Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
I thought that was Mogg's remit as SoS for the 1800s
I thought that was Mogg's remit as SoS for the 1800sNext culture war: time.
Frighteningly I agree with him, though!Next culture war: time.
Frighteningly I agree with him, though!
While I agree the whole idea is meaningless, he's wrong about enjoying another hour of darkness. There's the same amount of darkness (well, about 6 minutes more) as the day before. You just need to get up earlier you lazy prick.Frighteningly I agree with him, though!
Why?And if we did stay on one time it'd be GMT, not BST.
It’s very cuntish isn’t it
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Forensic that is…..
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
No matter what the principled response is, do not say anything, ever, that might scare The Daily Mail. And don't let anyone else in your party say it either.
If we're that desperate for Tory votes we might as well get Kenneth Clarke in to run the party. He's probably further to the left and less worried about upsetting The Mail than Starmer is turning out to be.
It’s not about Tory votes. It’s about distancing from Corbyns Labour. And the fact that a large chunk of the anti-Corbyn left made being pro Israel a huge part of their identity.
The left of the party wasn't anti-Corbyn, and in fairness nor were most of the membership. It was primarily the PLP that didn't like him.
Starmer has gone some way beyond just moving away from Corbyn. Despite what he said when running for election, he's shifted the whole party way to the right and brooks no dissent, even on issues such as this.
If he's not interested in Tory votes then I don't know why he so closely follows government policy on this, and spending commitments, right to roam, child benefit cap, etc etc.
Starmer is playing it coy - he’s not getting involved In a massively divisive issue.. so he remains on the fenceI mean some were. But that’s not what I said. Not the left of Labour. The left full stop. Be they in Labour or not.
And I mean he is interested in Tory votes. That’s how you win an election. Tory policy is Tory policy generally because it wins elections. The stuff they want is the tax breaks and chances to raid the treasury, but they don’t put that on the manifesto.
He’s a spineless, gutless excuse for a leader, and it would appear a pretty shit Human rights lawyer based on his recent statements.Starmer is playing it coy - he’s not getting involved In a massively divisive issue.. so he remains on the fence
I don’t disagree - but at the moment the tories are literally digging their own graves, what Starmer doesn’t need to do is Wade into a highly charged debate that may change that. Like it or not he’s politicking to win a general electionHe’s a spineless, gutless excuse for a leader, and it would appear a pretty shit Human rights lawyer based on his recent statements.
This is about innocent people losing their lives in a terrible conflict. If he hasn’t even got the principles to challenge that then why do we want to swap one spineless, insipid clown for another?I don’t disagree - but at the moment the tories are literally digging their own graves, what Starmer doesn’t need to do is Wade into a highly charged debate that may change that. Like it or not he’s politicking to win a general election
this is why you don’t hear any policies yet, let the tories continue to shoot themselves in the foot and don’t give them or the media any ammunition.
frustrating, boring or unprincipled - but it’s the way to guarentee he sits in 10 Downing Street in 18 months time
I nominate Ftumch as the safe word. It’s a well known fact that it can’t be said by accident, unlike Orgo.I just can't
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
I don’t disagree - we’re at the point where the best option to the current turd is a polished turd.This is about innocent people losing their lives in a terrible conflict. If he hasn’t even got the principles to challenge that then why do we want to swap one spineless, insipid clown for another?
Why the fuck is the PM interviewing anyone like he's Terry Wogan or something in the first place? Utterly bizarre.
Presumably he's already working on his post-PM tech bro career and trying to line stuff up ready for when he's booted out.
This is about innocent people losing their lives in a terrible conflict. If he hasn’t even got the principles to challenge that then why do we want to swap one spineless, insipid clown for another?
Unecessary risk to piss off a section of the electorateIt’s pointless though, you get that right? Like it makes absolutely no real world difference. It would just be to make people like you and me happy.
I wonder if AI could help Sunak access his WhatsApp?
I find it absolutely astounding they’re allowed to get away with that.
I know there’s the end-to-end encryption but surely GCHQ have managed to work around it?
Clearly not. Hence the “encryption is terrorism” shite not so long ago.
A good sign for what GCHQ haven’t managed to crack is what the politicians use TBF.
But any govt minister should have strict infosec policies that should preclude this crap. There has to be a paper trail, surely?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?