The only way out of this will be a deal of 'some kind' with SISU (Otium) and nothing will change until that is done.
If what you say Haskell took on the stadium in a deal with the council then needed the franchise of CCFC then he would be faced with having to find 70m to see SISU go. Now on top of the stadium deal would he be willing to part with that kind of money?
A deal initially must be found to bring the current owners back to the City and the Ricoh. make the deal suitable to SISU's end goal and exit strategy. Talk now about how that can be done. That is the only way we can see our club back at the Ricoh and SISU out. One step at a time.
dont see why anyone would offer sisu 70m to go ...... infact i doubt sisu would expect anything like that amount
If a 3rd party bought in to the Ricoh and was confident that it would be successful (why buy in otherwise) then the effect is to distress SISU's investment in CCFC (assuming their plan was to buy the Ricoh freehold)
getting CCFC back at the Ricoh with SISU first is not the only way to get this done ..... but it is the least risky way for CCFC
You can say the same thing about SISUWill Haskell be any better than SISU?
Before we all hail Haskell as the new messiah, have a good hard think about what his motives are for buying into us.
Yet another Johnny Foreigner wanting a piece of a British soccer team. I reckon he only wants the stadium and will use CCFC as a bargaining tool to get it and we'll be further up shit creek than we were before.
I think an offer of somewhere between 20 or 30m would be bitten by SISU and they would go.
The only way out of this will be a deal of 'some kind' with SISU (Otium) and nothing will change until that is done.
If what you say Haskell took on the stadium in a deal with the council then needed the franchise of CCFC then he would be faced with having to find 70m to see SISU go. Now on top of the stadium deal would he be willing to part with that kind of money?
A deal initially must be found to bring the current owners back to the City and the Ricoh. make the deal suitable to SISU's end goal and exit strategy. Talk now about how that can be done. That is the only way we can see our club back at the Ricoh and SISU out. One step at a time.
£20 or £30m? Bates sold Leeds for £17m and they weren't groundless, fanless or bottom of League 1.
I saw somewhere last week that one of the Sisu directors mentioned £30 million to disappear
If the prospect of the RICOH is pulled away from SISU then it's game over - the club is effectively worthless
Does anyone think that if the Higgs sold their share to someone who actually has some money (PH4 is the example banded around but doean't have to be him) and CCC went into negotiations over their share of ACL with the same person, that Fisher/Joy would:
i) actually then build the White Elephant just to spite CCC, or
ii) Launch legal proceedings against everyone, or
iii) sell up?
£20 or £30m? Bates sold Leeds for £17m and they weren't groundless, fanless or bottom of League 1.
Yep, and Preston didn't have enough money for that.
Though think the ground is owned seperately by some dodgy Cayman Islands company.
I should imagine that he (and many others) thought that £17m was far too much for Leeds. So what does that make CCFC worth?
The ground is owned by a company registered in the British Virgin Islands - the Cayman Islands is where the owners of the Ricoh will be registered if SISU ever get their hands on it.
That's okay then, nothing dodgy about the British Virgin Islands, was worried for a bit then!
I can only see an offer with staged payments upon promotion working. I can't see that 70 million is the true debt. They would have to write some of this off. 10 million up front is generous!
Just playing devils advocate....but Haskell may just buy the Ricoh & then sell it on to Sisu/Otium as he knows they are desperate for it......
....If I was a foreign businessman with absolutely no emotional attachment to the "soccer team" & city.....that's what I'd do.
...easy money for a middle man.
...just saying.
I can't see any problems in my opinion with the council holding on to their share until they are convinced that the buyer of the Higgs share is a fit and proper person/company to receive their share.unlikely because right now i dont think the councils shares are for sale to any one. So any potential purchaser is only going to be able to get 50% of ACL plus maybe the development rights to the whole site. I would suspect that the Council would still have right of veto as would be the case in any private limited company where there are two share holders
is there the same potential for CCFC when it is sitting 34 miles away though with no way back unless the new owners of the Ricoh say so ? Think most of us are not taken in by the talk of building a new stadium to solve our finances. Not sure there will be a long line of bidders either for CCFC or the Ricoh. So what is the worth of the potential? and what is that worth without major investment to rebuild it
Any decent price assumes that CCFC have an in on the stadium in the first place - it might not be the case in which case the need for a good price is the sellers not the purchaser of CCFC. Would I pay £10m for CCFC if I were sitting already newly owning the stadium solely or jointly ? No i would let SISU bleed funds until they were desperate. Then pick it up for a nominal amount. To have bought in to the Ricoh I would need to be comfortable that the stadium had a good business without the football team and that there were development opportunities. The football club is likely to have a drain on that and therefore is not as valuable to me as a straight business proposition (forget being a fan and those emotions look at it coldly). I think i would have to view the potential of CCFC as the icing on the cake not the reason to do it.
Got to ask yourself if SISU cant get the stadium and someone else does what are the alternatives and what do they do to the value of CCFC ? None of them increase the value in my opinion. What would you be buying - a debt laden asset poor company that has a threadbare football team at the bottom of L1 that could go L2 if they dont get some good fortune, that has no home in 3 to 5 years and will owe £1m because of it. SISU might want more but I dont see anyone biting with any large sums - £5m max if that
Think that is similar to how it was structured when Sisu took over.
Didn't exactly work for Robinson that one, but I'll control my sorrow.
its a theory or two certainly.
Not saying any of it would happen but if the Ricoh was effectively blocked off from SISU why would you need to pay them much(anything) for the club?
SISU would be saddled with a club that was leaking money, no option but to seek another ground to rent or build, debt increasing, income reduced, a greatly reduced fan base, links to Coventry all but broken, losses every year, no real prospects of paying down the debts. Very little if any value in it.
Personally I wouldnt pay much for it, I certainly wouldnt help dig them out of a hole, and there wont be a long line of bidders for the club. Prospects are get out at any price you can get, continue investing knowing there will be no return or to liquidate
I do wonder what clauses were written in to the agreement with Robinson and how many still remain?
As a guesstimate, considering Coventry city has virtually no assets (other than a mortgaged Ryton training ground), the only value in the club is previous seasons kit (zero retail value) and the remainder of the contracts of the current playing squad!
I would suggest a figure of £5-£10 million would be generous in its current incarnation, Had it got the keys to the ricoh arena it is a whole different ball game. The only thing of any potential value is the arena. Which is the only reason sisu are so keen to hang on to Coventry city, to claim preferential bidding status for the arena. However saying that, the mere fact they are so ruthless that they are prepared to cut off their nose to spite their face, the council should not budge an inch - end game is close
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?