Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Do you want to discuss boring politics? (39 Viewers)

  • Thread starter mrtrench
  • Start date Jun 14, 2020
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 1071
  • 1072
  • 1073
  • 1074
  • 1075
  • …
  • 1495
Next
First Prev 1073 of 1495 Next Last

Philosoraptor

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 11, 2024
  • #37,521

Unite union refuses to endorse Labour's election manifesto

Labour's biggest trade union backer is concerned workers' rights policies do not go far enough.
www.bbc.co.uk
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 11, 2024
  • #37,522
What a business genius

 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 11, 2024
  • #37,523
The press have really turned on the tories it’s great to see, I loved the one where the guy from Sky was giving it to Holden and his little muppet jumped in and got put in his place as well.
 

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 11, 2024
  • #37,524
Terry Gibson's perm said:
The press have really turned on the tories it’s great to see, I loved the one where the guy from Sky was giving it to Holden and his little muppet jumped in and got put in his place as well.
Click to expand...
It's not great to see. The press shouldn't decide who they want in government, they should be there to report objectively and allow the public to inform themselves of the options.
 
Reactions: MalcSB, fernandopartridge and RegTheDonk
P

PVA

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 11, 2024
  • #37,525
Liquid Gold said:
It's not great to see. The press shouldn't decide who they want in government, they should be there to report objectively and allow the public to inform themselves of the options.
Click to expand...

I think what he means is that the press have finally started holding the Tories to account and have started pushing back on their shite and lies rather than just accepting it. As they should. Even if it's 14 years too late!
 
Reactions: skybluetony176 and oakey

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 11, 2024
  • #37,526
As soon as Starmer said this knew it would be all over socials. How are they all so bad at this stuff. I guess at least Davey looks like he's enjoying himself!

 
Reactions: dutchman, Mucca Mad Boys and Grendel

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 11, 2024
  • #37,527
PVA said:
I think what he means is that the press have finally started holding the Tories to account and have started pushing back on their shite and lies rather than just accepting it. As they should. Even if it's 14 years too late!
Click to expand...
I think them holding that much power is dangerous. It's not that it's better late than never it's scary how they will decide what's best for them and go for it. If Starmer was any danger to the status quo he would be getting all the flak with Super Sunak walking it.

It's dodgy as fuck and one of the industries that needs major reform and regulation.
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 11, 2024
  • #37,528
Liquid Gold said:
It's not great to see. The press shouldn't decide who they want in government, they should be there to report objectively and allow the public to inform themselves of the options.
Click to expand...

It’s great to see they have stopped accepting the bollocks now is more what I was trying to say they are being held accountable and they really don’t like it.
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 11, 2024
  • #37,529
Liquid Gold said:
I think them holding that much power is dangerous. It's not that it's better late than never it's scary how they will decide what's best for them and go for it. If Starmer was any danger to the status quo he would be getting all the flak with Super Sunak walking it.

It's dodgy as fuck and one of the industries that needs major reform and regulation.
Click to expand...

The problem with more regulation is it will be set by government and they have seen to be more than incapable.
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 11, 2024
  • #37,530
chiefdave said:
As soon as Starmer said this knew it would be all over socials. How are they all so bad at this stuff. I guess at least Davey looks like he's enjoying himself!

Click to expand...
He’s such a twat.
 
Reactions: lordsummerisle and Brighton Sky Blue

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 11, 2024
  • #37,531
Liquid Gold said:
I think them holding that much power is dangerous. It's not that it's better late than never it's scary how they will decide what's best for them and go for it. If Starmer was any danger to the status quo he would be getting all the flak with Super Sunak walking it.

It's dodgy as fuck and one of the industries that needs major reform and regulation.
Click to expand...

Do they hold that much power in 2024?
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jun 11, 2024
  • #37,532
shmmeee said:
Do they hold that much power in 2024?
Click to expand...
They never did. The Sun said vote Tory, the majority of their readership voted Labour when nobody else was. Of more concern is the access to dubious 'information' across the internet to confirm deep held feelings and impressions even if rooted in gibbering bollocks.
 
Reactions: Skybluekyle and Sky Blue Pete

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 11, 2024
  • #37,533
Deleted member 5849 said:
They never did. The Sun said vote Tory, the majority of their readership voted Labour when nobody else was. Of more concern is the access to dubious 'information' across the internet to confirm deep held feelings and impressions even if rooted in gibbering bollocks.
Click to expand...

Yeah. Social media has fucked elections. I do wonder how it would have impacted historic elections.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete
S

Skybluekyle

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 11, 2024
  • #37,534
shmmeee said:
Yeah. Social media has fucked elections. I do wonder how it would have impacted historic elections.
Click to expand...
I am a soft Eurosceptic, and voted, just about, "Leave" in the EU Referendum, but I can say with a large degree of certainty, Russian interference through social media had a sizable impact on the vote. Social media is easily the biggest influencer on the electorate.
 
Reactions: Earlsdon_Skyblue1
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 11, 2024
  • #37,535
shmmeee said:
Yeah. Social media has fucked elections. I do wonder how it would have impacted historic elections.
Click to expand...
Compare PMQs before and after for starters. What was once a genuine opportunity to directly question the PM has turned into endless attempts to ‘go viral’.
 
Reactions: shmmeee
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jun 12, 2024
  • #37,536
shmmeee said:
Yeah. Social media has fucked elections. I do wonder how it would have impacted historic elections.
Click to expand...
They had their own forms I guess!

The Election of 1774 in the County of Warwick

With an election on the horizon, it might be nice to look at a past parliamentary election from a cultural historical perspective. Here, we look at the 1774 election for ...
www.ourwarwickshire.org.uk
 

Philosoraptor

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2024
  • #37,537
It's amazing no one else has thought about funding local services, i.e. Libraries etc, by actually taxing richer people more.

General election 2024: Greens vow £70bn tax hike on wealthiest

The Green Party says it will set out plans for a “game-changing” transformation in the UK.
www.bbc.co.uk

The Green Party has pledged to raise taxes on UK's top earners in its manifesto, claiming the plans will generate £70bn a year to mend "broken Britain".

The plans include raising the National Insurance (NI) rate to 8% on annual wages above £50,270 - equivalent to an extra £283.74 per year in tax for someone earning £55,000.


To pay for their plans the party has proposed a new wealth tax charged at 1% on all assets worth more than £10m declared in a self-assessment tax return, increasing to 2% on all assets above £1bn.

They would also reform the NI system.

Currently Employees pay no NI on earnings of up to £12,570, 8% on earnings of between £12,570 and £50,270, and 2% on earnings of above £50,270 for the 2023/24 tax year.

Under the Greens' plans, the 8% rate would be paid on all wages above the upper earnings threshold.

The Greens said they would also:

  • Introduce a carbon tax on businesses starting at £120 per tonne emitted, rising to £500 per tonne over ten years, to push businesses to decarbonise
  • Expand the 75% windfall tax on fossil fuel profits to banks, aiming to raise an extra £9bn a year
  • Bring Capital Gains Tax in line with income tax bands.
 
Reactions: Jamskidavaoccfc, chiefdave, skybluetony176 and 2 others

Philosoraptor

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2024
  • #37,538
Interest stuff coming out from France. People saying they are having their Liz Truss moment.

Hole in the economy etc

Reason why GE was called over there?

Press conference 11.00am (10.00am UK)
 
Last edited: Jun 12, 2024

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2024
  • #37,539
Philosoraptor said:
It's amazing no one else has thought about funding local services, i.e. Libraries etc, by actually taxing richer people more.

General election 2024: Greens vow £70bn tax hike on wealthiest

The Green Party says it will set out plans for a “game-changing” transformation in the UK.
www.bbc.co.uk

The Green Party has pledged to raise taxes on UK's top earners in its manifesto, claiming the plans will generate £70bn a year to mend "broken Britain".

The plans include raising the National Insurance (NI) rate to 8% on annual wages above £50,270 - equivalent to an extra £283.74 per year in tax for someone earning £55,000.


To pay for their plans the party has proposed a new wealth tax charged at 1% on all assets worth more than £10m declared in a self-assessment tax return, increasing to 2% on all assets above £1bn.

They would also reform the NI system.

Currently Employees pay no NI on earnings of up to £12,570, 8% on earnings of between £12,570 and £50,270, and 2% on earnings of above £50,270 for the 2023/24 tax year.

Under the Greens' plans, the 8% rate would be paid on all wages above the upper earnings threshold.

The Greens said they would also:

  • Introduce a carbon tax on businesses starting at £120 per tonne emitted, rising to £500 per tonne over ten years, to push businesses to decarbonise
  • Expand the 75% windfall tax on fossil fuel profits to banks, aiming to raise an extra £9bn a year
  • Bring Capital Gains Tax in line with income tax bands.
Click to expand...
The Greens have bought a few things into the mix

Firstly they’ve demonstrated perfectly how loaded the tax system is against working class people.

Secondly in England at least they the only mainstream party that’s radical.

Thirdly they’re the only socialist party you can vote for in England who have a chance of getting in.

My heart and head says vote Green, I’ve just got this niggle in the back of my head that voting Labour in Rugby is the only chance of stopping the Tories winning. I have come to the conclusion though that if Labour can’t win Rugby against the current backdrop they never will again so whoever you vote for is a wasted vote unless you vote Tory so you may as well vote with your heart.
 
Reactions: Earlsdon_Skyblue1 and duffer
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2024
  • #37,540
skybluetony176 said:
The Greens have bought a few things into the mix

Firstly they’ve demonstrated perfectly how loaded the tax system is against working class people.

Secondly in England at least they the only mainstream party that’s radical.

Thirdly they’re the only socialist party you can vote for in England who have a chance of getting in.

My heart and head says vote Green, I’ve just got this niggle in the back of my head that voting Labour in Rugby is the only chance of stopping the Tories winning. I have come to the conclusion though that if Labour can’t win Rugby against the current backdrop they never will again so whoever you vote for is a wasted vote unless you vote Tory so you may as well vote with your heart.
Click to expand...
Looking at the last few GEs the Greens have no chance of winning W+L, but even taking aside what Starmer’s Labour has become, our sitting Labour MP has done (or not done) enough locally to deserve being unseated.

The question is if I dislike those two enough to allow having a Tory instead.
 

Nuskyblue

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2024
  • #37,541
Philosoraptor said:
It's amazing no one else has thought about funding local services, i.e. Libraries etc, by actually taxing richer people more.

General election 2024: Greens vow £70bn tax hike on wealthiest

The Green Party says it will set out plans for a “game-changing” transformation in the UK.
www.bbc.co.uk

The Green Party has pledged to raise taxes on UK's top earners in its manifesto, claiming the plans will generate £70bn a year to mend "broken Britain".

The plans include raising the National Insurance (NI) rate to 8% on annual wages above £50,270 - equivalent to an extra £283.74 per year in tax for someone earning £55,000.


To pay for their plans the party has proposed a new wealth tax charged at 1% on all assets worth more than £10m declared in a self-assessment tax return, increasing to 2% on all assets above £1bn.

They would also reform the NI system.

Currently Employees pay no NI on earnings of up to £12,570, 8% on earnings of between £12,570 and £50,270, and 2% on earnings of above £50,270 for the 2023/24 tax year.

Under the Greens' plans, the 8% rate would be paid on all wages above the upper earnings threshold.

The Greens said they would also:

  • Introduce a carbon tax on businesses starting at £120 per tonne emitted, rising to £500 per tonne over ten years, to push businesses to decarbonise
  • Expand the 75% windfall tax on fossil fuel profits to banks, aiming to raise an extra £9bn a year
  • Bring Capital Gains Tax in line with income tax bands.
Click to expand...

I think taxing the likes of Amazon a fair whack would also go some, the rate that they pay is a joke.
 
Reactions: Brighton Sky Blue and shmmeee

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2024
  • #37,542
Mr Sunak discusses his deprived childhood tonight and how he was denied Sky TV
 
Reactions: AOM, Mucca Mad Boys, Skybluekyle and 5 others

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2024
  • #37,543
skybluetony176 said:
The Greens have bought a few things into the mix

Firstly they’ve demonstrated perfectly how loaded the tax system is against working class people.

Secondly in England at least they the only mainstream party that’s radical.

Thirdly they’re the only socialist party you can vote for in England who have a chance of getting in.

My heart and head says vote Green, I’ve just got this niggle in the back of my head that voting Labour in Rugby is the only chance of stopping the Tories winning. I have come to the conclusion though that if Labour can’t win Rugby against the current backdrop they never will again so whoever you vote for is a wasted vote unless you vote Tory so you may as well vote with your heart.
Click to expand...

FYI Rugby is predicted to be a Lab gain
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2024
  • #37,544
Nuskyblue said:
I think taxing the likes of Amazon a fair whack would also go some, the rate that they pay is a joke.
Click to expand...

The whole circle jerk with the big four needs looking at. It seems whatever you do the big company lawyers manage to wriggle out of it and smaller companies get hit. Like the rest of the legal system I guess.
 
Reactions: Sky_Blue_Dreamer

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2024
  • #37,545
Interesting.



 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2024
  • #37,546
Where does the incoming government believe the growth is going to magically appear from? Is there any immediate stimulus or is it just more wishful thinking?

UK GDP stagnated in wet April; Wall Street hits record high as US inflation falls – as it happened

UK GDP failed to grow in April, as wet weather hit retailers and construction firms
www.theguardian.com
 
Reactions: Sky_Blue_Dreamer

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2024
  • #37,547
shmmeee said:
Interesting.



Click to expand...

One of my probably completely unworkable ideas would be to charge vehicle excise duty based on mileage, as recorded each year at MOT and / or at change of ownership with different rates for different types of engine.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2024
  • #37,548
fernandopartridge said:
One of my probably completely unworkable ideas would be to charge vehicle excise duty based on mileage, as recorded each year at MOT and / or at change of ownership with different rates for different types of engine.
Click to expand...

Well that’s what I was thinking actually in a way. Scrap VED and instead put the tax on petrol (essentially what we’re already doing) so people pay per mile. But then that’s all fucked with electric cars. Weirdly the right thing is probably to do what the greens want with a carbon tax, reduce petrol duty and increase VED to account for weight and other damage to roads maybe.

Surprised me that current petrol tax is above the recommended carbon tax tho
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2024
  • #37,549
fernandopartridge said:
One of my probably completely unworkable ideas would be to charge vehicle excise duty based on mileage, as recorded each year at MOT and / or at change of ownership with different rates for different types of engine.
Click to expand...
How do the Chinese do it, just asking?
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2024
  • #37,550
fernandopartridge said:
One of my probably completely unworkable ideas would be to charge vehicle excise duty based on mileage, as recorded each year at MOT and / or at change of ownership with different rates for different types of engine.
Click to expand...
Add it to the cost of fuel at the pump. I’m sure some boffin could work out a formula to do just what you propose. Then whoever buys the more fuel, stands to reason that they’re either using the roads most or have a gas guzzling/polluting vehicle.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2024
  • #37,551
wingy said:
How do the Chinese do it, just asking?
Click to expand...
Through dictatorship
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2024
  • #37,552
skybluetony176 said:
Add it to the cost of fuel at the pump. I’m sure some boffin could work out a formula to do just what you propose. Then whoever buys the more fuel, stands to reason that they’re either using the roads most or have a gas guzzling/polluting vehicle.
Click to expand...

What do you do about super heavy electric cars damaging the roads though? It’s not all anti pollution it has to fix potholes and stuff to.
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2024
  • #37,553
Yet they appear to drive in the million's?
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2024
  • #37,554
shmmeee said:
What do you do about super heavy electric cars damaging the roads though? It’s not all anti pollution it has to fix potholes and stuff to.
Click to expand...
Or catching fire, question for emergency services clean up
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2024
  • #37,555
wingy said:
Or catching fire, question for emergency services clean up
Click to expand...

This is a bit of a myth. Petrol cars catch fire at a higher rate. Though if we bring all these new cheap Chinese EVs in maybe that’ll change.
 
Reactions: Nuskyblue
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 1071
  • 1072
  • 1073
  • 1074
  • 1075
  • …
  • 1495
Next
First Prev 1073 of 1495 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • chiefdaveA moment ago
  • shmmeee2 minutes ago
  • Ian177911 minutes ago
  • ... and 3 more.
  • Total: 35 (members: 6, guests: 29)
    Share:
    Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
    • Home
    • Forums
    • General Discussion
    • Off Topic Chat
    • Default Style
    • Contact us
    • Terms and rules
    • Privacy policy
    • Help
    • Home
    Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
    Menu
    Log in

    Register

    • Home
    • Forums
      • New posts
      • Search forums
    • What's new
      • New posts
      • Latest activity
    • Members
      • Current visitors
    • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
    X

    Privacy & Transparency

    We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

    • Personalized ads and content
    • Content measurement and audience insights

    Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

    X

    Privacy & Transparency

    We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

    • Personalized ads and content
    • Content measurement and audience insights

    Do you accept cookies and these technologies?