Find the Asda version, absolutely fine but the space on the shelves is tiny compared to the Heinz stuff, same with porridge etc since the change of ownership and possibly since the change from fine fayre who I think Asda derived from but not certain, they certainly don't seem like the shoppers friend.Lidl baked beans are ok and a lot cheaper than Heinz.
I think fine fare were taken over in the 1980’s and a lot of their shops rebranded as Gateway who were then taken over by Asda.Find the Asda version, absolutely fine but the space on the shelves is tiny compared to the Heinz stuff, same with porridge etc since the change of ownership and possibly since the change from fine fayre who I think Asda derived from but not certain, they certainly don't seem like the shoppers friend.
Thank goodness for AIIt's rich people who tend to benefit, not people shopping at Aldi for low cost beans.
View attachment 42227
What a fantastically competent government we must have.More depressing news today. Child poverty figures up to a record high of 4.45 million, DWP also predicting yesterdays changes will push a further 50,000 children into poverty.
Would you vote green or Lib Dem now?What a fantastically competent government we must have.
It’s alright, Darren Jones and Rachel Reeves said they can just pop out and get a Saturday job.More depressing news today. Child poverty figures up to a record high of 4.45 million, DWP also predicting yesterdays changes will push a further 50,000 children into poverty.
Lib Dem or green? Got to be up there with the worst choices of all time. Both are absolutely uselessWould you vote green or Lib Dem now?
Thank goodness for AI
So lots of paper benefits then, not all tangible ones. Hardly makes inflation effectively a tax.
Inflation will lead to increased tax revenues for, for example, VAT returns on higher prices. Inflation is not a tax in itself.
Tbf I don't think we'll ever know but unless we get proportional representation (which the main two will never agree to as it serves them so well) then we'll never know. I'd say pointless more than useless. Reform might be polar opposite, but they are similar.Lib Dem or green? Got to be up there with the worst choices of all time. Both are absolutely useless
I think fine fare were taken over in the 1980’s and a lot of their shops rebranded as Gateway who were then taken over by Asda.Find the Asda version, absolutely fine but the space on the shelves is tiny compared to the Heinz stuff, same with porridge etc since the change of ownership and possibly since the change from fine fayre who I think Asda derived from but not certain, they certainly don't seem like the shoppers friend.
Well I think that's about as good an endorsement as you can get!Lib Dem or green? Got to be up there with the worst choices of all time. Both are absolutely useless
And then you log off sbt and step into the real worldWell I think that's about as good an endorsement as you can get!
Well I think that's about as good an endorsement as you can get!
I am not 100% sure but I think it involves bungee jumping and zumba dancing.Has anyone ever voted Lib Dem with any understanding or commitment to their ideology? Do they have one?
Ahhh yes the ever reliable AI Overviews.It's rich people who tend to benefit, not people shopping at Aldi for low cost beans.
View attachment 42227
So, this went well then...
I don't know what that tells us, other than that having drugs sold illegally leads to sh*t like this. If the bloke was released a month later would he have been less likely to do what he did?
Without the benefit of hindsight who would you have preferred to let out? I'm sure nobody would advocate for releasing people convicted of serious crimes to free up space so you're left with people like this who were inside for having a punch up.I think it tells us that there were people let out of prison that shouldn't be walking the streets, and the decision to realease some of them was the wrong decision. Further proof really that the justice system is fucked, the government is clueless, and that we have a lot of wronguns around.
Without the benefit of hindsight who would you have preferred to let out? I'm sure nobody would advocate for releasing people convicted of serious crimes to free up space so you're left with people like this who were inside for having a punch up.
Its not Minority Report where they know what offences are taking place in advance. Unless people think reoffending rates are zero what's the solution, keep everyone inside forever?
How was he released my starmer?So, this went well then...
How was he released my starmer?
I am no fan of Starmer, but not having enough physical space in prisons months after taking office was not his doing. My own preference would be reduced sentences or fines for non violent offenders and longer sentences for violent criminals.I think it tells us that there were people let out of prison that shouldn't be walking the streets, and the decision to realease some of them was the wrong decision. Further proof really that the justice system is fucked, the government is clueless, and that we have a lot of wronguns around.
Will give you credit for making me have to do a double take... The drug argument is one thing that I don't necessarily disagree with you about, but I think you have missed the point entirely on this.
Let’s just confirm then it was a prison and probation and parole decision as there isn’t enough space in the prison estateParagraph one in the article:
"A prisoner who was freed as part of Sir Keir Starmer’s controversial prison scheme killed someone on the same day he was released."
Will give you credit for making me have to do a double take... The drug argument is one thing that I don't necessarily disagree with you about, but I think you have missed the point entirely on this.
I'm not arguing its good or bad.You're not seriously trying to argue that this was a good decision are you?
Someone let out literally killed someone the same day, which is surely evidence enough that they shouldn't have been on the streets.
Minority Report is some serious mental gymnastics. Come on ffs.
Not disputing the numbers, but this means that 30% live in poverty. Seems pretty high to me unless poverty means not having an iphone or a Play Station.More depressing news today. Child poverty figures up to a record high of 4.45 million, DWP also predicting yesterdays changes will push a further 50,000 children into poverty.
Not disputing the numbers, but this means that 30% live in poverty. Seems pretty high to me unless poverty means not having an iphone or a Play Station.
Fair point. I just don't know what the term "poverty" really means these days.Smart phones are hardly a luxury item in this day and age. You can't have a government on the one hand committed to digitising public services on the other claiming devices that are used to access them are luxury items.
Couple of our clients at work employ hundreds of minimum wage, zero hours contract staff. They're all required to have smart phones to access work related things and the company will not provide them. Stuff like apps that show work rotas, authentication apps for logging on to work systems etc.Smart phones are hardly a luxury item in this day and age. You can't have a government on the one hand committed to digitising public services on the other claiming devices that are used to access them are luxury items.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?