not for cup games. The tickets are an additional purchase and cant be counted unless purchased for that game.Why would sisu pay more to C and E than is necessary. Remember most lloyds stand is corporate so they count if there or not.
I can understand that BUT why would they post a higher gate!When John Poynton was chairman i saw some amazing attendance figures.
Remember being crushed on the Kop without a spare seat going in Highfield Rd against Arsenal & amazingly there was only about 19000 there!
I can understand that BUT why would they post a higher gate!
Are you seriously suggesting that SISU would post a higher than actual gate, simply to "get one over", the protesters? knowing that they would have to pay tax on that higher gate?To make out the protest/ boycott had no effect higher than the last 2 FA 3rd round home games ..really??(portsmouth replay included)
Are you seriously suggesting that SISU would post a higher than actual gate, simply to "get one over", the protesters? knowing that they would have to pay tax on that higher gate?
Surely tax is paid on profit?
not for cup games. The tickets are an additional purchase and cant be counted unless purchased for that game.
Are you seriously suggesting that SISU would post a higher than actual gate, simply to "get one over", the protesters? knowing that they would have to pay tax on that higher gate?
And we dont make any of that.....Surely tax is paid on profit?
they lie to the fans and everybody else so im sure the TAXMAN is not that special that they would lie to him to !!:jerkit::jerkit:
And we dont make any of that.....
Missing the point this lie would cost more money.
I can understand that BUT why would they post a higher gate!
not missing the point it would save face for SISU with there investors worth a dam sight more than a few grand !!
I think this is mildly dillussional thinking.
And what they report in public is what they report to the tax man ???
can be explained as PR to the taxman
Exactly, and by saying a neat round figure they can say to the taxman that it was an "approximate" figure! Jesus, it's not like we have access to their dialogue with the taxman. Simple PR to try and limit the perceived success of the protest. It's BLATANTLY OBVIOUS, people!
Don't know if the rules have changed since I left Blighty, but it used to be for the FA Cup games, the home team got 66% of the 'gate' money, the away team the remaining 33%. If this is still the case, why would they inflate the 'gate' ....to pay more to Southampton? It is based on tickets sold, not physical attendance. Thems the rules....I believe!
Sanity, at last.
You thought about typing "common sense", then remembered how rare it is these days?
Don't know if the rules have changed since I left Blighty, but it used to be for the FA Cup games, the home team got 66% of the 'gate' money, the away team the remaining 33%. If this is still the case, why would they inflate the 'gate' ....to pay more to Southampton? It is based on tickets sold, not physical attendance. Thems the rules....I believe!
It means V.A.T.Vodka and tonic?!
cup tickets are free in the premier club its part of the dealnot for cup games. The tickets are an additional purchase and cant be counted unless purchased for that game.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?