In cutting cancer research for children, American children will almost certainly die as a result of that man's actions. All in the name of triggering the libs of course.Opinion | Musk Said No One Has Died Since Aid Was Cut. That Isn’t True.
A journey through the front lines of global poverty shows that when the world’s richest men slash aid for the world’s poorest children, the result is sickness, starvation and death.www.nytimes.com
A long read, but an interesting one. Even if you think the estimates are way out, you're still talking about hundreds of thousands (if not millions) dead within a year, so the United States can save on a tiny fraction of its budget.
I completely accept the argument that the US (nor any country) has no obligation to spend money on foreign aid. But for someone who's supposedly very concerned about the future of humanity, how does Musk rationalise this?
He's only interested in the future of humanity as long as it fits in with his idea of what it should be.Opinion | Musk Said No One Has Died Since Aid Was Cut. That Isn’t True.
A journey through the front lines of global poverty shows that when the world’s richest men slash aid for the world’s poorest children, the result is sickness, starvation and death.www.nytimes.com
A long read, but an interesting one. Even if you think the estimates are way out, you're still talking about hundreds of thousands (if not millions) dead within a year, so the United States can save on a tiny fraction of its budget.
I completely accept the argument that the US (nor any country) has no obligation to spend money on foreign aid. But for someone who's supposedly very concerned about the future of humanity, how does Musk rationalise this?
I would love someone to ask him how he plans to ensure his future Mars colony reflects existing demographics on Earth.He's only interested in the future of humanity as long as it fits in with his idea of what it should be.
Amazing!
Never heard that one. Is Peak Corbyn a song with HIM wearing a cap, instead of Musk?This is worse than peak Corbyn
What's that stand for? Twatman?
He has a disturbing attitude towards everyone, partly due to Asperger's meaning he finds empathy almost impossible.He sounds like a deeply odd man with a drug problem and a borderline disturbing attitude towards women
He has a disturbing attitude towards everyone, partly due to Asperger's meaning he finds empathy almost impossible.
And also he thinks humans should increase their population massively, and his genes especially. So yeah his attitude to women is pretty much baby machines. But did you expect anything other than an incel from head of the tech bros?
It definitely isn't true, a ridiculous statementNot sure you can blame being a bit spergy tbh. Plenty of people with Asperger’s aren’t a dick like him. Not sure the idea they “find empathy impossible” is true.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?