?
I suspect that following that fisher performance many fans feel even more disheartened and disconnected from the club.
He can say it a million times but I do not believe he cares. It is and always has been about the owners investment
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?