“I ask myself who is paying and who ultimately benefits” - the answer is Netflix, isn’t it?
“I ask myself who is paying and who ultimately benefits” - the answer is Netflix, isn’t it?Good grief why do you always misunderstand? It's not coming from Netflix, haven't you noticed Starmer has latched on to it, Downing St even invited Graham and Thorne in to talk about it.
AwfulDan Norris MP
View attachment 42370
The probably will when enough times elapsed for the parents if there is even such a thing.Like I said, it's a drama about a white middle class family. It's safe for them to pull their cocks off about.
Dramatise the Southport murders and he will be in hiding.
“I ask myself who is paying and who ultimately benefits” - the answer is Netflix, isn’t it?
I might have fallen asleep TBFDid you miss episode three? He did believe it.
Bandwagon jumping on.Is that a big priority for Netflix? For Jack Thorne and Stephen Graham? Just trying to understand where this “massive propaganda campaign” is coming from.
Pathetic response from Starmer
UK to relax electric car sale rules as Donald Trump's tariffs hit
The prime minister says measures will help the car industry but critics claim they are not enough.www.bbc.co.uk
Firstly it's not a response to Trump:
'A consultation on the government's EV target changes ended in mid-February'
And secondly the changes are minor tweaks.
Obviously you find it pathetic, but I think most would say it's fairly sensible and not worth crying about.
The notion of continuing with the nonsense of fining uk manufacturers for not achieving impossible targets is pathetic and oddly the industry definitely think it’s something worth crying about
Oh. Your issue isn't that the policy has been relaxed, your issue is that it should have been relaxed further?
The cars are going to be for the rich and business providers anyway,get on with it,mass transit and don't dare equate trip on one person in a car to be competitive.Starmer should leave the car industry to it and focus on providing net zero public transport. Why we've still got diesel trains running all over the country 140 years after the first electrified railway god only knows.
I've always been deeply suspicious of anything attached to a massive propaganda campaign, I ask myself who is paying for it and who ultimately benefits. The focus seems to be on restricting social media for minors, that is what the main writer Jack Thorne has said and Australia has already legislated in that area. The new age of censorship is upon us.
Australian social media ban on under-16s approved by parliament
The ban aims to reduce "harms" on children and will take at least a year to implement, the PM says.www.bbc.co.uk
We've always censored things based on age ratings, generally for the protection of children. Are you against that?
I've always been deeply suspicious of anything attached to a massive propaganda campaign, I ask myself who is paying for it and who ultimately benefits.
They really don't help themselves.
Labour drops plans for rape gang inquiries
Government says it will adopt ‘flexible approach’ with other options open to councils including local panels and auditswww.telegraph.co.uk
Once again, if you actually read the details it's nothing like the headline would have you believe.
'LABOUR DROPS RAPE GANG INQUIRIES!!!'
No, Labour is providing the exact same funding but is making it available for local authorities to use how they see fit for their particular cases.
There's plenty to knock them for without resorting to this
They have completely pussied out of doing the bare minimum.
It is pathetic, as is your simping for such a government full of twats.
Read it again and come back to me.
The fact that as far as I can see only the Telegraph, Express and GBeebies seems to be reporting it says it all.
And see if you can do it without calling me a cuck.
It don't really work like that .With the latest gold price, it means Gordon Brown lost the UK over £30 billion pounds.
How very prudent he was.
You can only see them reporting as probably the left wing media won't, as like you and the government, they shit their pants when it comes to tackling these issues.
I have read it. It's a complete joke. It was the weakest form of investigation in the first place, but they don't even have the balls to go through with it, and have instead opted for 'local authorities', which was more or less the criticism in the first place.
Anyone sticking up for this is a grooming gangs apologist, or an idiot. I hope you are the latter.
So if they sold off the water company' gas BT postal service rail and all the social housing how much has that cost us ?It don't really work like that .
Yeah I'm clearly a grooming gang apologist, I can see how you've drawn that conclusion
You're quite happy to 'simp' for a serial sexual abuser and guy that hangs around with paedos so maybe get off your high horse if that's the game you want to play.
Pathetic.
So it's OK for you to do it, but when someone else does it it's 'pathetic'.
You're an absolute parody of yourself.
I haven't done anything, so stop trying to deflect onto me to protect yourself.
You are here sticking up for this useless government, and are quite happy to watch the grooming gangs scandal continue with no effort to stop it or investigate it. That is what is pathetic.
Don't come at me on morals either. You have quite happily abandoned them in favour of simping for your political party of choice. Frankly, you've got no balls.
If you don't support a national enquiry on grooming gangs then it says everything about you.
Where have I said I don't support an inquiry into grooming gangs?
All you're doing is continuing to prove that you're really fucking good at reading things that aren't there and getting angry about those made up things.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?