Wow, must be criminal to have a view different to those of you on here! I support views on both sides of the argument. I just dont understand why supporters think that a company who have invested 60mil into the club will just walk away. Of course they are going to fight for it!
May 4, 2009 - Uploaded by azz08vids
Harry Hill's TV -- Fight. azz08vids·7 videos. SubscribeSubscribedUnsubscribe 9. 28,632. Like 33 Dislike 1. Like ...
I suspect that everyone one of them you name will turn out to be neutral, objective, rational or even anti-SISU in reality...just that they listen & try to consider & understand (which is usually the best way to win a war rather than the nuclear option). Their passion is directed to support CCFC rather than against the owners.
Opposing the club to get lower rent, F&B, pushing home a winding up order (CJ), and the notion that the club should not own it's own stadium isn't hardly behaviour I'd expect off a CCFC fan, yet, I'm amazed at how many people oppose CCFC.
No one here want SISU here, no one here thinks they've done a good job, no one here defends SISU... ... But some just support their club over a management company to oppose the club's ownership, which isn't a sustainable argument because when they go.
Some people are overly consumed in their hate for SISU - overall, they have damaged this club - this whole fiasco has become an anti-SISU protest as a result, alas, people are forgetting what the club needs to be sustainable and therefore, possibly even successful. I honestly can't see the most active of posters who oppose SISU on this forum holding the same views if it were say, PH4 negotiating.