Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Do you want to discuss boring politics? (18 Viewers)

  • Thread starter mrtrench
  • Start date Jun 14, 2020
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 716
  • 717
  • 718
  • 719
  • 720
  • …
  • 1497
Next
First Prev 718 of 1497 Next Last

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 5, 2023
  • #25,096
It’s mental we can’t teach kids a trade a school. Replace/augment D&T or whatever it’s called this week with it.
 
Reactions: Sky_Blue_Dreamer, Nick and Ian1779

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 5, 2023
  • #25,097
shmmeee said:
It’s mental we can’t teach kids a trade a school. Replace/augment D&T or whatever it’s called this week with it.
Click to expand...

Or let those who aren't so academically minded take up apprentiships a year or 2 earlier.
 
Reactions: Sky_Blue_Dreamer, CCFCSteve, Nick and 3 others

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 5, 2023
  • #25,098
clint van damme said:
Or let those who aren't so academically minded take up apprentiships a year or 2 earlier.
Click to expand...

Though even then I’m not a massive fan of this split. I would like my hairdressers and plumbers to have a bit about them!

Just thinking it’s one lesson to teach a kid how to replace a plug or swap out a light switch or plumb a tap put up a shelf or something. At least start them off a bit.

But yeah, at 14 there should be that option to go to a “trade school” even if only a couple of days a week with a day on the job or something. Hell a few of them could go around the school fixing leaks or building shelves for classrooms or whatever if finding businesses is too hard. Could even expand into the community doing odd jobs. So little imagination. It’s like a school I was at that ran childcare courses from Y10, the girls fucking hated it cos it was all classroom based learning. Just completely unable to think outside that box.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jan 5, 2023
  • #25,099
shmmeee said:
Just thinking it’s one lesson to teach a kid how to replace a plug
Click to expand...
That was, tbf, in my Physics lessons pre GCSE
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 5, 2023
  • #25,100
Deleted member 5849 said:
That was, tbf, in my Physics lessons pre GCSE
Click to expand...

Good for your physics teacher. We just drew lightbulb and switch diagrams
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 5, 2023
  • #25,101
Good to see Labour really really trying their best to tell me not to vote for them. In a period where public services are collapsing due to austerity they're promising not to spend more money.
 
Reactions: Bugsy and Ian1779

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 5, 2023
  • #25,102
fernandopartridge said:
Good to see Labour really really trying their best to tell me not to vote for them. In a period where public services are collapsing due to austerity they're promising not to spend more money.
Click to expand...
Is the taking back control slogan not working for you?
 
Reactions: skybluetony176

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 5, 2023
  • #25,103
chiefdave said:
Is the taking back control slogan not working for you?
Click to expand...
I'm not bothered about slogans, I care about the substance. It does seem a bit of a silly slogan as he once again does a wanker sign to the silly centrist and FBPE types who coveted him.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 5, 2023
  • #25,104
“Why do Labour keep doing things that have lead to a massive polling lead when trying to get elected and not specifically to me, a young lefty in a safe Labour seat? “
 
Reactions: PVA

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 5, 2023
  • #25,105
shmmeee said:
“Why do Labour keep doing things that have lead to a massive polling lead when trying to get elected and not specifically to me, a young lefty in a safe Labour seat?
“
Click to expand...
As I've posted here previously I live in a very tight marginal, just under 600 vote majority for Tories in 2019

How can something said today be responsible for the results of a poll taken last week?
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jan 5, 2023
  • #25,106
fernandopartridge said:
As I've posted here previously I live in a very tight marginal, just under 600 vote majority for Tories in 2019

How can something said today be responsible for the results of a poll taken last week?
Click to expand...
Out of interest, what was its majority in 2017?
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 5, 2023
  • #25,107
fernandopartridge said:
As I've posted here previously I live in a very tight marginal, just under 600 vote majority for Tories in 2019

How can something said today be responsible for the results of a poll taken last week?
Click to expand...

You’re not a swing voter. You aren’t going to vote Tory ever.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 5, 2023
  • #25,108
Deleted member 5849 said:
Out of interest, what was its majority in 2017?
Click to expand...
Labour majority of just under 2.5k in 2017

Tory majority of just under 5k in 2015 and 2010

Labour majority of 9k in 1997, the seat was retained in the next couple of elections but the majority was down to <800 by 2005.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 5, 2023
  • #25,109
shmmeee said:
“Why do Labour keep doing things that have lead to a massive polling lead when trying to get elected and not specifically to me, a young lefty in a safe Labour seat? “
Click to expand...
Is it things Labour have done that has caused them to lead in the polls or is it more the absolute fucking mess the Conservatives have made of pretty much everything?
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 5, 2023
  • #25,110
chiefdave said:
Is it things Labour have done that has caused them to lead in the polls or is it more the absolute fucking mess the Conservatives have made of pretty much everything?
Click to expand...

Little column A little column B, but as we saw in 2017 and 2019 it’s possible for a government to be fucking useless and still ahead in the polls.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete
C

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 5, 2023
  • #25,111
chiefdave said:
Is it things Labour have done that has caused them to lead in the polls or is it more the absolute fucking mess the Conservatives have made of pretty much everything?
Click to expand...

Both, mainly Tory shitshow but don’t discount the benefits of Starmer being seen as just a sensible, competent and less threatening alternative than someone like Corbyn. Whether some like it or not, he has restored some credibility for Labour amongst the electorate. He just doesn’t really inspire although I don’t think that’s the publics main concern at the moment - this could change in the coming months as there’s not a huge difference between him and Sunak on a personality level.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jan 5, 2023
  • #25,112
CCFCSteve said:
Both, mainly Tory shitshow but don’t discount the benefits of Starmer being seen as just a sensible, competent and less threatening alternative than someone like Corbyn. Whether some like it or not, he has restored some credibility for Labour amongst the electorate. He just doesn’t really inspire although I don’t think that’s the publics main concern at the moment - this could change in the coming months as there’s not a huge difference between him and Sunak on a personality level.
Click to expand...
'Safe' is probably an asset after Johnson and Truss!
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 5, 2023
  • #25,113
CCFCSteve said:
Both, mainly Tory shitshow but don’t discount the benefits of Starmer being seen as just a sensible, competent and less threatening alternative than someone like Corbyn. Whether some like it or not, he has restored some credibility for Labour amongst the electorate. He just doesn’t really inspire although I don’t think that’s the publics main concern at the moment - this could change in the coming months as there’s not a huge difference between him and Sunak on a personality level.
Click to expand...

Its all about baseline expectations as well. People already think Labour will be radical and spend on public services and be green or whatever. Their messaging is from that starting point. Same as the Tories are cruel but good with money (until recently) so their messaging has to come from that starting point.

Was reading a good discussion between politicos on Laboura Brexit strategy the other day. One was bemoaning the lack of clear support for joining the EEA, and another (also pro EU, but a polling rather than policy expert) was pointing out that Labours trust on Brexit is very fragile and would lead to all the old framing questions but no one really believes they’ve gone anti EU and so they’d pay little penalty for changing tack post election.

People want honesty in campaigning but it’s incredibly naive and just not how human psychology works. The same message from different people is taken in entirely different ways.

Labours policy platform is actually pretty radical if you dig into the details. But they can’t present it as that as it plays into voter preconceptions. So it’s presented as austere and common sense instead, despite still being a Labour platform. And we know this works because even politicly engaged lefties believe the vibes rather than actually looking at the policy detail.

We’ve seen it here with the same words spoken by Starmer and Corbyn are taken two different ways.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jan 5, 2023
  • #25,114
Groundhog day.

A Keir Starmer government might be more radical than you think | Michael Jacobs

The party’s policies on the economy, devolution, workers’ rights and the environment pack a punch, writes professor of political economy Michael Jacobs
www.theguardian.com
 
Reactions: shmmeee

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 5, 2023
  • #25,115
clint van damme said:
Or let those who aren't so academically minded take up apprentiships a year or 2 earlier.
Click to expand...

its possible to have engineering / practical colleges and start them at 14 as well as getting them to do basic gcse education so they get some education - also as practical work is often self employed so some basic business knowledge m

The reality is no one at that age wants to do it. A skilled welder employed could command £50 grand a year easily. Plumber £80 self employed grand and an electrician the same.

People now see not attending some form of university as a failure so you end up with the only people generally going into these apprenticeships as people who can’t find anything else to do then end up seeing apprentices as low paid and take another job in a shop or McDonald’s as it’s easier
 
Reactions: Ian1779, chiefdave and nicksar

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 5, 2023
  • #25,116
Grendel said:
its possible to have engineering / practical colleges and start them at 14 as well as getting them to do basic gcse education so they get some education - also as practical work is often self employed so some basic business knowledge m

The reality is no one at that age wants to do it. A skilled welder employed could command £50 grand a year easily. Plumber £80 self employed grand and an electrician the same.

People now see not attending some form of university as a failure so you end up with the only people generally going into these apprenticeships as people who can’t find anything else to do then end up seeing apprentices as low paid and take another job in a shop or McDonald’s as it’s easier
Click to expand...

Not sure where you’ve got this from. Certainly not my experience when teaching. I was told that insurance and H&S meant a lot of firms were reluctant to take on U18s though.

A quick glance at industry body research also suggests lack of involvement from companies is the issue.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 5, 2023
  • #25,117
shmmeee said:
Not sure where you’ve got this from. Certainly not my experience when teaching. I was told that insurance and H&S meant a lot of firms were reluctant to take on U18s though.
Click to expand...

i meant it’s possible if you want to change the legislation to develop engineering and practical colleges are that age

many firms do take 16 year olds on as apprentices in manufacturing the issue is the drop out rate is horrendous as many aren’t interested and are only doing it as they don’t want to stay in education

there’s no insurance issues - you do have to have specific H and S requirements but the HSE assessments aren’t that different
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jan 5, 2023
  • #25,118
Grendel said:
People now see not attending some form of university as a failure so you end up with the only people generally going into these apprenticeships as people who can’t find anything else to do then end up seeing apprentices as low paid and take another job in a shop or McDonald’s as it’s easier
Click to expand...
That's changing a little, tbf.

Easier said than done, but the snobbery both ways needs to end. Accept a degree course that isn't immediately 'practical' can still be useful, accept that training as a plumber isn't the failure's option.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 5, 2023
  • #25,119
Grendel said:
i meant it’s possible if you want to change the legislation to develop engineering and practical colleges are that age

many firms do take 16 year olds on as apprentices in manufacturing the issue is the drop out rate is horrendous as many aren’t interested and are only doing it as they don’t want to stay in education
Click to expand...

Yeah it would need a legislation change. I think drop out rates are pretty high across the board for apprenticeships, 35% on average. Which suggests a bigger problem with the structure.

Tell a lie, it’s up to 47%: Shock as half of apprentices drop out
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 5, 2023
  • #25,120
Deleted member 5849 said:
That's changing a little, tbf.

Easier said than done, but the snobbery both ways needs to end. Accept a degree course that isn't immediately 'practical' can still be useful, accept that training as a plumber isn't the failure's option.
Click to expand...

This is kind of the issue. Training to be skilled in engineering is a skill. The guy with a PHD in biological science I wouldn’t trust to wire a business to current standards or fix my toilet. It’s just a different skill but it’s a skill and short supply
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 5, 2023
  • #25,121
shmmeee said:
Yeah it would need a legislation change. I think drop out rates are pretty high across the board for apprenticeships, 35% on average. Which suggests a bigger problem with the structure.

Tell a lie, it’s up to 47%: Shock as half of apprentices drop out
Click to expand...

Admittedly the scheme doesn’t help. It’s open to abuse from employers - also from colleges which aren’t that bothered other than filling spaces and being paid a lot of money for the course places.

They just want to fill spaces, will lower educational requirements to get government money

Needs a complete overhaul
 
Reactions: shmmeee
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jan 5, 2023
  • #25,122
Grendel said:
Admittedly the scheme doesn’t help. It’s open to abuse from employers - also from colleges which aren’t that bothered other than filling spaces and being paid a lot of money for the course places.

They just want to fill spaces, will lower educational requirements to get government money

Needs a complete overhaul
Click to expand...
Yeah, also doesn't help when some have no obvious career progression within the company they're at, either. Do the apprenticeship, leave- where's the incentive in that case, other than a nebulous qualification? And effectively you know the employer's using you for cheap labour too, they're not invested in you, so why should you be with them?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 5, 2023
  • #25,123
Deleted member 5849 said:
Yeah, also doesn't help when some have no obvious career progression within the company they're at, either. Do the apprenticeship, leave- where's the incentive in that case, other than a nebulous qualification? And effectibely you know the employer's using you for cheap labour too, they're not invested in you, so why should you be with them?
Click to expand...

True to an extent but as I say the colleges are only interested in the £9 grand a year per student as well offer little or no support to the employer and are also only actually interested in signing companies in and enrolling students

A lot of apprentices leave companies well before completion as they only do it as they have to be at a college education until 18 - a lot of businesses do invest properly and it’s a let down
 
P

PVA

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 5, 2023
  • #25,124
The absolute state of this


 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 5, 2023
  • #25,125
Grendel said:
Admittedly the scheme doesn’t help. It’s open to abuse from employers - also from colleges which aren’t that bothered other than filling spaces and being paid a lot of money for the course places.

They just want to fill spaces, will lower educational requirements to get government money

Needs a complete overhaul
Click to expand...

I did the Marconi apprenticeship after leaving school at 16. Basically college (internal) with some work in the holidays first two years and six months work/college (Cov College) split the next two. Was great, got my quals, worked all over the business, could see a clear pathway to a career.

We got an apprentice in my last job. Boss literally wanted someone to do shit work for less than NMW, “training” was the odd day every few months with some shitty company who were clearly in it for the cash. I basically told her to get some experience then fuck off and find a proper job when I left. And she could only afford it because her husband earned enough to look after her.

I’m sure there’s good schemes out there, and in my day they were like hens teeth. I remember feeling honoured to have got a place at Marconi and valuing it highly. But some of the shite out there I wonder if it hasn’t devalued the whole thing in some peoples eyes. And I agree the whole “stay in education but not school” thing backfired massively. Same as the student support for sixth form, kids just wanting their mark to get their cash.

If the leaving age is 18 make it compulsory and improve links with technical training and schools or have trade schools and have fewer higher quality apprenticeships at 18 with a proper career path. Hell, give them the same financial support Uni students get.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 5, 2023
  • #25,126
skybluetony176 said:
Trouble is the price cap isn’t fit for purpose as it’s based on the most expensive form of generation (gas) not the cheapest (renewables) so it isn’t going to bring down energy prices anytime soon. Makes you wonder why people are so anti renewables and pro fossil fuel though. There literally isn’t a logical reason to not phase out fossil fuel generation in favour of renewables, even if you’re a climate change denier.
Click to expand...
We all know the reason why.

Lots of wealthy and influential people heavily invested in fossil fuels and they don't want to lose out, so they exert pressure on the politicians. In some cases they're the same people.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 5, 2023
  • #25,127
Grendel said:
Admittedly the scheme doesn’t help. It’s open to abuse from employers - also from colleges which aren’t that bothered other than filling spaces and being paid a lot of money for the course places.

They just want to fill spaces, will lower educational requirements to get government money

Needs a complete overhaul
Click to expand...
It all goes back years to target setting for apprenticeship volumes (Labour and the coalition did this), when I worked for the SFA, the measure of performance for colleges and training providers was how many learners they recruited. It leads to all sorts of dysfunctional behaviour and ultimately lots of wasted time and money.
 
Reactions: shmmeee

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 5, 2023
  • #25,128
fernandopartridge said:
It all goes back years to target setting for apprenticeship volumes (Labour and the coalition did this), when I worked for the SFA, the measure of performance for colleges and training providers was how many learners they recruited. It leads to all sorts of dysfunctional behaviour and ultimately lots of wasted time and money.
Click to expand...

They don’t call them walking cheques in FE for nothing.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 5, 2023
  • #25,129
Is there a single target handed down from government that hasn’t lead to disasterous unintended consequences? Serious question.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 5, 2023
  • #25,130
SkyBlueCharlie9 said:
Old fashioned Tory soundbites on importance of extra maths and grammar etc.
I loved GCSE maths. A-Level Maths (pure & applied) was a fcuking nightmare.
Yes maths and physics is vital for the Country and the bright sparks....but not for everyone. Conservatives need to invest in design and arts too as also massive contributers to the Country's economy.
Click to expand...
Agreed. People all have different areas of skills and interests, yet we seem determined to tell kids that these few things are worthwhile but everything else is just a waste of time and they're not trying at the 'hard' subjects. I did well at school, but if the 'core' subjects had been stuff like PE, D&T or art I'd have left with barely a qualification.

We need to value things more widely rather than denigrating them. Stuff like emptying bins might not be glamorous or highly skilled, but it's goddamn important.

Also the obsession with getting young people to university etc (started under a Labour govt) has had a massive detrimental knock on effect both in devaluing the qualification and creating a situation where very few are willing to do the more menial jobs on offer having invested so much time and effort into their education to avoid that. It's all very well wanting everyone to have qualified, highly skilled jobs and high pay, but all those other jobs will still need doing.
 
Reactions: nicksar, ccfc1234 and CCFCSteve
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 716
  • 717
  • 718
  • 719
  • 720
  • …
  • 1497
Next
First Prev 718 of 1497 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 11 (members: 0, guests: 11)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?