dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
To be fair you used to get it quite regularly supporting a stance or opinion that was out there.
Then he would come on and say no that's not what has happened this is and blow it all out the window.
PWKH proved people wrong with facts? Oh ok find some.
The account in the name PWKH.
Don't really know what you are talking about regarding Facebook.
They only thing I know about is what has been on here regarding his spats on twitter. Which as I said if giving the ammo to the likes on here who have grudges from the past.
Please enlighten me why has he been blocked on Facebook. When was that and does it explain the hate on here that emirated from the days that he was posting on here.
Also as I say can you name one other journalist posting on here under their real name
And how much has turned out to be bollocks since? What did he get? Legal threats?To be fair you used to get it quite regularly supporting a stance or opinion that was out there.
Then he would come on and say no that's not what has happened this is and blow it all out the window.
You said he got blocked because of the beef with ccfc?
What's another journalist got to do with why he stopped posting?
You asked me why he got blocked I said I can only assume it's because of his debates with the club. I don't know the reason hence why I can only assume. I didn't even know he was I saw the twitter stuff on here only. Do you know the reason?
You asked why he can't post on here as a journalist. That's the only reason I can see that he stopped posting on here under his real name. No other journalists do it. So again I assume it's a bit of a no no. Again unless do you know the reason why he no longer posts on here?
To be fair you used to get it quite regularly supporting a stance or opinion that was out there.
Then he would come on and say no that's not what has happened this is and blow it all out the window.
So he stopped because it's his real name? A journo signed up the other day using his real name.
He got blocked because they were fed up of him posting crap and not backing it up.
Scrape that barrel.
There was a guy from the mail I think it was the other day who signed up. He used his full name.Which journalist is posting on here as their real name?
Who blocked him and what did he say that he then could not back up?
Interesting. Can you provide a link? Oh and also in still waiting for the quote from the charity about the other potential acl buyer and the bid was worthless. Can you provide that as well?
Why when you next go to a pub in kenilworth to ask certain people what they thought about him? Expect something very agricultural to come back.
There was a guy from the mail I think it was the other day who signed up. He used his full name.
For somebody who has made their own wiki, they aren't going to stop posting because it shows their name.
Erm, the Facebook ccfc group which is what I said originally.
I assume somebody runs the Facebook group and made the decision to block him? Who are they are what did he say that he couldn't back up?
Sorry who is the Mail journalist what opinions has he posted about our situation on here, apologies I have missed him?
It seems you have missed a lot.
Trying to say he stopped coming on because it was his real name is a bit strange.
Yes I have also missed your answers to my last two questions?
Type into google Sharipo bid for Ricoh and you will see the quote.
Can you provide me with the quote that says Higgs felt the council shafted Higgs by turning down the Sharipo bid?
I assume somebody runs the Facebook group and made the decision to block him? Who are they are what did he say that he couldn't back up?
Sorry who is the Mail journalist what opinions has he posted about our situation on here, apologies I have missed him?
The mail journo was asking about thoughts, he had written an article.
He was blocked because they were fed up of spamming and posting crap and then not backing anything up when questioned, pretty much like he did here.
So the mail Journalist is not on here posting his opinions and views as a fan of our situation and debating with people. Under his own name.
So do you know who blocked him from the Facebook acoountvabd what he actually said that was crap that he couldn't back up.
I also don't recall him posting any crap on here that he couldn't back up.
However I do recall him winning quite a few debates to be fair to him.
So the mail Journalist is not on here posting his opinions and views as a fan of our situation and debating with people. Under his own name.
So do you know who blocked him from the Facebook acoountvabd what he actually said that was crap that he couldn't back up.
I also don't recall him posting any crap on here that he couldn't back up.
However I do recall him winning quite a few debates to be fair to him.
Yes, the owner of the group. Have a look through previous posts.
Oh so it's changed now from journos not signing up with their real names to posting opinions and views?
Strange how he never seemed to answer questions that were tricky like he doesn't now.
His login being his name was never an issue, was it?
That's clearly what I always assumed. At the time I was always surprised to see him posting on here with his personal opinions under his own name. I used to be surprised with PWKH aswell.
People rarely do it. You have suggested one journalist who came on to ask a question.
Why is it do you think that you have no other journalists radio presenters ect on here posting their opinions?
Do you think it is by chance?
Or do you accept Simon Gilbert was doing something unusual.
Refreshing in my opinion but sadly still unusual.
That's clearly what I always assumed. At the time I was always surprised to see him posting on here with his personal opinions under his own name. I used to be surprised with PWKH aswell.
People rarely do it. You have suggested one journalist who came on to ask a question.
Why is it do you think that you have no other journalists radio presenters ect on here posting their opinions?
Do you think it is by chance?
Or do you accept Simon Gilbert was doing something unusual.
Refreshing in my opinion but sadly still unusual.
Stuart Linnell has also posted on here under his name.
Again, why would somebody who makes their own Wiki page be bothered about using their own name?
He suddenly stopped posting because it used his own name, yet still used Twitter / FB etc under his own name?
Why did Stuart Linnel stop?
Yes he suddenly stopped posting because he is a journalist reporting for a local paper who is on here debating with people providing his own personal opinions.
Again you have given no explanation for why you currently have no other journalist, TV presenters, radio presenters or anyone else who support Coventry in a job where their personal opinions can be attributed to the media outlets they are employed by on here posting under their own names.
Personally I don't think that is coincidence but professionally it doesn't seem to be the done thing.
So name a journalist or radio presenter that's been on here under an alias. We know PWKH used at least one other account
I don't know why, maybe you should ask them?
So you think he just stopped posting because it is using his own name and it's not the done thing?
Bad luck to do jokes after lunchtime.
That's Geoffrey Robinson being interviewed by Simon Gilbert
Must be coincidence then that no other journo is doing it.
So he made 748 posts and then thought "shit, nobody else does this so I'd best not".
sorry still missing your explanation for no other journalist posts on here under their own name?
Who said he suddenly thought it and it wasn't his bosses saying people could associate your opinions as representing ours so we suggest you stop posting in there under your name.
Or yes he himself is capable of deciding not to post for such reasons.
I take it there is nothing you have done regularly in your life then decide it may not be the wisest thing to do and stop doing it?
So I need to be a mind reader now?
What has any other journo posting on here with their own name got to actually do with it? Have others racked up over 700 posts and then stopped?
Surely it's not really much different to him using Twitter or Facebook in his own name?
This is all very strange.
Why isn't it a good idea, but it is on a Facebook group / Twitter etc?Should not need to explain it to you, but hey ho.
The fact that not a single other journalist does it supports the idea that's it's not actually a good idea.
What does it matter if he made 10 posts or 10,000 posts. At some point either he or someone else told him that it's not a good idea.
Why isn't it a good idea, but it is on a Facebook group / Twitter etc?
It's the worst barrel scraping you have stopped to. It's actually a bit strange.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?