Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Football & Other Sports
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

England Euros Training Squad (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Captain Dart
  • Start date May 16, 2016
Forums New posts
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
  • May 16, 2016
  • #1
I knew it Woy puts crock Wilshire in, hopefully he doesn't make the cut.
Andros Townsend and Rashford in the mix.

More to come.
 

MusicDating

Euro 2016 Prediction League Champion!!
  • May 16, 2016
  • #2
Here is that 26-man provisional squad in full.

Goalkeepers: Joe Hart, Fraser Forster, Tom Heaton.

Defenders: Nathaniel Clyne, Kyle Walker, Gary Cahill, Chris Smalling, John Stones, Ryan Bertrand, Danny Rose.

Midfielders: Dele Alli, Ross Barkley, Fabian Delph, Eric Dier, Danny Drinkwater, Jordan Henderson, Adam Lallana, James Milner, Raheem Sterling, Andros Townsend, Jack Wilshere.

Strikers: Harry Kane, Marcus Rashford, Wayne Rooney, Daniel Sturridge, Jamie Vardy.
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
  • May 16, 2016
  • #3
What has Theo Walcott done wrong?

Is Delph fit, thought he was crocked? * He's played 7 games since coming back, should be OK.
 

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
  • May 16, 2016
  • #4
Walcott's spent the last 10 years threatening to come good but never actually doing it.
 
Reactions: Covstu

skybluegod

Well-Known Member
  • May 16, 2016
  • #5
Agree with a lot of the squad but some weird inclusions.

Walcott- Doesn't deserve a space, he misses way too many easy chances, and has barely played for the second half of the season.

Wllshere while a gamble, has 3 games to get fit before the euro's so i am not too concerned, as I think he is a very important player.

Rashford- Interesting inclusion, but will be good to at least be around the squad- Think he might go as well, as RH does like taking 5 strikers.

Biggest disagreement is Sterling- Had a terrible season, and is out of form, and confidence. Should never have gone to man city.

Too many CM's in there: Dier, Delph, Alli, Wilshere, Hendo, Milner, Drinkwater

Defenders and keepers pretty much picked themselves

Who i see being left out are:
- Rashford
- Townsend
- And either one of Delph or Drinkwater

I would leave out:
- Sterling
- Delph
-Rashford

Starting line up of:
----------Hart---------
Clyne-Smalling-Cahill-Bertrand
------------Wilshere
-----Hendo------Milner
-----------Alli----------
Kane------Sturridge

Obviously that won't be the team, as Rooney will start possibly as the 10, and Alli will drop back with Milner dropped. But shall see how everyone does in the friendlies
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • May 16, 2016
  • #6
Suspect Wilshere will get a lot of minutes in the warm up games and will have to prove his fitness to make the final cut.

I'd probably leave Sterling and Wilshere out of the final squad, not sure who would be the third I'd cut.
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
  • May 16, 2016
  • #7
How has Delph made this squad?
 
Reactions: westcountry_skyblue

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
  • May 16, 2016
  • #8
Delph played most of the qualifiers so he's certainly got a fan in Hodgson.
 

skybluegod

Well-Known Member
  • May 16, 2016
  • #9
ajsccfc said:
Delph played most of the qualifiers so he's certainly got a fan in Hodgson.
Click to expand...

Will he get ahead of Hendo, Dier, Milner, Alli, Wilshere though?

Dier, is the best defensive mid we have. Henderson, is a Hodgson favourite, and adds energy to the midfield, which we require if playing a narrow formation, Milner, probably in the form of his life atm, with the amount of assists he has. Alli, been phenomenal all year. Then Wilshere, if fit, has always been one Hodgson's first names on the team sheet.

I see Delph being the one left out, if all prove fitness.Maybe Drinkwater, do we really need 7 Cm's?
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
  • May 16, 2016
  • #10
Can we take 28 please
 

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
  • May 16, 2016
  • #11
skybluegod said:
Will he get ahead of Hendo, Dier, Milner, Alli, Wilshere though?

Dier, is the best defensive mid we have. Henderson, is a Hodgson favourite, and adds energy to the midfield, which we require if playing a narrow formation, Milner, probably in the form of his life atm, with the amount of assists he has. Alli, been phenomenal all year. Then Wilshere, if fit, has always been one Hodgson's first names on the team sheet.

I see Delph being the one left out, if all prove fitness.Maybe Drinkwater, do we really need 7 Cm's?
Click to expand...

I think Delph's definitely at the back of that queue. If I had to guess I think the three dropped will be Rashford and then two of Wilshere/Henderson/Drinkwater/Delph depending on how fit the first two prove themselves to be.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • May 16, 2016
  • #12
Its absolute bullshit if Wilshire goes to the euros, he's played what 130 mins football this season, 3 friendlies in which hell probably play a max of 140-150 minutes isn't enough going into a major tournament. Have we not learned from Rooney, Owen and Beckham.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 
S

SkyBlueScottie

Well-Known Member
  • May 16, 2016
  • #13
He will be pretty fresh...
 

Nick

Administrator
  • May 16, 2016
  • #14
He needs to look at players like Drinkwater rather than Wilshere. He shouldn't be going anywhere near Wilshere based on just his name rather than what he's done!
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • May 16, 2016
  • #15
SkyBlueScottie said:
He will be pretty fresh...
Click to expand...

Haha priceless



Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
  • May 16, 2016
  • #16
Wilshere bossed the qualifying games he appeared in and he's looked with it in the meagre time he's been back so he's not really like when Rooney and Beckham were racing against the clock and sleeping in oxygen chambers or whatever. I'd only not take him if he falls apart in the next two weeks, I'd be far more confident with him tucked in midfield than Henderson or Delph.
 
Reactions: covmark

CJ_covblaze

Well-Known Member
  • May 16, 2016
  • #17
The inclusion of Delph and Wilshere over Noble is baffling. Wilshere has been had good games this campaign but after only one start following a 10 month injury lay off It's a massive risk. Says a lot though that I'd still have him ahead of Delph. Feel for Defoe too.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • May 16, 2016
  • #18
CJ_covblaze said:
The inclusion of Delph and Wilshere over Noble is baffling. Wilshere has been had good games this campaign but after only one start following a 10 month injury lay off It's a massive risk. Says a lot though that I'd still have him ahead of Delph. Feel for Defoe too.
Click to expand...
Defoe will always get goals
 
Reactions: Gazolba

Gazolba

Well-Known Member
  • May 16, 2016
  • #19
Dissapointed no place for Defoe. He really is (and probably always has been) our very best striker. Rashford will never play so a waste of a spot. We look very weak in strikers. In fact we look pretty weak everywhere except perhaps goal-keeper. But my big concern is that Rooney will play. That will doom England completely.
 

Gazolba

Well-Known Member
  • May 16, 2016
  • #20
ajsccfc said:
Walcott's spent the last 10 years threatening to come good but never actually doing it.
Click to expand...
So has Rooney and he seems to be an automatic choice.
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
  • May 16, 2016
  • #21
Gazolba said:
Dissapointed no place for Defoe. He really is (and probably always has been) our very best striker. Rashford will never play so a waste of a spot. We look very weak in strikers. In fact we look pretty weak everywhere except perhaps goal-keeper. But my big concern is that Rooney will play. That will doom England completely.
Click to expand...
When was the last tournament an England squad had the first and second highest premier league scorers in there squad?

Roy has to put his trust in Vardy and Kane, no place for Rooney I'm afraid
 

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
  • May 16, 2016
  • #22
I like Defoe, but I don't see a place for him. Vardy and Kane are ahead of him at the top and Rashford's either getting the late cut or going to sit on the bench for the experience, which seems a waste of a 33-year old's time.
 

Wyken Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • May 17, 2016
  • #23
ajsccfc said:
I like Defoe, but I don't see a place for him. Vardy and Kane are ahead of him at the top and Rashford's either getting the late cut or going to sit on the bench for the experience, which seems a waste of a 33-year old's time.
Click to expand...

You wouldn't take a striker that has scored 15 goals in a team that has been in the bottom 3 for the majority of the season?

I said the same about Andy Johnson a few years back. But no, as they play for an 'unfashionable' team they don't get a look in.

Sent from my E5823 using Tapatalk
 

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
  • May 17, 2016
  • #24
I wouldn't because he won't play. Not because he's at Sunderland, but because two English strikers have had better seasons and have more of an all-round game which fits better in the England team that Hodgson plays. Either that Rashford spot will be cut or it'll be for a player going there just to get experience being at a tournament, which is wasted on Defoe.
 

Covstu

Well-Known Member
  • May 17, 2016
  • #25
I think they need to take a real 'honest' view on Wiltshire, if he is genuinely fit then we need to take him as he is one of the best in the league when fully fit, personally have him over any other midfielder in that squad. If he's not, they need to put in another, we cannot take passengers on this trip.
You cannot take Rashford, he wont et a game and isn't ready for it. Personally thinking twice about Rooney also but he is already on that plane and strapped in. I would rather take that lanky streak of piss from West Ham and mix it up when we are chasing the game. The squad doesn't scream of a plan B if (when ) it goes tits up during a game,
 

skybluegod

Well-Known Member
  • May 17, 2016
  • #26
ajsccfc said:
I wouldn't because he won't play. Not because he's at Sunderland, but because two English strikers have had better seasons and have more of an all-round game which fits better in the England team that Hodgson plays. Either that Rashford spot will be cut or it'll be for a player going there just to get experience being at a tournament, which is wasted on Defoe.
Click to expand...

Disagree, I would say Defoe is a much better all round striker than Vardy. Vardy has pace to burn and has had an excellent season, but in a side that was built around him and Mahrez. But Defoe has scored goals in every system and every team he has played in, Defoe deserved to go.
While I agree with the sentiment of getting Rashford experience. He would have been much better off imo, going to the U21 Toulon tournament and playing.
I can see Vardy being used similarly to Welbeck and possibly as a LW, so taking Defoe would have been useful.
While Rooney is our captain, and I do like what he brings. I trust Defoe more than Rooney for goals. Rooney might even be playing as a 10.

Either way think we have to start with Sturridge and Kane, both world class strikers. Just think Defoe deserve a spot on the bench at least.
 
Reactions: Gazolba

skybluegod

Well-Known Member
  • May 17, 2016
  • #27
Covstu said:
I think they need to take a real 'honest' view on Wiltshire, if he is genuinely fit then we need to take him as he is one of the best in the league when fully fit, personally have him over any other midfielder in that squad. If he's not, they need to put in another, we cannot take passengers on this trip.
You cannot take Rashford, he wont et a game and isn't ready for it. Personally thinking twice about Rooney also but he is already on that plane and strapped in. I would rather take that lanky streak of piss from West Ham and mix it up when we are chasing the game. The squad doesn't scream of a plan B if (when ) it goes tits up during a game,
Click to expand...

Would say Kane, Sturridge and Vardy are all different types of players? While we may not be able to go long ball, and hoof it into the box, would say they all offer different traits, and are much better footballers than Andy Carroll. Plus I don't think he deserves it at all? His attitude towards football is piss poor anyway, and while on his day he can be incredible. He has one good game a season sadly.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • May 17, 2016
  • #28
skybluegod said:
Will he get ahead of Hendo, Dier, Milner, Alli, Wilshere though?

Dier, is the best defensive mid we have. Henderson, is a Hodgson favourite, and adds energy to the midfield, which we require if playing a narrow formation, Milner, probably in the form of his life atm, with the amount of assists he has. Alli, been phenomenal all year. Then Wilshere, if fit, has always been one Hodgson's first names on the team sheet.

I see Delph being the one left out, if all prove fitness.Maybe Drinkwater, do we really need 7 Cm's?
Click to expand...

Hendo [cringe] - he's another Milner but with even less about him. Leave him at home.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • May 17, 2016
  • #29
Gazolba said:
So has Rooney and he seems to be an automatic choice.
Click to expand...
Is that Wayne 177 goals in 367 club games or 51 goals in 109 international games Rooney. He gets a lot of unfair criticism, he's probably past his peak now but he was very good, been unfortunate with injuries in virtually every big tournament.
 

skybluegod

Well-Known Member
  • May 17, 2016
  • #30
fernandopartridge said:
Hendo [cringe] - he's another Milner but with even less about him. Leave him at home.
Click to expand...

Disagree, I rate Henderson highly, and was Liverpool's shining light last season, and this season has been asked to play with an injury almost all season.
Miner, only one player has got more assists in the BPL in 2016.
Both are solid players. Not world beaters, they aren't Pogba, Iniesta, Kross, etc. But they are good players. And better than any other options we have.
 
Reactions: Covstu

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • May 27, 2016
  • #31
Covstu said:
You cannot take Rashford, he wont et a game and isn't ready for it.
Click to expand...
Broken the record for youngest player to score on debut. Scored after 135 seconds. Not as quick as Kane though, he scored after 79 seconds on debut.
 
Reactions: Covstu

Nick

Administrator
  • May 27, 2016
  • #32
What's the score?
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • May 27, 2016
  • #33
1-0 to England. Although Australia are getting a lot more of the ball and a lot further forward than I'd be happy with if I was the manager.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • May 27, 2016
  • #34
Sunday league defending by Australia, good finish by Rooney 2-0

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 

Covstu

Well-Known Member
  • May 27, 2016
  • #35
chiefdave said:
Broken the record for youngest player to score on debut. Scored after 135 seconds. Not as quick as Kane though, he scored after 79 seconds on debut.
Click to expand...
Yep glad to be wrong!
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Football & Other Sports
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?