We miss EMC more than Tats imo.Just been having a look and he was unavailable for 14 league games last season. Over a quarter of the season. And now again, probably be gone until after the international break
Hes a decent player but as with Sheaf, whats the point if you cant use him??
Do we feel we miss him more or less than when Tats is out?
Villa used 14 players all season in title winning season 80/81. I would think that figure for Forest wouldn't be far offI'm not sure if it's true or not but I have a thought in my head that Nottm Forest managed a season including European games using only 17 players
That's a bit over the top.He's definitely a liability.
This is the real issue, wouldn't be so bad if we had more than 2 actual wingers in the squad.Its highlighted more in a smaller squad which ofcourse isnt his fault
Underrated annoying part for me is how there doesn’t seem to be any youngsters in attacking positions even close to breaking into the 1st team squad to give us an option out wide on the bench.
He's a far bigger goal threat and provider of chances than Sakamoto.EMC at his best is a more potent threat than Tatsu, but at the average of both of their performances Tatsu is the better player and especially when paired with Milan.
I also think EMC has a broader range of performances than Tatsu does and so his worst games are worse, too.
Definitely. Especially to a team who play bloody wing backs.makes the rapha loan out a weird one?
Definitely. Especially to a team who play bloody wing backs.
Their xG and xA stats are very similar. Sakamoto is actually ranking slightly better than EMC than this season, although EMC is slightly ahead on a Per90 basis.He's a far bigger goal threat and provider of chances than Sakamoto.
not really, FL thinks he is nowhere near ready and is happy to player strikers, full backs, and even potentially a back tree before give him serious minutes in an important match.makes the rapha loan out a weird one?
Their xG and xA stats are very similar. Sakamoto is actually ranking slightly better than EMC than this season, although EMC is slightly ahead on a Per90 basis.
You heard anythingRumour has it
Oh yeah, I just meant I was surprised how close it was this season so farThis is their entire Championship career compared on a per 90 basis:
2.5 x better xG and 2x better xA
View attachment 46216
Definitely. Especially to a team who play bloody wing backs.
Really must not rate him if he'd play a tree first!not really, FL thinks he is nowhere near ready and is happy to player strikers, full backs, and even potentially a back tree before give him serious minutes in an important match.
Consistently played 40+ games a seasonWhat was his injury record like at Posh and Barnet?
Turns out that having one decent game vs a L1 b team doesn't suddenly make you ready to start for a top 6 championship team. Who'd have thought?not really, FL thinks he is nowhere near ready and is happy to player strikers, full backs, and even potentially a back tree before give him serious minutes in an important match.
Aye but he’d be an option off the bench rather just bringing on full backs or centre mids.Not really. He’s showing nothing to suggest he’s remotely capable yet at this level
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?