D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
The scary thing is, in terms of competence he's as good as it gets, and in a contest of bland white men in suits, the electorate would go for the blue rosette.
The scary thing is, in terms of competence he's as good as it gets, and in a contest of bland white men in suits, the electorate would go for the blue rosette.I have grave misgivings about the country being run by a man who once forgot his wife's nationality.
What's he competent at?The scary thing is, in terms of competence he's as good as it gets, and in a contest of bland white men in suits, the electorate would go for the blue rosette.
The scary thing is, in terms of competence he's as good as it gets, and in a contest of bland white men in suits, the electorate would go for the blue rosette.
I always thought Javid, although hideously opposed to me ideologically, was somebody who at least had his head screwed on this side of insane.Him, Sunak and Tudgenhat seemly vaguely sane albeit useless, the rest are absolute mentalists.
What's he competent at?
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
I'd love to see some of these idiots go head to head with Starmer in the commons or in a debate.
Johnson could get away with his awful performances in PMQs because he's a 'bit of a character' or whatever.
These chancers like Braverman and Patel would get destroyed and it would be wonderful to watch them flounder.
In all seriousness it'd be interesting how it'd pay with 'normal' the other side. He's been doing the floor with Johnson recently (although my cat could do that!) and he dismantled the government through the Brexit debates.Id imagine they’d lose a lot of sleep coming across hard man Starmer at the dispatch box
Id imagine they’d lose a lot of sleep coming across hard man Starmer at the dispatch box
I'd love to see some of these idiots go head to head with Starmer in the commons or in a debate.
Johnson could get away with his awful performances in PMQs because he's a 'bit of a character' or whatever.
These chancers like Braverman and Patel would get destroyed and it would be wonderful to watch them flounder.
I don't think anyone has ever claimed him to be a 'hard man'.
But what he is is a very capable orator, and able to pick apart an opponent at will.
Idiots like Braverman would just embarrass themselves.
How could he argue with Braverman, she's only regurgitating the same reactionary shite Reeves came out with not long ago?
How could he argue with Braverman, she's only regurgitating the same reactionary shite Reeves came out with not long ago?
Shes not going to be the leader is she? That’s like saying IDS could beat dicky Burgon - it’s a senseless comparison
“a very capable orator” Christ he’s no Neil Kinnock is he
Don’t confuse him he’s having a good time
Funnily enough I think he'd do just fine against a right wing loon like Braverman. Regardless of what Reeve said.
Well take your pick. Truss, Patel, Sunak, Javid, Zawahi. He'd embarrass them all. That's the point, they're a fucking useless.
Hunt is about the only one who could look semi competent against him.
Genuine question, as much because I know you're quite passionate on animal rights. Would Jeremy Hunt's stance on fox hunting automatically stop you voting for the Conservatives if he became leader?
Shapps also terrible. Is this really the best our country's governing party has to offer? Really?
In a alternative universe and labour had 12 people standing would it be better - could you name 12?
This is all gaming to obtain votes amongst fringe contenders who then pass on to their actual choice - there are 4 serious contenders and one outside one. The others are standing for their puppet masters
I didn't think Javid was a fringe candidate to be honest. Why keep deflecting-it's an embarrassing start to what should be a serious discussion on fitness to lead
And he gets elected and Reeves implements policies that Braverman approves of - how is that improving the lot of the working man in this country?
We need an alternative not more of the same.
I get that Starmer is too centrist for you, and that's fine.
But you can't honestly think that the working man would be no better off under a Starmer government than a Braverman government.
Shapps also terrible. Is this really the best our country's governing party has to offer? Really?
It would have been better without Johnson's Brexit cull.
After that, this is what you're left with.
Quite funny actually
let’s be honest - if they still had Winston Churchill he’d be in the great orators pocket
It would have been better without Johnson's Brexit cull.
After that, this is what you're left with.
Quite funny actually
What on Earth are you on about?
I get that Starmer is too centrist for you, and that's fine.
But you can't honestly think that the working man would be no better off under a Starmer government than a Braverman government.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?