Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Do you want to discuss boring politics? (21 Viewers)

  • Thread starter mrtrench
  • Start date Jun 14, 2020
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 283
  • 284
  • 285
  • 286
  • 287
  • …
  • 1497
Next
First Prev 285 of 1497 Next Last

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2022
  • #9,941
David O'Day said:
Mate he lives upstairs from Boris and is the actual resident of no,10 and is easy to taint.

He also wants to pay for his schemes which weren't his by plunging the UK back into austerity.
Click to expand...

I agree, but the point is not the truth but what the general public perceive.

Do you think the average person knows of his financial ideology and would reinstate austerity arguably harder than ever before? Or do they think he's a spender cos of furlough and EOTHO.

Do you think most people think about his living arrangements and what he can and can't see from his window?

Do you think they'd care about his priviliged upbringing giving him a nice job in the City before marrying into massive wealth, or just they'll see he's been successful and so therefore must know a thing or two about running the economy?

At least he'd actually put in the effort, unlike the current incumbent, but sadly if you're working from the wrong plan you can put in as much effort as you like - you're still going to end up in the shit.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2022
  • #9,942
skybluetony176 said:
There’s a rumour going around that she’s had elocution lessons to sound more like a pound shop Maggie.
Click to expand...

One has been in Beijing, opening up new porcine markets
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2022
  • #9,943
David O'Day said:
it's the only move they know how to make. They are now irretrievably in the public eye and the longer Johnson tries to tough it out the worst it will be for them.

Still no one cares about parties do they.

Also to answer some people yes the blatant corruption of the PPE contracts etc. should be what is bringing them done but people are detached from that. The reason this is what is sticking is people gave up so much and lost so much and now they can see the cunts who told them to do so were laughing at them.
Click to expand...

Go on David I’ll bet you £500 to charity Labour won’t be the majority party in parliament in the next election. Yes it’s a few years away but I’m sure an account can be set up where we can both stick the money in
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2022
  • #9,944
chiefdave said:
This Operation Red Meat thing in the Sunday Times has got to be a piss take.

Solve the cost of living crisis by freezing the BBC license fee and get the military to turn back immigrants & refugees in the channel. How stupid do they think voters are?
Click to expand...

Very.

We're the great unwashed and haven't been to public school or Oxbridge, so we're thick as fuck. Half of them are probably surprised we're intelligent enough to tie shoelaces and wonder why they bother putting words onto campaign posters cos we clearly aren't clever enough to be able to read.
 
Reactions: Grendel

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2022
  • #9,945
Sky_Blue_Dreamer said:
Very.

We're the great unwashed and haven't been to public school or Oxbridge, so we're thick as fuck. Half of them are probably surprised we're intelligent enough to tie shoelaces and wonder why they bother putting words onto campaign posters cos we clearly aren't clever enough to be able to read.
Click to expand...

So working class people who are voting Tory are thick as fuck and dogshit as they don’t do what you think

Wow your arrogance and inverse snobbery is amazing
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jan 16, 2022
  • #9,946
CCFCSteve said:
We were talking about current public perceptions
Click to expand...
Yeah, this is where he's ideally suited. Perception is he throws cash about, those who aren't ideologically keen on that will see his true state as fiscal competence.

Win / win.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2022
  • #9,947
Deleted member 5849 said:
Yeah, this is where he's ideally suited. Perception is he throws cash about, those who aren#t ideologically keen on that will see his true state as fiscal competence.

Win / win.
Click to expand...

Did you see Starmer this morning on the politics programme - do you think that was a Prime Minister in waiting?
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jan 16, 2022
  • #9,948
Grendel said:
Did you see Starmer this morning on the politics programme - do you think that was a Prime Minister in waiting?
Click to expand...
Did you have soldiers with your boiled eggs this morning?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2022
  • #9,949
Deleted member 5849 said:
Did you have soldiers with your boiled eggs this morning?
Click to expand...

No or I’d have chocked laughing

He’s literally an IDS figure useless. Actually I’ll say it you’d be better off with Rayner. Yes she’d need a lot of media training but she has something about her at least
 
Reactions: Jamesimus
C

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2022
  • #9,950
Sky_Blue_Dreamer said:
I agree entirely about how each system just ends up corrupted by the main parties and voting individuals leaves a very large possibility of some charismatic slef-serving charlatan taking over and running it like a dictator.

For me second chamber should be PR based on %votes for each party in the GE. Each party gets to choose which people represent them in the chamber. Like you say, not ideal but better than a house where each change of government just leads to an ever more bloated house as they give peerages to more people to give them control.
Click to expand...

I like the PR ideal for HoL, however, I’d want to cut the numbers.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jan 16, 2022
  • #9,951
CCFCSteve said:
I like the PR ideal for Lords. However I’d want to cut the numbers.
Click to expand...
PR for one chamber, FPTP for the other seems the best solution really, debate which way round it goes. Allows checks and balances, but keeps the direct representation a local MP supplies.
 
Reactions: Sky_Blue_Dreamer and CCFCSteve

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2022
  • #9,952
Grendel said:
So working class people who are voting Tory are thick as fuck and dogshit as they don’t do what you think

Wow your arrogance and inverse snobbery is amazing
Click to expand...

Nope. Not for not doing what I think. For carrying on believing that a bunch of people who treat them like second class citizens and who's ideology works against their best interests, all because they have a posh sounding voice and/or lots of money.
 
Reactions: Grendel

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2022
  • #9,953
CCFCSteve said:
I like the PR ideal for HoL, however, I’d want to cut the numbers.
Click to expand...

I agree about the numbers. Think there's over 1000 lords now.

Should be no more than the number of MP's in the Commons. Ideally less, but enough to accurately represent the result. Say 250-500
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2022
  • #9,954
Deleted member 5849 said:
PR for one chamber, FPTP for the other seems the best solution really, debate which way round it goes. Allows checks and balances, but keeps the direct representation a local MP supplies.
Click to expand...

If they're both elected, it kind of negates the upper/lower house argument. They should sit side by side.

FPTP is around constituents, so should probably focus on those issues while the PR house focuses on putting together national legislation etc. Then the FPTP house has to ratify it.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2022
  • #9,955
Sky_Blue_Dreamer said:
Nope. Not for not doing what I think. For carrying on believing that a bunch of people who treat them like second class citizens and who's ideology works against their best interests, all because they have a posh sounding voice and/or lots of money.
Click to expand...

So they are stupid for not seeing through it? Explain how say a car worker at JLR will personally be better off himself if Sir Starmer runs the country?
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2022
  • #9,956
Grendel said:
So they are stupid for not seeing through it? Explain how say a car worker at JLR will personally be better off himself if Sir Starmer runs the country?
Click to expand...
Well for a start, he's far less likely to cut corporation tax under some nonsense belief that it leads to job creation, resulting in a cut to services they use and/or an increase in their personal tax/NI/VAT to cover it.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2022
  • #9,957
Sky_Blue_Dreamer said:
Well for a start, he's far less likely to cut corporation tax under some nonsense belief that it leads to job creation, resulting in a cut to services they use and/or an increase in their personal tax/NI/VAT to cover it.
Click to expand...

How much has personal tax for average workers increased exactly?

Will it lower their mortgage costs, allow people to buy a better TV allow people to go on bigger and better holidays and improve the car they drive? Oddly most people couldn’t care less about corporation tax and oh name on labour government that’s created more jobs leaving office than when they took office.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2022
  • #9,958
Grendel said:
How much has personal tax for average workers increased exactly?

Will it lower their mortgage costs, allow people to buy a better TV allow people to go on bigger and better holidays and improve the car they drive? Oddly most people couldn’t care less about corporation tax and oh name on labour government that’s created more jobs leaving office than when they took office.
Click to expand...

Did you not spot the massive NI hike? It's a personal income tax that hides behind the facade of being a hypothecated tax for the NHS/Care Services but in reality just gets lumped into the pot.

As for lower mortgage costs, did you also not notice the interest rate rise before Christmas? As for buying bigger TV's/holidays price inflation running quite a bit above wage inflation is far from ideal isn't it?
 
Reactions: Grendel

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2022
  • #9,959
Grendel said:
So they are stupid for not seeing through it? Explain how say a car worker at JLR will personally be better off himself if Sir Starmer runs the country?
Click to expand...
A worker being better of under Labour is more tangible than being better of out of the EU.
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2022
  • #9,960
Trevor Phillips was very powerful this morning with Dowden.
Very emotional, on point around the distraction this is while several to ten other areas of concern sit in the long grass, and surprise suprise Sue Greys inquiry into party gate to run for a further ten days.
 

Jamesimus

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2022
  • #9,961
Grendel said:
Actually I’ll say it you’d be better off with Rayner. Yes she’d need a lot of media training but she has something about her at least
Click to expand...

I think I agree with this tbh
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
  • Jan 16, 2022
  • #9,962
Johnson seems to be going down the authoritarian route; he really is a disgrace.
 
Reactions: clint van damme

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2022
  • #9,963

no one cares about parties
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2022
  • #9,964
Sick Boy said:
Johnson seems to be going down the authoritarian route; he really is a disgrace.
Click to expand...
Leave Mr Johnson alone. He is an upstanding fellow.
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
  • Jan 16, 2022
  • #9,965
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
  • Jan 16, 2022
  • #9,966
The comments on the thread about how he “got Brexit done” are great too.
So much for the ‘oven ready’ deal
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2022
  • #9,967
Sick Boy said:
The comments on the thread about how he “got Brexit done” are great too.
So much for the ‘oven ready’ deal
Click to expand...

if those comments are true then everyone of the people who made them is a fucking moron. What the fuck did the expect his tenure was going to turn out like?
 
Reactions: Sky_Blue_Dreamer, Deleted member 5849 and Frostie
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2022
  • #9,968
Grendel said:
So they are stupid for not seeing through it? Explain how say a car worker at JLR will personally be better off himself if Sir Starmer runs the country?
Click to expand...

I mean by your own admission most voters don't care about policy, don't read the manifesto, and personalities are king.

So yeah that's a pretty stupid way to decide who should run the country in my book. Johnson was clearly picked as an affable clown because he seemed like someone they'd go down the pub with while Corbyn looked like a crusty geography teacher
 
Reactions: Sky_Blue_Dreamer and Frostie

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2022
  • #9,969
Sick Boy said:
Johnson seems to be going down the authoritarian route; he really is a disgrace.
Click to expand...
Don't get sucked in, it isn't Johnson. It's the Conservative party.
 
Reactions: Deleted member 5849 and Brighton Sky Blue
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 17, 2022
  • #9,970
I see the gigafactory at Bagington has finally been approved .
Around 10000 jobs including tertiary suppliers for the local region.
 
Reactions: CCFCSteve, clint van damme and Otis

Philosoraptor

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 17, 2022
  • #9,971
wingy said:
I see the gigafactory at Bagington has finally been approved .
Around 10000 jobs including tertiary suppliers for the local region.
Click to expand...

That would be a good place for an airport.
 
Reactions: Terry Gibson's perm and chiefdave
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jan 17, 2022
  • #9,972
wingy said:
I see the gigafactory at Bagington has finally been approved .
Around 10000 jobs including tertiary suppliers for the local region.
Click to expand...
From a practical POV, just as Tollbar gets freed up, won't it all end up a bottleneck again?
 
Reactions: wingy

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 17, 2022
  • #9,973
wingy said:
I see the gigafactory at Bagington has finally been approved .
Around 10000 jobs including tertiary suppliers for the local region.
Click to expand...
If you believe there will be 10K jobs you'll believe anything. They can't get anyone interested in operating the gigafactory and the council refused requests to make the granting of planning permission conditional on someone being found to operate it.
 
P

PVA

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 17, 2022
  • #9,974
Zawahi doing the rounds this morning going hard with the 'Johnson thought it was a work event' line.

And as ever with this scandal, he does it as reports come out that Johnson was warned it was a social event and not to go ahead with it, but ignored the warnings.

I know they're too far in now so it's too late, but why oh why do they keep lying about stuff when they know there are more details to come out, details than can prove them wrong?
 
Reactions: CCFCSteve

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 17, 2022
  • #9,975
clint van damme said:
if those comments are true then everyone of the people who made them is a fucking moron. What the fuck did the expect his tenure was going to turn out like?
Click to expand...

Makes you angry reading some of those. They're surprised that Johnson has done exactly the same things he's been doing his whole life. If some of those people genuinely thought the things they did about him at election time then it shows just how little attention and research people put into casting a vote. I bet they put more thought into who they vote for on Strictly.
 
Reactions: Terry Gibson's perm, Frostie and oakey
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 283
  • 284
  • 285
  • 286
  • 287
  • …
  • 1497
Next
First Prev 285 of 1497 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 17 (members: 0, guests: 17)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?