Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Current Championship xG table (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Jamesimus
  • Start date Nov 10, 2024
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Ring Of Steel

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 10, 2024
  • #36
stupot07 said:
100% but people keep saying that teams have been lucky like we have been hard done too. I'm just pointing out we have had our own fair share of luck.

I don't see Derby being lucky with the Rudoni back pass. Rudoni didn't even look, the striker anticipated it, it was poor play by Rudoni not poor luck.
Click to expand...

I take your point- I don’t think we’re unlucky. I think our strikers are badly underperforming, meaning we’re failing to convert, and.. now we are where we are.
 
Reactions: stupot07

Ricketts

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 10, 2024
  • #37
I don’t know why we bother go to matches or playing football.
We should just leave it to the ipad wankers to tell us where our team has finished.
 
Reactions: ProfessorbyGrace, Jamesimus and Flying Fokker

Jamesimus

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 10, 2024
  • #38
Ring Of Steel said:
I take your point- I don’t think we’re unlucky. I think our strikers are badly underperforming, meaning we’re failing to convert, and.. now we are where we are.
Click to expand...

Well according to the xG table the strikers are actually not doing too badly, slightly underperforming. I guess really really good strikers would outperform the xG though…

However, the xGA and the GA are the biggest difference (no shit, we’re conceding silly goals from positions where the attacking player doesn’t actually have a great chance).
 
Reactions: Ring Of Steel

Jamesimus

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 10, 2024
  • #39
Ricketts said:
I don’t know why we bother go to matches or playing football.
We should just leave it to the ipad wankers to tell us where our team has finished.
Click to expand...

I guess because there’s some stats with some meaning behind them (that has been proven), we should just simulate the whole season - that would be way more enjoyable!
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 10, 2024
  • #40
stupot07 said:
Exactly, and the same about 7 or 8 we've scored. We haven't been unlucky, that's just football.
Click to expand...

The xg tables don't talk about luck though , it shows that we create high quality chances and quite a lot of them
 
Reactions: Jamesimus

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 10, 2024
  • #41
Jamesimus said:
Well according to the xG table the strikers are actually not doing too badly, slightly underperforming. I guess really really good strikers would outperform the xG though…

However, the xGA and the GA are the biggest difference (no shit, we’re conceding silly goals from positions where the attacking player doesn’t actually have a great chance).
Click to expand...
That's true yesterday but isn't always true, a team may have a low xGA but they have had 1-2 high quality chances but the rest of their shots are from 25 yards, whist we have had a lot of long rangers or low quality shots but the cumulation is a higher xG.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 10, 2024
  • #42
Yesterday both teams had an xG of 0.66 so both teams over performed significantly.

Coincidentally the best chance of the game was Aaron Connolly's on the 81st minute 0.24
 
Reactions: covcity4life and Jamesimus

Jamesimus

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 10, 2024
  • #43
stupot07 said:
That's true yesterday but isn't always true, a team may have a low xGA but they have had 1-2 high quality chances but the rest of their shots are from 25 yards, whist we have had a lot of long rangers or low quality shots but the cumulation is a higher xG.
Click to expand...

I’m not sure of the cumulative outcome of it, it may adjust for this? But I hear what you’re saying. Yesterday though Sunderland had two far better chances to score than the ones they did, meaning it obviously isn’t an exact science. So yes it was true yesterday, but also true for Derbys second goal the other day imo. Shit happens!



I’d also point out we don’t seem to take that many shots from range.
 

Jamesimus

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 10, 2024
  • #44
stupot07 said:
Coincidentally the best chance of the game was Aaron Connolly's on the 81st minute 0.24
Click to expand...

This does not surprise me. He’d not long come on as well.
 

Jamesimus

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 10, 2024
  • #45
stupot07 said:
Yesterday both teams had an xG of 0.66 so both teams over performed significantly.

Coincidentally the best chance of the game was Aaron Connolly's on the 81st minute 0.24
Click to expand...

What’s also interesting there is that both teams had the same xG and both teams drew. Almost as if there is a direct correlation between xG and how teams perform
 
Reactions: stupot07

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 10, 2024
  • #46
stupot07 said:
Yesterday both teams had an xG of 0.66 so both teams over performed significantly.

Coincidentally the best chance of the game was Aaron Connolly's on the 81st minute 0.24
Click to expand...

Well they will have low XG on their goals as they were both worldies
 
Reactions: Fergusons_Beard and Jamesimus

Jamesimus

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 10, 2024
  • #47
Evo1883 said:
Well they will have low XG on their goals as they were both worldies
Click to expand...

Isodor scored a great goal the other week on the volley. It actually had a high xG (can’t remember what), but likely because it was a ball over the top of the defence and he had time to take a touch and finish. He chose to hit it first time. Surprised the goalkeeper no doubt and could be a striker that outperforms his xG this season?
 

skybluecam

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 10, 2024
  • #48
xG +/- shouldn’t really be used in this way.

To do it properly you should use an xPts simulation.
 
Reactions: Jamesimus

Jamesimus

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 10, 2024
  • #49
skybluecam said:
xG +/- shouldn’t really be used in this way.

To do it properly you should use an xPts simulation.
Click to expand...

Go on then Cam, give it to us!
 

skybluecam

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 10, 2024
  • #50
Jamesimus said:
Go on then Cam, give it to us!
Click to expand...

2025-2026 Championship League Table

The 2025-2026 Championship League Table showing the record of every team in the tournament throughout the season
thefishy.co.uk

This one has us 5/6th. Thought we might be lower tbf.
 
Reactions: Evo1883 and Jamesimus

Jamesimus

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 10, 2024
  • #51
skybluecam said:

2025-2026 Championship League Table

The 2025-2026 Championship League Table showing the record of every team in the tournament throughout the season
thefishy.co.uk

This one has us 5/6th. Thought we might be lower tbf.
Click to expand...

Almost as if expected goals for and expected goals against is a good indicator to these things eh?
 

False9

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 10, 2024
  • #52
Jamesimus said:
View attachment 39371
We are 4th, (5th in the xGd table).

Some over achievers in there (Sunderland, West Brom, Millwall, Blackburn) and under achievers (Luton, Middlesbrough, Hull, Cardiff).

This is why whoever comes in, I expect us and some of those underachieving teams with decent forwards to start climbing the table. If Robins had stayed, I imagine we’d have seen the same.
Click to expand...
Spot on and this is why I believed strongly that Robins was/would turn it around.

If you think back to the losses, we didn't concede many chances but they kept going in.
 
Reactions: Jamesimus

Ring Of Steel

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 10, 2024
  • #53
skybluecam said:

2025-2026 Championship League Table

The 2025-2026 Championship League Table showing the record of every team in the tournament throughout the season
thefishy.co.uk

This one has us 5/6th. Thought we might be lower tbf.
Click to expand...

so the xg has us fourth, predicted points has us 6th- but yet Robins had apparently lost it and had to go as we were spiralling towards relegation, as opposed to the players not finishing chances.
 
Reactions: Fergusons_Beard, Frostie and Jamesimus

Jamesimus

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 10, 2024
  • #54
Ring Of Steel said:
so the xg has us fourth, predicted points has us 6th- but yet Robins had apparently lost it and had to go as we were spiralling towards relegation, as opposed to the players not finishing chances.
Click to expand...

*As opposed to defending properly

But I hear ya. The Norwich first half and that Eccles chance against Watford I think back to as times where we should have picked up more points.
 
Reactions: Fergusons_Beard and Ring Of Steel

Jamesimus

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 10, 2024
  • #55
Also, the Leeds game was poor but they look on another level so far this season and the stats back that up.
 

skybluecam

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 10, 2024
  • #56
Ring Of Steel said:
so the xg has us fourth, predicted points has us 6th- but yet Robins had apparently lost it and had to go as we were spiralling towards relegation, as opposed to the players not finishing chances.
Click to expand...
We’ve scored 20 off 20.9 xg, our players are finishing chances.

We were never going to get relegated.
 
Reactions: Ring Of Steel

Ring Of Steel

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 10, 2024
  • #57
skybluecam said:
We’ve scored 20 off 20.9 xg, our players are finishing chances.

We were never going to get relegated.
Click to expand...

I agree- yet we had endless posts on here detailing how we had no chance of even getting to 50 points, how we were already in a relegation dogfight, and how Robins’ time was up as we were heading straight to League One.
 

skybluecam

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 10, 2024
  • #58
Ring Of Steel said:
I agree- yet we had endless posts on here detailing how we had no chance of even getting to 50 points, how we were already in a relegation dogfight, and how Robins’ time was up as we were heading straight to League One.
Click to expand...
Well, as the last week has shown the forum seems to be full of people prone to hysteria.

We weren’t and aren’t getting relegated - yesterday was a perfect example of the individual quality we do have even when we’re not performing that well as a unit.

Obviously I called for Robins out and I stand by it, although I do think the Luton and Boro results should have bought him a bit more time.
 
Reactions: Ring Of Steel and Jamesimus

Jamesimus

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 10, 2024
  • #59
skybluecam said:
Well, as the last week has shown the forum seems to be full of people prone to hysteria.

We weren’t and aren’t getting relegated - yesterday was a perfect example of the individual quality we do have even when we’re not performing that well as a unit.

Obviously I called for Robins out and I stand by it, although I do think the Luton and Boro results should have bought him a bit more time.
Click to expand...

That’s very honest. Time will tell if it is the right or wrong call. Heart says wrong and I was against it, but I’ll back any new manager (apart from Joey Barton or Troy Deeney).
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 10, 2024
  • #60
Ring Of Steel said:
I agree- yet we had endless posts on here detailing how we had no chance of even getting to 50 points, how we were already in a relegation dogfight, and how Robins’ time was up as we were heading straight to League One.
Click to expand...
That’s not quite what the posts said is it, but crack on.
 

Ring Of Steel

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 10, 2024
  • #61
skybluecam said:
Well, as the last week has shown the forum seems to be full of people prone to hysteria.

We weren’t and aren’t getting relegated - yesterday was a perfect example of the individual quality we do have even when we’re not performing that well as a unit.

Obviously I called for Robins out and I stand by it, although I do think the Luton and Boro results should have bought him a bit more time.
Click to expand...

I can respect that view 100%.
 
Reactions: skybluecam and Jamesimus

tisza

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 10, 2024
  • #62
Skyblueweeman said:
Not trying to dig you out, but isn't your first sentence a pretty obvious statement and something we'd expect?

I'm pretty 'meh' with all this xG stuff to be honest.

And before I get responses saying I'm thick or don't understand, I'm well into Strokes Gained in the world of golf. Those are around actuals though - how a golfer compares to the rest, measured on a number of aspects of the game.

As far as I can see, xG is all about what 'should've happen.

Happy for anyone to convince me otherwise....but none of that chess nonsense Philosoraptor.
Click to expand...
More a comment that xG isn't the "be all and end all" of determining probability of success in the division. We've scored 20 goals (that's top 6ish in the division). It's goals conceded that are probably the bigger determining factor for where we are in the League and ultimately what cost MR his job.
 
Reactions: Skyblueweeman

SBAndy

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 10, 2024
  • #63
Think if I started talking about the Standard Deviation of XG some people may spontaneously combust. Apart from Philosorapter.
 
Reactions: Frostie and Skyblueweeman

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 10, 2024
  • #64
Ring Of Steel said:
I agree- yet we had endless posts on here detailing how we had no chance of even getting to 50 points, how we were already in a relegation dogfight, and how Robins’ time was up as we were heading straight to League One.
Click to expand...

Can you show any posts that say we wouldn’t get to 50 points?
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 10, 2024
  • #65
Grendel said:
Can you show any posts that say we wouldn’t get to 50 points?
Click to expand...

A couple of People were talking about relegation or being in a relationship fight
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 10, 2024
  • #66
Evo1883 said:
A couple of People were talking about relegation or being in a relationship fight
Click to expand...

Which isn’t again what you have actually said.
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 10, 2024
  • #67
Grendel said:
Which isn’t again what you have actually said.
Click to expand...
I never said anything
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 10, 2024
  • #68
Grendel said:
Can you show any posts that say we wouldn’t get to 50 points?
Click to expand...
I assume he is referring to a thread of mine where even there I don't say it's a certainty we won't get to 50
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 10, 2024
  • #69
Perryccfc said:
Our actual goals compared to our XG isn’t really the issue. Our problem is our XGA and GA tab. Thats a key indicator to what we all know, we’re way to leaky in defence. If our actual GA was in line with our XGA we would be sitting pretty.
Click to expand...
Most of our goals this season have been gifts. The two goals we conceded against Derby was just amateurish.

All the hallmarks of an inexperienced and naive team.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 10, 2024
  • #70
SBAndy said:
Think if I started talking about the Standard Deviation of XG some people may spontaneously combust. Apart from Philosorapter.
Click to expand...
I think he might, but in a very different way.
 
Reactions: SBAndy and Brighton Sky Blue
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?