I want to meet the people that consider both themselves and Nigel Farage woke
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
Likewise for those who class themselves as 'not woke' but the Mail as 'woke'. Daily Express for them eh
Now is not the time for an inquiry said Boris Johnson. I wonder why he says that?Latest email from the Good Law Project, following day 1 of the PPE procurement court case. We have a truly corrupt government.
=========
Dear Friend,
Today was the first day of our High Court legal challenge over Government’s award of PPE contracts. Here are three of the most shocking revelations from Court.
1) Government prioritised companies because of who they knew and not what they could deliver. Take Pestfix and Multibrands. Both suppliers emailed the senior official in charge of NHS procurement explaining their ability to supply PPE. Multibrands did so on 20th March 2020, a week before Pestfix. Multibrands received no response.
By contrast, Pestfix’s email resulted in their allocation to the “VIP lane”, where companies were fast-tracked to lucrative contracts. Why? An ex-director of PestFix was an “old school friend” of the official’s father-in-law.
2) Ministers did not want their political contacts to have to wait in line with everyone else. Evidence read out in Court revealed “...ministers and senior officials sometimes introduce offers of PPE and want them personally handled rather than going through surveys and bulk routes. Some of these contacts simply flatly refuse to proceed via a webform....."
3) The banks were so concerned about Government’s lack of due diligence on companies who had been handed huge contracts that they halted payments. An email from a civil servant stated “It is... imperative that we rectify the with supplier due diligence to ensure we do not leave ourselves at unacceptable risk of fraud/loss”
Thank you as ever for your support. There will be more from Court tomorrow. If you’re interested, our skeleton can be read here.
Jo Maugham
Director of Good Law Project
Patel intervenes as the last minute to delay the release of the Daniel Morgan panel report.
Cited national security apparently. They're going to redact all the juicy shit. They'll never let the truth get out.
Latest email from the Good Law Project, following day 1 of the PPE procurement court case. We have a truly corrupt government.
=========
Dear Friend,
Today was the first day of our High Court legal challenge over Government’s award of PPE contracts. Here are three of the most shocking revelations from Court.
1) Government prioritised companies because of who they knew and not what they could deliver. Take Pestfix and Multibrands. Both suppliers emailed the senior official in charge of NHS procurement explaining their ability to supply PPE. Multibrands did so on 20th March 2020, a week before Pestfix. Multibrands received no response.
By contrast, Pestfix’s email resulted in their allocation to the “VIP lane”, where companies were fast-tracked to lucrative contracts. Why? An ex-director of PestFix was an “old school friend” of the official’s father-in-law.
2) Ministers did not want their political contacts to have to wait in line with everyone else. Evidence read out in Court revealed “...ministers and senior officials sometimes introduce offers of PPE and want them personally handled rather than going through surveys and bulk routes. Some of these contacts simply flatly refuse to proceed via a webform....."
3) The banks were so concerned about Government’s lack of due diligence on companies who had been handed huge contracts that they halted payments. An email from a civil servant stated “It is... imperative that we rectify the with supplier due diligence to ensure we do not leave ourselves at unacceptable risk of fraud/loss”
Thank you as ever for your support. There will be more from Court tomorrow. If you’re interested, our skeleton can be read here.
Jo Maugham
Director of Good Law Project
If you are looking for JOI there are better websites for that.Is Jocyln wearing his wife’s kimono this morning?
Classic Grendel/Tory.
Ignore the content (highlighting government corruption) and instead make a comment about the author.
When the author is a moron why would you not comment on him
I know exactly why you're commenting on him. Classic deflection tactics.
Whether you think he's a moron or not, what do you think of the content of the email?
Particularly given the quotes do not come from him, but rather evidence given in court.
What are your thoughts on the content of the email?how is it deflection when he takes high profile cases and a high court judge has poured scorn over his motives - the main motive being making money
how is it deflection when he takes high profile cases and a high court judge has poured scorn over his motives - the main motive being making money
how is it deflection when he takes high profile cases and a high court judge has poured scorn over his motives - the main motive being making money
No - he can’t get the fox blood stains out of it.Is Jocyln wearing his wife’s kimono this morning?
What are your thoughts on the content of the email?
A bit like the ministers you keep defending then.
You're still ignoring the email.
what a surpriseHas there been a judgement that shows corruption? I can’t see it.
what a surprise
It’s an e mail from someone with an agenda to trouser money in my view - it’s ironic as his actions are purely motivated by greed and dubious exploitation’s of the legal system - I’m amazed your such a fan
Again. Deflecting.
Forget who the email is from. Read the evidence given in court (i.e. not by the author of the email).
Is Jocyln wearing his wife’s kimono this morning?
What’s the verdict?
Also it’s not deflecting. On the one hand you and people like you defend the likes of Maugham and his behaviour as he supports your political narrative and also at the same time ignore his blatant attempts to use political and tax legislation to feather his own windmill nest
He has zero interest in anything but making money for himself.
Has Mr Johnson been arrested yet? Has Mr Maugham paid the builders half a million quid they took him to court over yet?
Latest email from the Good Law Project, following day 1 of the PPE procurement court case. We have a truly corrupt government.
=========
Dear Friend,
Today was the first day of our High Court legal challenge over Government’s award of PPE contracts. Here are three of the most shocking revelations from Court.
1) Government prioritised companies because of who they knew and not what they could deliver. Take Pestfix and Multibrands. Both suppliers emailed the senior official in charge of NHS procurement explaining their ability to supply PPE. Multibrands did so on 20th March 2020, a week before Pestfix. Multibrands received no response.
By contrast, Pestfix’s email resulted in their allocation to the “VIP lane”, where companies were fast-tracked to lucrative contracts. Why? An ex-director of PestFix was an “old school friend” of the official’s father-in-law.
2) Ministers did not want their political contacts to have to wait in line with everyone else. Evidence read out in Court revealed “...ministers and senior officials sometimes introduce offers of PPE and want them personally handled rather than going through surveys and bulk routes. Some of these contacts simply flatly refuse to proceed via a webform....."
3) The banks were so concerned about Government’s lack of due diligence on companies who had been handed huge contracts that they halted payments. An email from a civil servant stated “It is... imperative that we rectify the with supplier due diligence to ensure we do not leave ourselves at unacceptable risk of fraud/loss”
Thank you as ever for your support. There will be more from Court tomorrow. If you’re interested, our skeleton can be read here.
Jo Maugham
Director of Good Law Project
His brother was on the radio earlier and this is as shady as fuck. Been numerous enquiries into this this being the the first fully independent one and it sounds like every t has been crossed and every i dotted by everyone from lawyers in various specialist fields and the Met themselves. There has been a trial but it collapsed and one of the people in that trial was employed by the News of the World (amongst other newspapers) has since been jailed over phone tapping I believe, is connected to Andy Coulson etc etc. It sounds like this has more to do with government connections to certain media companies and the government has pulled numerous tricks to delay the publication (including using Prince Phillips death as an excuse) before this latest effort.Patel intervenes as the last minute to delay the release of the Daniel Morgan panel report.
Cited national security apparently. They're going to redact all the juicy shit. They'll never let the truth get out.
His brother was on the radio earlier and this is as shady as fuck. Been numerous enquiries into this this being the the first fully independent one and it sounds like every t has been crossed and every i dotted by everyone from lawyers in various specialist fields and the Met themselves. There has been a trial but it collapsed and one of the people in that trial was employed by the News of the World (amongst other newspapers) has since been jailed over phone tapping I believe, is connected to Andy Coulson etc etc. It sounds like this has more to do with government connections to certain media companies and the government has pulled numerous tricks to delay the publication (including using Prince Phillips death as an excuse) before this latest effort.
Channel 4 covered it last year and its still up on their streaming service.There's been numerous documentaries and podcasts on it.
Not sure if this is true or not but I’ve heard it suggested that a guy from the collapsed trial who then went on to be jailed over phone tapping I think was employed by Coulson upon his release.Been following the case for years. Its as corrupt as fuck.
There's been numerous documentaries and podcasts on it.
The NOTW employees involved make Coulson look like a paragon of virtue
Keeping their policies confidential is an interesting new tacticWhat an utter clown this bloke is.
Cons +4
You think?? Can’t imagine anyone actually watching it.The perverse fact is that most viewers will be Labour Party supporters.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?