Said this yesterday morning, And we still have 3 more pages discussing the Telegraphs "alternative facts". If the Cov Telegraph is held in such disdain by the forumites, why do people continue to jump on every story as if its gospel ?
I think it was the fact it came from Andy Turner, I still thought he may have legitimate connections at the club and the story therefore probably was legit. If anything, this has shattered that belief that the Cov tel has any more of an insight than you or I.
What a bunch of clowns. They got it wrong, just admit and own it.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Can anyone else see MR calling Lameiras into his office, telling him he's getting a new contract only for a day later call him back in to tell him he's not really?What a bunch of clowns. They got it wrong, just admit and own it.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Can anyone else see MR calling Lameiras into his office, telling him he's getting a new contract only for a day later call him back in to tell him he's not really?
Come on CT... stop being embarrassing
tbf to Simon / Gilbert / Giblet, it kind of show what he has to work under. Both he and Turner just apologised, the paper tries to justify it.Can anyone else see MR calling Lameiras into his office, telling him he's getting a new contract only for a day later call him back in to tell him he's not really?
Come on CT... stop being embarrassing
tbf to Simon / Gilbert / Giblet, it kind of show what he has to work under. Both he and Turner just apologised, the paper tries to justify it.
When your paymasters do that... it kind of shows where journalism's going.
Wouldn't pay much attention to Crowley-crapped himself and skirted around questions and issues when at Ccfc. Bit of a Sisu man it seemed.That's what Crowley was having a go about.
It's not beyond the realms of possibility that Lameiras was offered a contract he quickly rejected with Robins refusing to budge on it having done what he needed to ensure Lameiras is now compensation eligible.Can anyone else see MR calling Lameiras into his office, telling him he's getting a new contract only for a day later call him back in to tell him he's not really?
Come on CT... stop being embarrassing
I always thought that he would have needed to be here 3 years before we got compensation?It's not beyond the realms of possibility that Lameiras was offered a contract he quickly rejected with Robins refusing to budge on it having done what he needed to ensure Lameiras is now compensation eligible.
It's purely based on age but the current trend is for the Professional Football Compensation Committee (PFCC) to come up with a base compensation figure (for U-24 players that have not come through the academy) by how established they are in the first team i.e. games played and then layer in further appearance fees and a sell on clause. Based on that you could even speculate that it was why Lameiras played so often in recent weeks, to drive up his base compensation fee... :emoji_smiling_imp: (although we don't know if he was actually offered a contract or not).I always thought that he would have needed to be here 3 years before we got compensation?
At least club comms went out without being riddled with grammatical errors.Wouldn't pay much attention to Crowley-crapped himself and skirted around questions and issues when at Ccfc. Bit of a Sisu man it seemed.
They did, but selective they were. But yes much better than the useless person "apparently" doing the job now.At least club comms went out without being riddled with grammatical errors.
Some choice; beautifully written propaganda or poorly written facts!They did, but selective they were. But yes much better than the useless person "apparently" doing the job now.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?