Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Actually that applies in the other direction. You believe in conspiracy theories, that’s a fact, not an ad hominem. BBC not reporting them isn’t ‘misrepresentation’.
Actually that applies in the other direction. You believe in conspiracy theories, that’s a fact, not an ad hominem. BBC not reporting them isn’t ‘misrepresentation’.Pathetic ad hominem attacks is your level.
So if I have this right - your argument here is that the BBC is firmly on the side of misrepresentation, but forces out any senior executives who are seen to be actually doing it?Because they got caught doing it.
He’s a lot of things but I really wouldn’t go that far mate.Johnson is a despicable murderer
The NI increase was an economically illiterate policy. People may have missed this, but Reform floated that policy for foreign workers and this was right (imo) derided as a dumb policy.And no serious attempt to address underlying causes of inflation imo, I think the minimum wage should be increased but it shouldn't be the sole means to improve disposable income. The employer NI rise has just led to further price rises anyway.
Corporate manslaughter thenHe’s a lot of things but I really wouldn’t go that far mate.
His line of ‘let the bodies pile high’ still makes me angry to be fair. I don’t care what the circumstances are, no Prime Minister of this country should be saying that and allowed to stay in the job.Corporate manslaughter then
And he jumps on the daily mail and drives a wedge at the judge
It’s only a clowny japeHis line of ‘let the bodies pile high’ still makes me angry to be fair. I don’t care what the circumstances are, no Prime Minister of this country should be saying that and allowed to stay in the job.
Yes they may have been but the previous chancellor made that equation when he knew he was leaving office,so where should she have got it back from?The NI increase was an economically illiterate policy. People may have missed this, but Reform floated that policy for foreign workers and this was right (imo) derided as a dumb policy.
So what did this government do? Apply it to the whole workforce. Reeves has been a disaster and the fact she’s now playing the victim card based on her gender shows desperation. She’s been toast since crying in Parliament.
Less and less people want to pay for the BBC. I haven't had a TV licence for about 10 years now, I don't watch it or any broadcast TV.So if I have this right - your argument here is that the BBC is firmly on the side of misrepresentation, but forces out any senior executives who are seen to be actually doing it?
No.So if I have this right - your argument here is that the BBC is firmly on the side of misrepresentation, but forces out any senior executives who are seen to be actually doing it?
Nope..For me I'm not sure, I mean he's an absolute nutter so I don't think an edit was out of place, it emerged yesterday from somewhere that he may have actually suggested using violence somewhere else in his speech or somebody's interpretation of it.
Also never knew you could not pay it as it's for any device that is capable of receiving?
As an example can't imagine there's many people on here who never listen to the CWR commentary. Think there's an under appreciation of just how much the BBC covers. Could very well end up being a case of don't know what you've got till it's gone.Less and less people want to pay for the BBC. I haven't had a TV licence for about 10 years now, I don't watch it or any broadcast TV.
Embattled BBC loses over £1billion as record number refuse to pay licence fee
THE embattled BBC lost more than £1billion last year after a record number of families refused to pay the licence fee. Around 3.6million households simply said they did not want to use the corporat…www.thesun.co.uk
TV licence fee to rise above £180 a year
THE cost of a TV licence is set to rise to more than £180 next year in a blow to millions of households. High inflation means the fee to watch live TV is expected to rise by almost £7 in the spring…www.thesun.co.uk
It's not hard, alternatives will come into being to fill any void.As an example can't imagine there's many people on here who never listen to the CWR commentary. Think there's an under appreciation of just how much the BBC covers. Could very well end up being a case of don't know what you've got till it's gone.
I mean we know that's not true. Look at the likes of the CET, look at what's happened to local independent radio.It's not hard, alternatives will come into being to fill any void.
It is very easy with today's technology to provide an inexpensive service.
I mean we know that's not true. Look at the likes of the CET, look at what's happened to local independent radio.
What side is that?
Yes. Nobody's actually answered it so far, perhaps you can?Really?
Yes. Nobody's actually answered it so far, perhaps you can?
Notoriously left leaning, as evidenced how? Trump's speech was designed to incite violence on the Capitol, which is what happened.The "impartial" BBC are notoriously left leaning.
The fact they've had to splice together a video to make Trump appear that he's called for an attack on the Capitol, proves that. Why would they do that randomly?
More to the point, why has it taken so long to surface?
Probably so, but that's a generalised viewpoint on the housing side I think Steve,the builders all of were not exactly with the Govt from Day 1, they were mocking Raynor's comments basically, feet in the mud approach,at least that's my impression?To add to the £100m bat tunnel for HS2, the £300m lower Thames Crossing planning costs and the fact that due to obstructive planning committees we had least number of houses built in a decade in ye March 25
View attachment 47350
This country is bogged down in so much bollocks that just isnt compatible with a one that’s swimming in debt with negligible growth.
Probably so, but that's a generalised viewpoint on the housing side I think Steve,the builders all of were not exactly with the Govt from Day 1, they were mocking Raynor's comments basically, feet in the mud approach,at least that's my impression?
It's not hard, alternatives will come into being to fill any void.
It is very easy with today's technology to provide an inexpensive service.
I think your imagination needs recharging.
The evasiveness suggests to me there may be more to come on this story
He was a c**t
The evasiveness suggests to me there may be more to come on this story
It's a non story! 50 years ago things were said that wouldn't be acceptable now and rightly so. 50 years ago the population were served up programs like Death till us do part, Love thy neighbour, Rinsing damp, Mind your language and other programs full of racism or humiliating peoples differences, so hardly surprising kids on the school playground could be seen marching in animated fashion giving the Nazi salute and to mock other classmates for any differences and that could be for being tall or short, fat or thin, wearing of glasses and unfortunately colour of skin.
The evasiveness suggests to me there may be more to come on this story
nothing article, boys will be boys! xx
The evasiveness suggests to me there may be more to come on this story
Farage doesn't think it is defensible on the basis of societal norms by the sound of the interviewIt's a non story! 50 years ago things were said that wouldn't be acceptable now and rightly so. 50 years ago the population were served up programs like Death till us do part, Love thy neighbour, Rinsing damp, Mind your language and other programs full of racism or humiliating peoples differences, so hardly surprising kids on the school playground could be seen marching in animated fashion giving the Nazi salute and to mock other classmates for any differences and that could be for being tall or short, fat or thin, wearing of glasses and unfortunately colour of skin.
It was a very different world then so we shouldn't be judged on todays expectations with the morals of fifty years ago.
He wasn't saying it was 50 years ok so it is ok, I said it was because he couldn't rememberNot defending any racist abuse nor it being right, but he has a point it's nearly 50 years ago different era, generation. Times were much different back then.
It's a non story! 50 years ago things were said that wouldn't be acceptable now and rightly so. 50 years ago the population were served up programs like Death till us do part, Love thy neighbour, Rinsing damp, Mind your language and other programs full of racism or humiliating peoples differences, so hardly surprising kids on the school playground could be seen marching in animated fashion giving the Nazi salute and to mock other classmates for any differences and that could be for being tall or short, fat or thin, wearing of glasses and unfortunately colour of skin.
It was a very different world then so we shouldn't be judged on todays expectations with the morals of fifty years ago.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?