Otis
Well-Known Member
Rather than the chump players we did get?
Rather than the chump players we did get?All the high earners at the club moved on in the summer. Mowbray probably thought he could get some Champ players with the money.
Have the rest of the league had a rise though?
Would love to see the figures.
What I don't get (and Nick alluded to it too) is that if our budget was so drastically cut then why was Mowbray chasing Championship players, the likes of Wilson, who we surely never had a cat in hell's chance of ever getting?
Have the rest of the league had a rise though?
Would love to see the figures.
What I don't get (and Nick alluded to it too) is that if our budget was so drastically cut then why was Mowbray chasing Championship players, the likes of Wilson, who we surely never had a cat in hell's chance of ever getting?
Well then he made the wrong decisions. Would've been better off spending that cash on real men in positions we need.
He has admitted himself he screwed it up as well. We needed some solid league 1 players.
I said ages ago that he seemed to spend far to long looking for Championship players as we just can't pay the wages they want, his major fault was his player knowledge is higher up the food chain than we can afford.
You'd have thought he could have figured the lower leagues out after nearly 2 seasons.
You'd have thought he could have figured the lower leagues out after nearly 2 seasons.
You would but I don't think he had.
Yep. Wednesday had such a familiar ring about it and we hardly won a header all night.I think he was trying to play fancy football, which is great if it works but like against wimbledon. They just had a big lump up front who could win everything, put every ball on his head and play off that.
It has to be effective in our league.
Yep. Wednesday had such a familiar ring about it and we hardly won a header all night.
Yeah, where has this massive cut story come from? Who has said that? Can only see it mentioned in here and nowhere else.
I wonder if the sudden fees are because of the changes to loans. Last year the parent teams probably let them go out because they could just phone up and get them back.Who has said massive cut? He said reduced but not significantly. He was just saying last year Armstrong Murphy and Kent cost us nothing. He has said enquiries for loans this year and people were asking for fees. It was reported on the radio.
I wonder if the sudden fees are because of the changes to loans. Last year the parent teams probably let them go out because they could just phone up and get them back.
Now it is a set time, so more of a commitment so they want a fee?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?