Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Sacked referee David Coote accused of making indecent image of child
The former Premier League referee is due in court in Nottingham on Thursday.
Yeah, it’s because they’re being reproduced it’s the same as making them.It always confuses me as "making" would assume he was taking the photo but when you read it, he's downloading / sharing them.
It was pretty obvious he was a wrongun from that video as well.
Wow. Horrible c**tSacked referee David Coote accused of making indecent image of child
The former Premier League referee is due in court in Nottingham on Thursday.www.bbc.co.uk
Also in trouble for snorting drugs with banknotes. My thoughts are the same as yours really, what the fuck was he thinking.My sympathy for him has now disappeared.
What the fuck is wrong with people.
I'm not researching it but i would assume the worst kind means there is actual abuse involved in the video and that the children are very young. Fucking grim.Do I dare even want to know how the categorise that kind of thing? It sounds horrendous.
I read through the case of Ian Watkins following his death this week and I cannot get my head around how people can be like this.
Pardon? This is mental!There but for the grace of god go many people
Far far more prevalent than you’d believe looking at the false testosterone on here. Very likely to be someone in your group of friends
Pardon? This is mental!
Did a project with Relate many years ago which was around providing support to kids. The figures they had were absolutely mind blowing. You may think the number you hear about is high but it really is just the tip of the iceberg.Fucking hell man why so many nonces?
Its not upset me i just don't know what you're on about...Stats show it Tom
Category would be looking at something on line and downloading it and sharing it even on a private group
Sorry to upset you
Hidden pandemic: study uncovers scale of online child harm - Edinburgh Impact
One in eight children around the world have been victims of sexual exploitation and abuse online, new study found.impact.ed.ac.uk
1- we all do things wrong most of us don’t get caught or have to pay the consequences.Its not upset me i just don't know what you're on about...
1. There but for the grace of god go many people - So its only by the grace of God i'm not a nonce
2. Far far more prevalent than you’d believe looking at the false testosterone on here - I don't know what the bit about false testosterone even means and how it relates to nonce numbers.
3. Very likely to be someone in your group of friends - Very likely seems to be a stretch and its a needlessly provocative thing to say.
I think the common trend with these people is they have perversions which gradually become more extreme to keep them ‘satisfied’, ultimately crossing into illegal noncing and bestiality.I'm not researching it but i would assume the worst kind means there is actual abuse involved in the video and that the children are very young. Fucking grim.
I think in many cases you'd be right. Certainly the likes of Watkins it likely went from lots of drugs and having control over groupies, some quite young, to the monster he became. It seems very unlikely the really grim stuff was a starting point.I think the common trend with these people is they have perversions which gradually become more extreme to keep them ‘satisfied’, ultimately crossing into illegal noncing and bestiality.
Sadly I’m familiar with it from having been a union rep to teachers guilty of doing similar to Coote and that’s how they explained it.I think in many cases you'd be right. Certainly the likes of Watkins it likely went from lots of drugs and having control over groupies, some quite young, to the monster he became. It seems very unlikely the really grim stuff was a starting point.
Ripping their nuts off seems a fair punishment to me.Sadly I’m familiar with it from having been a union rep to teachers guilty of doing similar to Coote and that’s how they explained it.
Must be honest, now with a baby son, the idea of someone molesting him and then sharing the results with other nonces makes me want their nuts ripping off.
What was he convicted of?Not long enough.
He admitted making an indecent image of a child in October.What was he convicted of?
Will be in line with sentencing guidelinesHe admitted making an indecent image of a child in October.
9 months sentence, suspended for two years
I understand the point you’re making but you belittle it by saying calling someone a name and get 4 years cos that’s not what’s happenedFor child pornography. Huw Edwards the same
Call someone a name on Twitter though, 4 years..country is pathetic
I understand the point you’re making but you belittle it by saying calling someone a name and get 4 years cos that’s not what’s happened
You also in part diminish the crimes by lumping everything together as child pornography as it’s a huge spectrum of criminal activity
I understand the point you’re making but you belittle it by saying calling someone a name and get 4 years cos that’s not what’s happened
You also in part diminish the crimes by lumping everything together as child pornography as it’s a huge spectrum of criminal activity
Did some work with Relate years ago around child counselling (nothing on the actual counselling side you'll all be pleased to know, tech stuff) and they said the same. What we hear about is the tip of the iceburg.it’s an epidemic the police think 350000 are guilty of similar crimes. Bless the victims and all those affected innocently by his actions too
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?