Sky Blue Harry H
Well-Known Member
Likely to have been tapped up by Fatty Evans, so unlikely to be us, but would be funny if we pinched him!
Yes. That, combined with Evans ' connection with Rose at Mansfield (although you'd think that might put him off). At the end of the day, if we were interested, it'd probably come down to wages. Glad that a few players have now moved /are moving as it may make it easier for us to acquire someone, without it becoming a bidding war. Fingers and everything else crossed.Given the amount of money they've earned this season from selling players, I'd be astounded if it were us.
Yes. That, combined with Evans ' connection with Rose at Mansfield (although you'd think that might put him off). At the end of the day, if we were interested, it'd probably come down to wages. Glad that a few players have now moved /are moving as it may make it easier for us to acquire someone, without it becoming a bidding war. Fingers and everything else crossed.
3. Whatever we say, they will assume we have money to spendLooking at those who have moved on, I still have doubts whether there would be any significant room in the budget to compete with the likes of Peterborough - only Beavon and Maycock have departed as of late, and both would be on fairly mediocre contracts. With only a week left of the window I fear MR may be pushed into securing loans, as any team who possesses a contracted goalscorer would only up the ante if we were to put a bid in for two reasons. 1. They know we're in need of a goalscorer. 2. There is little time to replace them once they departed.
3. Whatever we say, they will assume we have money to spend
We've already got 3 left backs so it's a no from me H
Thought you were called Hill?LOL SAME NAME
Should we just get rose now and move on from Chaplin play him in the number 10 role he would score goals for us
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Should we just get rose now and move on from Chaplin play him in the number 10 role he would score goals for us
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
I would have Rose ahead of our current choices all day.
No doubt of that.
Baffled how we (actually im not) after recieving at least £3M from Maddison/McNulty this summer , we cant dictate and dangle the cash at strapped clubs in league 2! For strikers such as Doige/Rose/Kee or even Christian Dennis?
Because we have tossers for owners ?No doubt of that.
Baffled how we (actually im not) after recieving at least £3M from Maddison/McNulty this summer , we cant dictate and dangle the cash at strapped clubs in league 2! For strikers such as Doige/Rose/Kee or even Christian Dennis?
The buy cheap and young then sell for profit is all well and good but you can't have your whole transfer policy based on that, its nuts. Sometimes you need to buy for now not for the future. Our transfer policy has been very blinded
Fully agree, I mentioned this week's ago and got lambasted for it, the first team needs to be priority when it comes to transfer business. Don't even get me started on the Chaplin embarrassment, should have moved on and signed a replacement weeks ago.
We did sign replacements?
Just because they havent done much in a couple of games with no service doesn't mean they don't exist. It was the same last year when McNulty wasn't scoring people just demanded signing more and more strikers.
Because we don’t have the cash to dangle? The owners won’t put cash in to support the losses.No doubt of that.
Baffled how we (actually im not) after recieving at least £3M from Maddison/McNulty this summer , we cant dictate and dangle the cash at strapped clubs in league 2! For strikers such as Doige/Rose/Kee or even Christian Dennis?
So do you believe we did good business in the transfer market?We did sign replacements?
Just because they havent done much in a couple of games with no service doesn't mean they don't exist. It was the same last year when McNulty wasn't scoring people just demanded signing more and more strikers.
I don’t think this is possible to answer 3 games in to the new seasonSo do you believe we did good business in the transfer market?
I can't comment yet as I haven't seen them play yet.
We're back to the first 3 months of last season again. Hiwula has missed the one chance we've created in both opening league games and suddenly all our strikers are shit, just like McNulty was when he was played through on the diagonal vs Colchester and slid it inches wide, on the back of failing to create anything vs Newport and Yeovil.
It's the midfield that is broken and we're creating a half chance or two per game and expecting our strikers to have proved they are McNulty replacements. Nothing will get better until that changes and until it does we simply have no idea whether the forward signings are any good or not.
So do you believe we did good business in the transfer market?
I can't comment yet as I haven't seen them play yet.
They've played 3 games ffsI am disappointed in a number of our acquisitions and general policy over the summer
MR has gone for quantity and not quality in several cases. Don't get it !
Absolutely bang on.We're back to the first 3 months of last season again. Hiwula has missed the one chance we've created in both opening league games and suddenly all our strikers are shit, just like McNulty was when he was played through on the diagonal vs Colchester and slid it inches wide, on the back of failing to create anything vs Newport and Yeovil.
It's the midfield that is broken and we're creating a half chance or two per game and expecting our strikers to have proved they are McNulty replacements. Nothing will get better until that changes and until it does we simply have no idea whether the forward signings are any good or not.
I think people think it's like FIFA where you can have one player pick it up at the half way line and they should skin about 5 players then bang it in the top corner. Otherwise they are shit and we should have replaced mcnulty.Just because they havent done much in a couple of games with no service doesn't mean they don't exist. It was the same last year when McNulty wasn't scoring people just demanded signing more and more strikers.
The buy cheap and young then sell for profit is all well and good but you can't have your whole transfer policy based on that, its nuts. Sometimes you need to buy for now not for the future. Our transfer policy has been very blinded
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?