MalcSB
Well-Known Member
Their GP contract wasn’t all that helpful either, not requiring out of hours cover. Never mind though, Labour were competent - it’s just silly of us to be sick out of office hours.
Their GP contract wasn’t all that helpful either, not requiring out of hours cover. Never mind though, Labour were competent - it’s just silly of us to be sick out of office hours.Blair and the Labour Party destroyed NHS dentistry
Seen a lot of polls/surveys, presumably commissioned by him, asking what one would think of him as Tory leader. He is very clearly using this election as a tilt for the Tory leadership.The prospect of him as Tory leader at the next election is a frightening prospect. They’ve already managed to get the ‘MSM’ narrative going in the UK like in the USA and he’s already like Trump to an extent where his base don’t care what he does or says.
Agree 100%. The emergence of Reform means the party is only going to move further to the right.Seen a lot of polls/surveys, presumably commissioned by him, asking what one would think of him as Tory leader. He is very clearly using this election as a tilt for the Tory leadership.
It’s alarming that there is nobody charismatic or principled enough to oppose him.
I don't really get the thing of picking out things Labour did wrong years ago and using that as evidence they should never be in power again but not applying the same logic to the current government who fuck up massively on a weekly basis.Their GP contract wasn’t all that helpful either, not requiring out of hours cover. Never mind though, Labour were competent - it’s just silly of us to be sick out of office hours.
What is getting me are the claims on here that Labour will be competent when there is no evidence to support that. People will then point to the last Labour government, ignoring things like dodgy dossiers, sale of gold reserves, ruination of private pensions, foreign military adventures. Those people will “pick out things” they dId right from years agoas evidence they would succeed when in power again.I don't really get the thing of picking out things Labour did wrong years ago and using that as evidence they should never be in power again but not applying the same logic to the current government who fuck up massively on a weekly basis.
Let's be realistic, nobody else is going to win an election anytime soon so if you're dead against Labour you're happily accepting more of the shitshow we've got at the moment.
Boris meets half that requirement. Starmer obviously meets neither.Seen a lot of polls/surveys, presumably commissioned by him, asking what one would think of him as Tory leader. He is very clearly using this election as a tilt for the Tory leadership.
It’s alarming that there is nobody charismatic or principled enough to oppose him.
Correct, but Boris is just as big a con artist as Farage who declared he would be happy to ‘let the bodies pile high’.Boris meets half that requirement. Starmer obviously meets neither.
|
I'd want my daughter to be pushed to her full potential and get the best she possibly could.
Surely people paying thousands more to live in a certain area for a school aren't much different? After all it's a luxury to live in Finham as opposed to Wood End (for example).
I'm pretty sure the school you worked in would have been an eye opener, I know when I worked in a school it was an eye opener. (This was before it was all academies and watched the council spend shit loads of unneeded money every week that could have gone to teachers).
Boris meets half that requirement. Starmer obviously meets neither.
Very fearful of waking up to farage on July 5thStarmer beats every other leader including Farage in a head to head who would be best PM poll.
But don’t let facts get in the way or anything.
Who would win in a debate?Starmer beats every other leader including Farage in a head to head who would be best PM poll.
But don’t let facts get in the way or anything.
Who would win in a debate?
Very fearful of waking up to farage on July 5th
People have gone mad
Because dismantling the robotic Starmer on the TV would put something of a dent in those polls and public perception.Who would win in a game of one goal Wembley?
What is it with you continually valuing random metrics for politicians over actually winning elections?
Because dismantling the robotic Starmer on the TV would put something of a dent in those polls and public perception.
That’s a record of peoples opinions, not facts.Starmer beats every other leader including Farage in a head to head who would be best PM poll.
But don’t let facts get in the way or anything.
I did say Boris would meet half your requirement.Correct, but Boris is just as big a con artist as Farage who declared he would be happy to ‘let the bodies pile high’.
That’s a record of peoples opinions, not facts.
Have there been any polls of him v Boris.
Starmer has zero charisma and his flip flopping, including recent comments about Corbyn, show he isn’t principled.
Isn’t there every chance of the nice kids getting dragged down and / or bullied by the challenging kids?Yeah until the end of my career I worked exclusively in challenging schools. They need money and nice kids and adding both money and nice kids into the system won’t be a burden.
It is the same as being in a nice area to an extent, but no one is hiring you later in life purely because you went to Finham Park. It’s the social advantages you pay for in private as I said not the quality of the school.
Isn’t there every chance of the nice kids getting dragged down and / or bullied by the challenging kids?
Seen a lot of polls/surveys, presumably commissioned by him, asking what one would think of him as Tory leader. He is very clearly using this election as a tilt for the Tory leadership.
It’s alarming that there is nobody charismatic or principled enough to oppose him.
Ther it is again, suggestion Labour will be competent when there is no evidence to support that. We have no idea of the state the country would be in if Labour had been in power for the past 5 years.And for you that’s a big deal. But not for most people who just want someone competent who isn’t going to financially ruin the country.
This is like saying Corbyn should come back cos he got big rallies: a complete misunderstanding of the difference between protest parties and parties of govt.
Your last sentence is very true.It depends but all things being equal adding friends to the existing nice kids is more likely to make them more bully proof IMO.
Schools for me are about critical mass in the cohort and in reality if you’re rich enough to send your kids private you can move to an area with nice kids.
Kids who go private when their parents aren’t as rich as others are very likely to be bullied as well of course.
But we do have evidence Farage is?Ther it is again, suggestion Labour will be competent when there is no evidence to support that. We have no idea of the state the country would be in if Labour had been in power for the past 5 years.
He would, but he’s of the same ilkI did say Boris would meet half your requirement.
In a parliament where the bar is set so low that you've got the likes of Rayner, Lammy and Thornberry on the Government front bench, Farage is fully entitled to be a candidate for leadership.
It won’t happen this election with Reform; there’s more potential if the takes over the Tories. The country sleepwalked into Brexit and it could easily do the same.Very fearful of waking up to farage on July 5th
People have gone mad
It's not like the Tories have had 14 years to put all these things right, is it? What's your excuse for that?Their GP contract wasn’t all that helpful either, not requiring out of hours cover. Never mind though, Labour were competent - it’s just silly of us to be sick out of office hours.
Spot on. Corbyn was a shit leader. He appealed to a relatively small section of voters and Labour members but was unelectable. The polling in 2019 highlighted that perfectly. Labour under Corbyn was a protest party with no hope of governing. I still voted Labour and always will, but fuck was I tired of his sheer ineptness. Corbyn is suited to standing in Trafalgar Square with a megaphone, not sitting behind a desk in Number Ten. People used to point at the amount of people who turned up at his rally's as proof he was a great man. He wasn't.No one cares about the debates man, more people watched Springwatch.
Someone who appeals to 30% of the population and turns off the other 70% isn’t an election winner. Rallies and online trolls are not a measure of electability. As Labour found out.
Haha. I'll counter you with Gullis, Lee Anderson, Braverman, Johnson. Fuck.In a parliament where the bar is set so low that you've got the likes of Rayner, Lammy and Thornberry on the Government front bench, Farage is fully entitled to be a candidate for leadership.
It's not like the Tories have had 14 years to put all these things right, is it? What's your excuse for that?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?