skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
So a family of four couldn’t order a takeout in lockdown?
So a family of four couldn’t order a takeout in lockdown?As Sir Beer didn’t recognise Red Ange at the party (sorry business meeting at 10 pm when indoor handling of take outs of more than two people was against COVID rules ) was she wearing a hat or had he had even more Sir Beers than you today?
So a family of four couldn’t order a takeout in lockdown?
I think travelling a few hundred miles when the country was in lockdown, was against the spirit of the rules.
Out of interest does anyone think Dominic Cummings commuted a crime by going to Barnard Castle?
“greeners” dear me the white lightening is going down well today
Almost as well as your sherry by the looks of it.
Haven't checked, a spad is much different than an elected representative.What was the Durham police response
He's had a knack of shifting with the winds too.Bunham is a conundrum to me.
He's about the perfect mix of left and centre and straight talking that you want to see now. I would likely vote for him.
But when he ran in 2015 he was about as bland estate agent suit politician as you can imagine.
Out of interest does anyone think Dominic Cummings commuted a crime by going to Barnard Castle?
Watching you and O'Day drunkenly go toe-to-toe on incoherent spellings all afternoon while both pretending to be sober/working is a true privyledge.
The reality is the public will now see Starmer as a liar whatever the actual outcome - mud sticks
It’s laughable to suggest a take out curry with 30 people isn’t a breach - the real damning for the Labour Party is the bizarre denial Rayner attended - a blatant lie which there is no backtrack from
Johnson can’t and doesn’t take the high ground of morality. Starmer claims to be morally superior - sadly as he decided to bring issues in such people not being able to visit loved ones in hospital the same applies to him. He sniggers laughs, drinks beer has a Keema Nan with his chums while peoples loved ones died alone
He can’t have it both ways and the curry stain lives longer with the political hypocrites - it’s going to be hard to wash off
The giddiness
The information we have so far shows there was no breach, hence no FPN. I don't know why this is difficult for you to understand.
If there is new information that shows he broke the law, then fine him. I don't think there will be, this is just pressure from the Tories and right wing press.
No giddiness but I’m sure you said Cummings was guilty didn’t you?
If you don’t think mud sticks fine but answer one question
Why did he lie Rayner wasn’t there?
I don’t pretend to understand the rules completely but it’s been confirmed that we were under tier 2 during beergate (unlike the downing st parties which happened in complete lockdown) and I think that limited meetings with friends and family to 6 not work colleagues at the office. You’re also seeming to be suggesting that Labour managed to make £250 worth of Indian takeaway stretch to 28 people which you can only draw two conclusions from. Either Kier is Jesus or Boris’ claim that Labour are inefficient when it comes to budgets is another Boris fact, otherwise known as a lie.I don’t think Sir Beer is shagging Red Ange and I don’t think the other 28 people are related Tony
it seems the investigation is to appease and shut up the tories
sorry greeners and that weird graph kid - no fine coming at all
he didn't and anyway only a dunce would think 2 people who work together being at what was already decided to be a work meal is killer new evidenceI don't think he ever said Rayner wasn't there. Or if he did I haven't seen it.
This.Obviously. It’s really not as complicated as Boris, the cabinet and the majority right wing press are trying to make out. Boris broke the law so he should resign, if Starmer is found to have broken the law he should resign.
why? he's not broken the law and I don't we should live a society where you have to worry about not breaking the lawEven if / when the investigation finds no law breaking, he's led himself right up the garden path.
I don’t pretend to understand the rules completely but it’s been confirmed that we were under tier 2 during beergate (unlike the downing st parties which happened in complete lockdown) and I think that limited meetings with friends and family to 6 not work colleagues at the office. You’re also seeming to be suggesting that Labour managed to make £250 worth of Indian takeaway stretch to 28 people which you can only draw two conclusions from. Either Kier is Jesus or Boris’ claim that Labour are inefficient when it comes to budgets is another Boris fact, otherwise known as a lie.
Either way if Starmer gets a FPN he has to resign his leadership, same as Boris should.
This.
Anyway, welcome an investigation as either he hasn't broken any laws, in which case Tories just prove their scum setting, or he has and he quits, and we see a difference in approach between what politicians should do, and what the man-child does.
The Capital | Restaurant in Durham
The Capital Restaurant is situated in the heart of historic Catherdral city of Durham. It offers a unique dining experience set in a grade II listed building inviting ambience combining English design with Indian visual themes.The restaurant presents a periodic evolving menu and a carefully...thecapitalindian.co.uk
here's the menu, no way does 200 quid cover 28 people
The reality is the public will now see Starmer as a liar whatever the actual outcome - mud sticks
It’s laughable to suggest a take out curry with 30 people isn’t a breach - the real damning for the Labour Party is the bizarre denial Rayner attended - a blatant lie which there is no backtrack from
Johnson can’t and doesn’t take the high ground of morality. Starmer claims to be morally superior - sadly as he decided to bring issues in such people not being able to visit loved ones in hospital the same applies to him. He sniggers laughs, drinks beer has a Keema Nan with his chums while peoples loved ones died alone
He can’t have it both ways and the curry stain lives longer with the political hypocrites - it’s going to be hard to wash off
Even if / when the investigation finds no law breaking, he's led himself right up the garden path.
Using social media as a tool , it would suggest that the public think the right wing media and right wing MPs are wasting police time to play political football
"Durham’s former police chief has condemned attempts to get his former force to investigate Keir Starmer over allegations of Covid rule-breaking as “hypocritical” and “dangerous” and said there is no evidence the Labour leader flouted the law."
I don’t think a former police commissioner should be making statements like that tbh
It's not the breaking the law as such it is the perceived equivalencewhy? he's not broken the law and I don't we should live a society where you have to worry about not breaking the law
Let’s be fair telling the truth isn’t high on the list of priorities for the Tory press.why? he's not broken the law and I don't we should live a society where you have to worry about not breaking the law
but what equivalence is there? noneIt's not the breaking the law as such it is the perceived equivalence
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?