Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Do you want to discuss boring politics? (21 Viewers)

  • Thread starter mrtrench
  • Start date Jun 14, 2020
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 663
  • 664
  • 665
  • 666
  • 667
  • …
  • 1497
Next
First Prev 665 of 1497 Next Last
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • #23,241
Interesting watching Question Time where the Tory MP called Starmer's plans more radical than Truss, just after a Financial Times person said substantively they're not dissimilar to Jeremy Hunt's
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • #23,242
Grendel said:
hasn’t he said due to the economic position he won’t be able to do “as many labour things as he’d like to”
Click to expand...
It's nonsense and it's exactly the same narrative that'll under pin the savage austerity of Sunak

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
 
C

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • #23,243
fernandopartridge said:
Why are labour playing in the same spaces then?

Myths like the "sound money" drivel by Starmer. If Labour is guaranteed a victory it should seize its opportunity to do something transformative.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Labour are currently polling 20-30+ points ahead of Tories. This is based pretty on competency with a bit more compassion which is obviously the right strategy at the moment so why change it ?!*

The only way I can see Labour fucking this up is all of a sudden coming up with a load of radical/transformative policies that scare a proportion of the electorate into sticking with what they know….however shit they are

ultimately they need appeal to the whole country. They can also do more transformative stuff once in power and after economy etc has stabilised

*if Sunak wins, Labour will probably have to up it’s game/offer more rather than just focus on competency. However there’s challenging economic times ahead, inflation/energy prices and likely increased unemployment on way as well as potential divisions in the Tory party still, so I’d imagine just being seen as a safer, sensible, competent pair of hands will be enough to win next election barring a significant global event/improvements pre GE
 
Reactions: Deleted member 9744 and Deleted member 5849

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • #23,244
fernandopartridge said:
Why are labour playing in the same spaces then?

Myths like the "sound money" drivel by Starmer. If Labour is guaranteed a victory it should seize its opportunity to do something transformative.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Did you miss the recent PM who spooked the markets and lasted less time than a lettuce?
 
Reactions: Skybluefaz, Deleted member 9744 and Sky Blue Pete

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • #23,245
CCFCSteve said:
Labour are currently polling 20-30+ points ahead of Tories. This is based pretty on competency with a bit more compassion which is obviously the right strategy at the moment so why change it ?!*

The only way I can see Labour fucking this up is all of a sudden coming up with a load of radical/transformative policies that scare a proportion of the electorate into sticking with what they know….however shit they are

ultimately they need appeal to the whole country. They can also do more transformative stuff once in power and after economy etc has stabilised

*if Sunak wins, Labour will probably have to up it’s game/offer more rather than just focus on competency. However there’s challenging economic times ahead, inflation/energy prices and likely increased unemployment on way as well as potential divisions in the Tory party still, so I’d imagine just being seen as a safer, sensible, competent pair of hands will be enough to win next election barring a significant global event/improvements pre GE
Click to expand...

I think the right angle is going to be “why is this very rich man not getting his very rich mates to pay for the mistake his other mates made?”

Labour need some serious proposals on taxing the very wealthy that Sunak will find hard to argue against thanks to being one of the very wealthy.
 
Reactions: AOM, Sky_Blue_Dreamer and Sick Boy

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • #23,246
shmmeee said:
Did you miss the recent PM who spooked the markets and lasted less time than a lettuce?
Click to expand...

Are you suggesting that actual investment is the same as tax cuts for the very rich?
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • #23,247
CCFCSteve said:
Labour are currently polling 20-30+ points ahead of Tories. This is based pretty on competency with a bit more compassion which is obviously the right strategy at the moment so why change it ?!*

The only way I can see Labour fucking this up is all of a sudden coming up with a load of radical/transformative policies that scare a proportion of the electorate into sticking with what they know….however shit they are

ultimately they need appeal to the whole country. They can also do more transformative stuff once in power and after economy etc has stabilised

*if Sunak wins, Labour will probably have to up it’s game/offer more rather than just focus on competency. However there’s challenging economic times ahead, inflation/energy prices and likely increased unemployment on way as well as potential divisions in the Tory party still, so I’d imagine just being seen as a safer, sensible, competent pair of hands will be enough to win next election barring a significant global event/improvements pre GE
Click to expand...

The premise of the post I responded to was that Sunak had no chance of winning
 
C

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • #23,248
fernandopartridge said:
The premise of the post I responded to was that Sunak had no chance of winning
Click to expand...

Yeah, I agree. He’s very unlikely to win, I was just saying Labour moving too far away from what they have been doing might open the door a little
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • #23,249
I think we all realise that we’re in the shit and will all have to pay. The difference between the Tories and Labour is Labour plan to make dealing with that shit fairer. Actual windfall tax on windfall profits, closing tax loopholes including non dom status and charity status for private education. The fact is picking up the cost of the mess the country is in will be fairer under Labour than it will the Tories and that’s enough.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • #23,250
fernandopartridge said:
Are you suggesting that actual investment is the same as tax cuts for the very rich?
Click to expand...

Im saying radical economics may not go down well. I think the first term Labour are going to have to show they aren’t mental. They’re going to have to balance day to day spending, which was the issue with the tax cuts. So they’ll need to find extra revenue from somewhere if they don’t want austerity.
 
Reactions: Sky_Blue_Dreamer and CCFCSteve
C

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • #23,251
shmmeee said:
I think the right angle is going to be “why is this very rich man not getting his very rich mates to pay for the mistake his other mates made?”

Labour need some serious proposals on taxing the very wealthy that Sunak will find hard to argue against thanks to being one of the very wealthy.
Click to expand...

Yeah, that will be the angle of attack, especially if inflation continues so the public are squeezed even more. Any decision to not support people will be met with ‘he doesn’t understand what it’s like to be us’

It will be interesting to see how he combats that.

ps theres no doubt in my mind that Johnson will be planning a return if/when Tories lose next election
 
Reactions: RegTheDonk and shmmeee

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • #23,252
CCFCSteve said:
Yeah, that will be the angle of attack, especially if inflation continues so the public are squeezed even more. Any decision to not support people will be met with ‘he doesn’t understand what it’s like to be us’

It will be interesting to see how he combats that.

ps theres no doubt in my mind that Johnson will be planning a return if/when Tories lose next election
Click to expand...

I think what will do for Johnson is that under Sunak it’s the “red wall” seats they’re mostly likely to lose. Saw some research this morning showing it’s the more left economically voters that Johnson brought in who are deserting them.

A lot of Johnson’s power base was the 2019 intake that owed him their seats, outside of them it’s the headbanger rump. I think if there’s a landslide Labour victory, the seats that are left won’t produce MPs that would back Johnson. Could be wrong though, I’ve not don’t the hard yards looking at actual seats.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • #23,253
shmmeee said:
Im saying radical economics may not go down well. I think the first term Labour are going to have to show they aren’t mental. They’re going to have to balance day to day spending, which was the issue with the tax cuts. So they’ll need to find extra revenue from somewhere if they don’t want austerity.
Click to expand...

Balancing day to day spending just removes private sector surpluses - it doesn't make any sense in trying to recover the economy. Making such promises will make doing anything useful very difficult and provide an open goal to the Tories come 2029. This is the deficit shown as a % of GDP over the last 25 years, you can pretty much track declining public services with the deficit aside from the covid year.

 
C

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • #23,254
skybluetony176 said:
I think we all realise that we’re in the shit and will all have to pay. The difference between the Tories and Labour is Labour plan to make dealing with that shit fairer. Actual windfall tax on windfall profits, closing tax loopholes including non dom status and charity status for private education. The fact is picking up the cost of the mess the country is in will be fairer under Labour than it will the Tories and that’s enough.
Click to expand...

Agreed. Sunaks not stupid though and if he’s not in the pockets of the right (I don’t think so but I was a bit concerned when some came out early to support him) he might try to address this argument.

Major balancing act whoevers in charge. They desperately need us to be as/if not more competitive for businesses but need cash from somewhere

I’ve heard that Sunak is less ideologically driven on Brexit which, if true, may help solve some of the issues
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • #23,255
fernandopartridge said:
Balancing day to day spending just removes private sector surpluses - it doesn't make any sense in trying to recover the economy. Making such promises will make doing anything useful very difficult and provide an open goal to the Tories come 2029. This is the deficit shown as a % of GDP over the last 25 years, you can pretty much track declining public services with the deficit aside from the covid year.

View attachment 26768
Click to expand...

Sure. But if they get in and propose massive unfunded day to day spending then the markets will rightly or wrongly react badly. And everyone will go “I knew Labour were as bad as Truss” and that’ll be that.

Doesnt mean they can’t make a big difference, just that they won’t be able to spend what they could have two months ago.

Best case scenario (for party not country) is Sunak gets in and goes full Osbourne on austerity, meaning big changes can be made without having to go too mental the other way.
 
Reactions: Deleted member 5849, Sky_Blue_Dreamer, PVA and 1 other person
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • #23,256
shmmeee said:
I think what will do for Johnson is that under Sunak it’s the “red wall” seats they’re mostly likely to lose. Saw some research this morning showing it’s the more left economically voters that Johnson brought in who are deserting them.

A lot of Johnson’s power base was the 2019 intake that owed him their seats, outside of them it’s the headbanger rump. I think if there’s a landslide Labour victory, the seats that are left won’t produce MPs that would back Johnson. Could be wrong though, I’ve not don’t the hard yards looking at actual seats.
Click to expand...

I haven't seen recent polling but I imagine Johnson himself would be under big pressure in a Greater London constituency. Target it and chances are he'd be gone.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • #23,257
Brighton Sky Blue said:
I haven't seen recent polling but I imagine Johnson himself would be under big pressure in a Greater London constituency. Target it and chances are he'd be gone.
Click to expand...

That’s actually a very fair point under that scenario Johnson wouldn’t be an MP so his support is moot
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • #23,258
Seems to have gone down well-find some of the comments praising ‘Tory lite’ a bit vomit inducing but there we are

 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • #23,259
Greater Th
Brighton Sky Blue said:
I haven't seen recent polling but I imagine Johnson himself would be under big pressure in a Greater London constituency. Target it and chances are he'd be gone.
Click to expand...

He may fancy North Thanet next I believe
 
Reactions: Brighton Sky Blue

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • #23,260
shmmeee said:
Im saying radical economics may not go down well. I think the first term Labour are going to have to show they aren’t mental. They’re going to have to balance day to day spending, which was the issue with the tax cuts. So they’ll need to find extra revenue from somewhere if they don’t want austerity.
Click to expand...
I agree. If they went full-on it'd just lead to more chance of a Tory government getting back in much quicker.

I think during times of hardship and recession the better way out of that is investment by the state to create the jobs and demand rather than cutting spending. Ye, it would likely require borrowing but ultimately spending cuts do anyway as well as you end up with fewer jobs so less people paying in and more people taking out.
 
Reactions: duffer
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • #23,261
Grendel said:
Greater Th


He may fancy North Thanet next I believe
Click to expand...

I think he would fancy a lifetime of being paid 6 figure sums to stuff his face
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • #23,262
Brighton Sky Blue said:
I think he would fancy a lifetime of being paid 6 figure sums to stuff his face
Click to expand...

He’s commanding £150 grand for an hours speech - he will earn far more not being an MP than being one
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • #23,263
This is a good start for a super wealthy tax proposal: Millionaires call on governments worldwide to ‘tax us now’ | Davos | The Guardian

Would raise £43bn a year. Which is roughly what the size of the hole Truss opened up in the budget is I think.
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • #23,264
Grendel said:
He’s commanding £150 grand for an hours speech - he will earn far more not being an MP than being one
Click to expand...

Sums up the state of this country
 
Reactions: Sick Boy

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • #23,265
Isn’t it strange that Mordaunt is still struggling to get her numbers to grow despite their apparently now being 102 up for grabs. It’s almost as if Boris lied about having the exact number required before pulling out. You would have thought that the Boris cult would be piling on Mordaunt to make sure it goes to the membership where she’s likely to beat Sunak.
 
C

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • #23,266
skybluetony176 said:
Isn’t it strange that Mordaunt is still struggling to get her numbers to grow despite their apparently now being 102 up for grabs. It’s almost as if Boris lied about having the exact number required before pulling out. You would have thought that the Boris cult would be piling on Mordaunt to make sure it goes to the membership where she’s likely to beat Sunak.
Click to expand...

Maybe theres a few less loyal nutters than expected. Having said that, I’m sure I heard Dorries calling for a GE as Sunak hasn’t got a mandate. I presume in the hope that the Tories lose and this hastens the return of her hero….if she doesn’t lose her seat in the meantime

Any heard anything from Jacob ‘Borisorbust’ Rees Mogg ?
 
Reactions: Sick Boy, wingy and Sky Blue Pete

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • #23,267
CCFCSteve said:
Maybe theres a few less loyal nutters than expected. Having said that, I’m sure I heard Dorries calling for a GE as Sunak hasn’t got a mandate. I presume in the hope that the Tories lose and this hastens the return of her hero….if she doesn’t lose her seat in the meantime

Any heard anything from Jacob ‘Borisorbust’ Rees Mogg ?
Click to expand...
Only problem with that Boris isn’t looking likely to win his current seat so there’s a fair chance he won’t be in opposition. More importantly it works on the assumption that Boris would be willing to put the hard work in that’s required to be an opposition leader.
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • #23,268
Francois erg backbench group we haven't had time to come to a decision on who to endorse .
Yeah right.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • #23,269
CCFCSteve said:
Maybe theres a few less loyal nutters than expected. Having said that, I’m sure I heard Dorries calling for a GE as Sunak hasn’t got a mandate. I presume in the hope that the Tories lose and this hastens the return of her hero….if she doesn’t lose her seat in the meantime

Any heard anything from Jacob ‘Borisorbust’ Rees Mogg ?
Click to expand...
She's leaving the commons herself at the next election.
 
Reactions: CCFCSteve
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • #23,270
Be interesting for labour if the National insurance legislation was back in on.Monday.
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • #23,271
Mervyn King's comments picking up a bit of traction.
Tax increases for the minions.
There's not enough to get it from the rich.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • #23,272
wingy said:
Mervyn King's comments picking up a bit of traction.
Tax increases for the minions.
There's not enough to get it from the rich.
Click to expand...
He's probably right. I could get behind it as long as we used it to spend on the minions too... but I'm not holding out much hope for that. Looking forward to more 'efficiency savings'.
 
C

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • #23,273
Deleted member 5849 said:
She's leaving the commons herself at the next election.
Click to expand...

Dame Nadine ?
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • #23,274
CCFCSteve said:
Dame Nadine ?
Click to expand...
Aye. Wants to write more books
 
Reactions: Sick Boy

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • #23,275

 
Reactions: AOM, duffer and Sky Blue Pete
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 663
  • 664
  • 665
  • 666
  • 667
  • …
  • 1497
Next
First Prev 665 of 1497 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • chiefdave5 minutes ago
  • Ring Of Steel7 minutes ago
Total: 17 (members: 2, guests: 15)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?