Dion said what matters is the players and their families. This was on Football Focus right after the Villa postponement was announced.
The sense of entitlement is pretty unattractiveDion said what matters is the players and their families. This was on Football Focus right after the Villa postponement was announced.
Au Contraire - what matters is the fans, the fans, the fans.
If clubs can't apply and follow protocols then they forfeit the points.
What do the footballers actually want changing?The sense of entitlement is pretty unattractive
They want to have their cake and eat it
Never going to stop it. What Isaac Moore is being offered is a job at 16 a job as a footballer
He will probably leap frog scholar straight to pro probably on a three year contract and dream wages for a sixteen year old. Then he needs to knuckle down, there could well be loan options down to him then.
Those who are signed on as scholars yes but some jump scholarship and go straight to pro and paid accordingly at 16They are all on a standard scholarship wage at 16 whether at Man City or Stevenage
I think people are thinking of the players though.I agree with Henderson that they don't think about the players, but as others have said, many people are forced into work with far greater risk than a footballer. For starters, their job is outside for most part.
The money means nothing though, anyone can have difficulties with mental health etc.
Those who are signed on as scholars yes but some jump scholarship and go straight to pro and paid accordingly at 16
This streak of being wrong about absolutely everything is just impressive now. I hope he doesn't stop because we must be on for a record.No they don’t, a player can’t turn professional until their 17th birthday.
They can and some are are paid from 16 a lot higher than scholarship money.No they don’t, a player can’t turn professional until their 17th birthday.
They can and some are are paid from 16 a lot higher than scholarship money.
“A player under the age of 17 cannot enter into a full professional contract of employment with a club and may only be registered as an academy player, typically under a scholarship agreement,” John Shea, a senior associate at law firm Lewis Silkin, tells City A.M.
I agree with Henderson that they don't think about the players, but as others have said, many people are forced into work with far greater risk than a footballer. For starters, their job is outside for most part.
The money means nothing though, anyone can have difficulties with mental health etc.
It isn't a race to the bottom thoughJust seen Gerard say that a player didn't want to be around other players because he was showing symptoms and has a family.
Isn't this just like normal people? Do they want football to stop and footballers to sit in their house on their own?
So what's the solution? Nobody goes to work?It isn't a race to the bottom though
So what's the solution? Nobody goes to work?
I think people are thinking of the players though.
Have they said what else they want to be done?
Not sure about the British players I’d say or managers it’s a long accepted tradition, but with the influx of foreign managers it has been watered down from years ago, it used to be two games in a row 26th & 27th, the same Easter it used to be Easter Saturday then Easter Monday and Easter Tuesday night. . We also used to kick-off the season with a mid-week game v someone say Derby at home and a week later play them again away. I accept things change and three games in four days at Easter was too much gut it often sorted out promotion and relegation so it could be exciting times.They've always wanted fewer games at Christmas.
I love the busy fixture period, but it's been something players and mangers have been against for many years.
For cheese and wine?I see the premier League managers and league officials again today.
For cheese and wine?
Not sure about the British players I’d say or managers it’s a long accepted tradition, but with the influx of foreign managers it has been watered down from years ago, it used to be two games in a row 26th & 27th, the same Easter it used to be Easter Saturday then Easter Monday and Easter Tuesday night. . We also used to kick-off the season with a mid-week game v someone say Derby at home and a week later play them again away. I accept things change and three games in four days at Easter was too much gut it often sorted out promotion and relegation so it could be exciting times.
What do the footballers actually want changing?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?