Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
This isn’t really a gotcha if I agree the Lammy remarks are unacceptable
It’s hardly a new development and the protest group were the rag tag Piers Corbyn bunch weren’t they?
Also wasn’t David Lammy there? Lammy who said Tories are Nazis and that those who supported Brexit were worse than Adolf Hitler. Ever the balanced is Mr “great big expense account” Lammy
It’s been said for a while MPs need to tone it all down. Some of the language is unacceptable whether that’s Johnson with his slurs or Rayner with her ‘Tory scum’ and it only damages Parliament as a whole and whip up idiots in the public
Johnson shouldve just apologised and said he was referring to leaders taking responsibility for their teams actions but it was poor example and he retracts it (apparently it was Rees-Moggs suggestion - when’s Johnson going to stop listening to idiots ?!). Not hard
yes this is a good and balanced view but the notion Starmer was abused as Johnson made the comments is absurd and given his own disdain at the threats made to one of his own MPs I really don’t care about what the odious creep thinks anyway
Do you think Johnson should retract his slur?yes this is a good and balanced view but the notion Starmer was abused as Johnson made the comments is absurd and given his own disdain at the threats made to one of his own MPs I really don’t care about what the odious creep thinks anyway
Do you think Johnson should retract his slur?
So you don’t think he should retract it then?I think it was childish - I don’t see what it really achieved - but is it worse than accusations aimed at Tories as being Nazis - no - and it’s the works we live in. It’s a childish insult but it isn’t threatening Mr Starmer who refuses to back one of his own MPs against death threats
I think it was childish - I don’t see what it really achieved - but is it worse than accusations aimed at Tories as being Nazis - no - and it’s the works we live in. It’s a childish insult but it isn’t threatening Mr Starmer who refuses to back one of his own MPs against death threats
Did you not get upset and threaten Earlsdon with legal action for making derogatory, baseless comments about yourself. Don't really see how this is much different to that?I think it was childish - I don’t see what it really achieved - but is it worse than accusations aimed at Tories as being Nazis - no - and it’s the works we live in. It’s a childish insult but it isn’t threatening Mr Starmer who refuses to back one of his own MPs against death threats
So you don’t think he should retract it then?
Did you not get upset and threaten Earlsdon with legal action for making derogatory, baseless comments about yourself. Don't really see how this is much different to that?
Why is one contingent on the other?If Mr Lammy retracts his Nazi statement absolutely
Why is one contingent on the other?
If a tree falls in the night while a bear shits in the woods, is Tommy Robinson a racist?I think one is a lot worse than the other as was Mr Starmer and his casual indifference to one of his own MPs who received death threats - no?
If a tree falls in the night while a bear shits in the woods, is Tommy Robinson a racist?
AlwaysIf a tree falls in the night while a bear shits in the woods, is Tommy Robinson a racist?
Mr Grendel Goes To London
Real people don't care about No 10 lockdown parties, says Commons leader Mark Spencer
New Commons leader Mark Spencer insists the PM will not have lied about lockdown gatherings in No 10.www.bbc.co.uk
Please don't start it off here too!This should probably be on the coronovirus thread
Yes, I know. It was more about his decision making than the fact it was about the restrictions.Please don't start it off here too!
Still, you know what's going to happen now...!Yes, I know. It was more about his decision making than the fact it was about the restrictions.
Okay, I will delete it.Still, you know what's going to happen now...!
The reshuffle went well. He’s managed to replace awful people with the only people more awful than the ones he replaced.Real people all have one homogenous opinion and aren't capable of individual thought!
Condescending wank!
Mr Grendel Goes To London
Real people don't care about No 10 lockdown parties, says Commons leader Mark Spencer
New Commons leader Mark Spencer insists the PM will not have lied about lockdown gatherings in No 10.www.bbc.co.uk
Would be interesting to know what those people that got together during lockdown actually got fined for, seeing as the police don't police parties. Not to mention raids on raves or those that have had visits by the police to keep the noise down.First we had 'the police don't investigate historical crimes'.
Then we had 'we don't have any evidence despite all this fucking evidence right in front of us'
And now we have 'it's not the police's job to police'
Just what do the Met do exactly then?
So, if a murder was taking place in front of the gates of Downing Street the police on the gate couldn’t get involved? That’s basically what she’s saying.First we had 'the police don't investigate historical crimes'.
Then we had 'we don't have any evidence despite all this fucking evidence right in front of us'
And now we have 'it's not the police's job to police'
Just what do the Met do exactly then?
So, if a murder was taking place in front of the gates of Downing Street the police on the gate couldn’t get involved? That’s basically what she’s saying.
I do agree that she shouldn’t need to ask officers to police the corridors of Whitehall. However, that’s where we are. The police need police the corridors of Whitehall. She should be more angry about that than anyone given her position. Instead she’s trivialising upholding the law, which is a conflict of interest, which means she’s unfit for her position. She has to go.
I think the general point that if you’re there to guard you don’t get distracted by smaller crimes is fair.
I think the general point that if you’re there to guard you don’t get distracted by smaller crimes is fair.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?