D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
Not as much of an evening wasted as those of us reading it.
Not really that wound up, more bored with it now. We both wasted an evening arguing over it, what sad lives we must both live.
Tomorrows edition is going to involve us arguing over whether its potatoe or potato, prepare your cases teams.Not as much of an evening wasted as those of us reading it.
Tomorrows edition is going to involve us arguing over whether its potatoe or potato, prepare your cases teams.
That's true.
I'd still be surprised if either go up automatically mind you, and amazed if they both do.
Shame it's against us, as I'm all for the little clubs punching above their weight - and Burton in the second tier would be superb.
You'd expect, however, Wigan to come through, and then there's a space open for someone else. Now of course Burton are flying atm, but if they hold on it really is a massive achievement given the size of their club and size of their squad.
Check out the back page of yesterdays programme. Burtons squad is bigger than ours.
Pedigree chump☺There's a difference between number of players and number of players with 'pedigree'.
In our hands means that no matter what other teams do we can still gain promotion e.g. we're top of the league and everybody has to better us. Promotion is not 'in our hands', if we win all of our remaining games then 99.9% of the time we will be promoted, however if Walsall and Burton also win all of their games then we will end up 3rd.
We are however capable of gaining promotion by putting the hard work in and gaining more points than the teams above us for the rest of the season. I understand the point you're trying to make but your use of the phrase 'in our hands' is incorrect.
Really now that would something.....We could win all of our games. Both Walsall and Burton couldn't. Simple!
We could win all of our games. Both Walsall and Burton couldn't. Simple!
Or he's referring to the fact they have to play each other. Which does mean he is technically correct.
I know.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Just checking
Or he's referring to the fact they have to play each other. Which does mean he is technically correct.
Your the one who said you laughed at anyone happy with a point vs walsall???
Now it's others who are disrespectful lol. You rly hate cov fans and flip flop to be annoyed in every situation
Not so much in our hands but within grasp. :thinking about:
When? I wasnt the one claiming their fans were idiots for thinking they come get something against us?
Football isn't played on a calculator
Looking at it, cov telegraph have misread it. My reading is that we are 15% probable for top two. It's gillingham who are 25%There is a neat little graphic in the CT from
experimental361.com giving us a 25% chance of making automatic and around 80% finishing fourth
Sorry can't do the link.
I'd say that is probably the ratio we are currently looking at.
I'd be surprised if the team with the best goal difference at the end of the season doesn't end up in one of the top two spots. Has it ever happened?
neither was i
but you did say you laughing at any fans who dont expect 3pts minimum
like i said you have scenarios in your head where you are superior to other fans and you hate them yet then you flip flop and say the same thing as other fans and STILL have a go
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?